Fustercluck
Active Member
.45 is pretty easy to load for, as it is very forgiving (the window of "good shooting" is large and tough to mess up). Take a look at a burn rate chart...powders are listed in descending order of burn rate. For years Alliant Bullseye was the burn rate standard (a 1.0 listing, with everything afterwards being slower). Modern burn rate charts have faster powders (more energetic), but most still recognize Bullseye as the standard. That being said, I shoot 3.8 of Bullseye behind a 185 grain semi-wadcutter bullet...it's a target load, extremely light recoil, but VERY accurate. For those who say that case volume has an effect, I vehemently disagree. Look at the national champions in pistol...they all use somewhere in the range of 3.5-4.5 of Bullseye or a similar powder. Years ago there was an urban legend that revolver shooters were blowing up their guns by using a light charge of a fast powder in a large case (say Bullseye in a .357), causing the powder to detonate rather than deflagrate. In almost every case that was investigated it was found that the cases were double-charged...so the real danger with a low-volume, high energy powder is that it's not immediately obvious that you've overcharged a case. If you double-charge a case with something like Trailboss (cowboy action powder), the case will overflow and you'll know you screwed up. If you double up a 3.8 charge of Bullseye and don't catch it, the first indication will be the bananna leafed barrel, hoping the slide holds it together (an exaggeration, as 7.6 of Bullseye won't blow up your gun...it'l bulge your barrel, but not blow the gun up). So short story long, I chose that combo for accuracy, and it delivers...you're pushing bullets out like a mortar (you can see them go downrange if the lighting is right), but they hold X-ring groups at 50 yards from a ransom rest.
This may sound counterintuitive, but I agree with everything you said, especially about accuracy from small charges. My previous post postulating that an ideal load would occupy more than 1/3 of case capacity and provide the most consistent accuracy is true. It also has the potential to affect group consistency.
The most accurate bullseye load out of my old Bullseye gun was 4g of Bullseye pushing a 200g Star LSWC with a crimp of 0.468". If I held the gun at a slight upward angle, it would chrono 75fps faster than a flat shooting trajectory, with a commensurate decrease in group consistency.
The reason why my groups stay tight when shooting is because I keep the gun at the same level (with the powder leveling out the same way in the case) with each shot. The same theory applies to a ransom rest; the same loading produces ES's less than 15 fps.
fa18, as a complete aside, are you one of the guys I shoot IDPA with at AAFG? There is a guy there that I think flies Hornets (or used to). Always meant to ask you.
Regards,
Danny