Does 1CA allow live video like 9CA Does? I would love to be a fly on the wall while this was going on....
Gould v. O'Leary 1st Circuit(Mass. CCW challenge)
- Thread starter press1280
- Start date
-
- Tags
- boston massachusetts
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Knuckle Dragger
Active Member
- May 7, 2012
- 213
No, but audio should be available tomorrow or Friday.
Knuckle Dragger
Active Member
- May 7, 2012
- 213
Not much to report from today's hearing. We had 10 minutes, they had ten minutes. Boston, Brookline, and the Commonwealth split their time 3-3-4. For the most part the judges didn't allow any extra time.
We should have audio tomorrow.
We should have audio tomorrow.
mxrider
Former MSI Treasurer
Gut feeling?
They didn't waste any time!
Comm2A
Member
Oh yeah! Glad to have you among us!
Not sure which judge asked the first question but he has definitely drunk from the G&S punch bowl.
What a crock of shit from the commonwealth. We've been restricting the right for a long time so it should be presumed lawful. I'd love to tell the IRS that since I have been cheating on my taxes for a long time it should be presumed lawful. And since the legislature has been passing these laws for such a long time the will of the people to trash the 2A should be okey dokey?
Not as bad as the JV lawyer who argued the Young case but not far behind.
Not as bad as the JV lawyer who argued the Young case but not far behind.
MA is really curious to me in that basically the entire state is shall issue except Boston and some similarly located jurisdictions. Even non-res permits handled by the Mass Staties are generally unrestricted carry. Not that it is anything we didn't know, but it just shows how disingenuous these commies are with their "public safety" argument. Can they even believe this themselves?
Not sure which judge asked the first question but he has definitely drunk from the G&S punch bowl.
+1
Knuckle Dragger
Active Member
- May 7, 2012
- 213
You say that like you think it will make a difference.
Well of course if the judges are dead set against us then that's all there is to it. I wasn't 100% convinced they would rule against us.
Maybe 90%.
Remember that there's a split on the table no matter how this panel rules. They have to have it in the back of their minds that their opinion could end up before a SCOTUS with Brett Kavanaugh. They'll need to dot their I's and cross their T's.
Loss at CA1 https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca1/17-2202/17-2202-2018-11-02.html
Pretty much expected. The court is using the newly found line of defense that the Southern antebellum cases(the only cases from that time period which are on point BTW) which Young and Wrenn rely upon can simply be disregarded.
So another case is ready for SCOTUS, pending en banc, which will be denied.
Pretty much expected. The court is using the newly found line of defense that the Southern antebellum cases(the only cases from that time period which are on point BTW) which Young and Wrenn rely upon can simply be disregarded.
So another case is ready for SCOTUS, pending en banc, which will be denied.
Once again, a court used Rational Basis while pretending it used Intermediate Scrutiny. What music goes with the 2A Two-Step?
jcutonilli
Ultimate Member
- Mar 28, 2013
- 2,474
Why is it rational basis and not intermediate scrutiny? I keep hearing people say this but they provide no real explanation as to why this is the case. If you want the courts to accept this you need to provide a reasonable explanation. Nobody has and SCOTUS has not stepped in to change it.
They, the court, mentions stun guns in the definition of firearms. I thought that was cleared up? Or is it still in the law and just won't be prosecuted?
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
-
Hair-trigger posting... please include more than just the "headline" (7 Viewers)- Started by Mr H
- Replies: 11
-
-
-
(Duplicate - mods please close) MoCo trans student arrested for threatening school (1 Viewer)- Started by Lafayette
- Replies: 2