Well, then, I'll just keep BOOB-ing along, then, for now! To keep it interesting, I've already worked through half a dozen General tests and passed anywhere from barely to solidly, so I know what's next.
While rolling in slow motion around the outer loop at lunchtime today, I tuned into the MARC repeater. It’s sort of like listening to a very polite version of The Water Cooler. Topics included sandwiches, TSA shoe protocol for amputees, lego car models, and of course that pesky feed line at the repeater that keeps introducing hiss.
I had no trouble resisting that PTT button at this time
Don't see it discussed here yet: HF Signals just releases a new version (V6) of the uBITX transceiver. It's an open-design all-band HF unit and I think it's a good QRP/starter rig, all for $150 ($200 with case). Screen is way to slow, but hopefully that will improve once KD8CEC gets his hands on it and rewrites the code!
https://www.hfsignals.com/
Also the link to the band plan in the FAQ is 404. New version is here:
www.arrl.org/files/file/Regulatory/Band Chart/Band Chart - 11X17 Color.pdf
Also the link to the band plan in the FAQ is 404. New version is here:
www.arrl.org/files/file/Regulatory/Band Chart/Band Chart - 11X17 Color.pdf
That depends entirely on what that something is, whether or not it works, and if it meets the needs of the buyer. I think the uBITX compares favorably for me, considering its form, function, and open design. You're mileage may vary.How does that compare to finding something used at a Hamfest?
Made my first contact with Hawaii tonight. I also discovered a website called PSK reporter where you can see what other ham stations have picked up your digital signals. I was surprised to see stations in New Zealand and Antartica both picked up my signal on 40m at about -15db. That just seems too cool with a little 100 watt radio and a cheap wire dipole running along the ridge of my attic.
I still have not been able to have one HF voice contact. I could hear people talking from Alabama, Texas, Indiana and upstate NY, but I don’t think anyone could hear me.
You can get on websdr.org and pick a distant US station and listen for yourself (and see your signal in the waterfall) on it while xmitting voice
What a cool thing. As an IT guy, I’m somewhat embarrassed at how unaware I’ve been of how the HAM world has leveraged the internet for things like this.
I assume you're not using 100W on digital.
You can get on websdr.org and pick a distant US station and listen for yourself (and see your signal in the waterfall) on it while xmitting voice (and any other mode of course just might help diag your voice issue if you have one).
I was at the time. It seems like it needs to be that high to reach europe or South America. I’ve tried lower power and I can sometimes reach Alabama and Maine on 25w but strangely not Ohio. I think is due to the orientation of my antenna. Is there some additional risk or damage to the rig while using 100W digitally?
Most transceivers aren't built to operate at full power when doing digital modes because the duty cycle much higher than voice. Most recommend not going above 50% when doing digital modes.
Got it. I have only tried FT4 and FT8 so far, and those are 50% duty cycle max. Your previous response did give me an idea. I could transmit at low power, say 10W, and use PSK reporter to see where my signal is being received. Then work up from there.
Got it. I have only tried FT4 and FT8 so far, and those are 50% duty cycle max. Your previous response did give me an idea. I could transmit at low power, say 10W, and use PSK reporter to see where my signal is being received. Then work up from there.