dist1646
Ultimate Member
Thank you for the update, Del. Grammer!
The Democrats are moving HB96...
- Thread starter Delegate Robin Grammer
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Rapture
Total Loser
Thank you for the info.
What the others have said Delegate... Thanks for the direct communication...Keep us informed of other issues as needed.
Danski
Member
Thank you for the update Delegate Grammer.
Helluva first post.
Kicken Wing
Snakes and Sparklers
Thank you Delegate Grammer. I am glad to see you here on MD Shooters! Your efforts are very much appreciated!
Slackdaddy
My pronouns: Iva/Bigun
- Jan 1, 2019
- 5,962
So, if you will have to be 18 (or is it 21 now) to buy a long gun,,
And it will be illegal to loan someone under 21 a gun,,
I guess the DNR will get rid of Hunting licenses for people under 18 or 21 ??
And it will be illegal to loan someone under 21 a gun,,
I guess the DNR will get rid of Hunting licenses for people under 18 or 21 ??
PowPow
Where's the beef?
I'm still holding my comments.
The amendment wipes out the bill, as originally presented, and adds (the all caps/ bold words) LOAN and BORROWER to the list of conditions in 5-134(b).
That section only applies to the transfer of regulated firearms, in the cases defined - when the transferor knows, or had reason to believe, that the transferee is a prohibited possessor.
We, the firearms community, tend to say that we want to chase those breaking laws. This section specifically deals with transfers to prohibited people, not routine transfers between law-abiding persons.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
That section only applies to the transfer of regulated firearms, in the cases defined - when the transferor knows, or had reason to believe, that the transferee is a prohibited possessor.
We, the firearms community, tend to say that we want to chase those breaking laws. This section specifically deals with transfers to prohibited people, not routine transfers between law-abiding persons.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
Blacksmith101
Grumpy Old Man
- Jun 22, 2012
- 22,295
The way I read it it also says you can not take a kid to the range and under your supervision let them shoot your .22 single action revolver or your Thomson Contender rifle because the receiver is regulated.
Last edited:
S&WDDS
Member
Taken one step further (which is why these bills are so insidious), while this only applies to "regulated" firearms, they will never stop trying to regulate all long guns, then viola, without a family member exemption, we'll never be able to take our kids to the range. Effectively eliminating the next generation's exposure to safe firearm use.
As I stated in my testimony in both the house and senate. If the purpose of the bill is to go after someone who “loans” a firearm to a prohibited person. Why don’t they just write that bill up and call it a day?
When they write bills like this, that throw a net on citizens who have never and have no intention of breaking the legal laws, it’s just bad politics. And IMHO is intentional. Every. Single. Time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thank you Delegate Grammer.
Direct info directly from the source is greatly appreciated.
Direct info directly from the source is greatly appreciated.
esqappellate
President, MSI
- Feb 12, 2012
- 7,408
Delegate Grammer. Many thanks for this. This is a vast improvement over the original bill. Generally, we have no problem with amending existing law, Public Safety Section 5-134 to include "loans," but the prohibition on loans to a person under the age of 21 could be read to illegalize firearms instruction otherwise expressly permitted by MD Code Public Safety Section 5-133(d). Attached. Just to be safe, we would like to see an express carve out for such instruction permitted by Section 5-133(d). I can't imagine that the sponsor would have an issue with this.
Thanks. Mark Pennak, President, MSI. mpennak@marylandshallissue.org
Can anyone open the attachment? I have tried and can’t get it to open.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
