It's Stun Guns, but Supreme Court Rules...

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Baccusboy

    Teecha, teecha
    Oct 10, 2010
    13,988
    Seoul
    Hope this isn't a dupe. Didn't see another post on it.

    http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/supreme-court-gives-boost-stun-gun-owners-n542566

    The U.S Supreme Court Monday wiped out a Massachusetts court ruling that had upheld the conviction of a Massachusetts woman who carried a stun gun for protection from an abusive former boyfriend.

    The ruling cast doubt over a handful of state bans on possessing Tasers and other kinds of stun guns.

    Jaime Caetano argued that the state's ban on allowing individuals to possess stun guns violated her Second Amendment right to carry a weapon for self defense.

    She was arrested in Ashland, Massachusetts in 2011 after police officers, investigating a supermarket's complaint about possible shoplifting, found the weapon in her purse. She told them she needed it to fend off a former boyfriend who was abusive. A Massachusetts law bans possession of the weapons by all but police officers......
     

    trickg

    Guns 'n Drums
    MDS Supporter
    Jul 22, 2008
    14,719
    Glen Burnie
    Not a dupe, but it's being chatted about in the Kolbe thread.

    IMO any 8-0 decision that quotes and uses Heller as precedent is a good thing.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,538
    Messages
    7,285,508
    Members
    33,475
    Latest member
    LikeThatHendrix

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom