Ammo, range time, training, fees (like the W&C process) seem a lot easier in that regard. It's just the shootin' iron that screams caution, for me.
My old CPA told me to write all this stuff off as training lol
My old CPA told me to write all this stuff off as training lol
My tax guy tells me every year that since I have a security clearance and occasionally work from home my firearms and ammo purchases are tax deductible, as would be any expenses for a security system.
If carrying/ using a firearm is part of your job, range time, ammo, training, etc ( and holsters, related gear, ballistic vests, etc)is definitely deductable .
Actual firearm can be trickier . You would need to convincingly show that the particular firearm is used strictly for job purposes, and not used for, or suitable for personal use on your own time .
Added - After looking at thread title more closely , need to add , the above is in regards to personal income taxes .
If the thread is actually about the business entity's books, and not you as an individual , the training , and practice to maintain proficiency costs should be business expenses ( providing said training is plausably related to job duties ).
Actual firearms would be trickier, as then matters over ownership of said firearms . Consult your tax lawyer .
I expensed a ccw holster. My CPA questioned it and I said the state only allows me carry while doing my Sole Proprietor company so to me its arguable for work only.
The expense must be "ordinary and necessary". Just because MSP says you can have a firearm for self defense only while conducting business does not mean that having a firearm for self defense is "ordinary and necessary" for your business.
I would challenge my client to show me how having a firearm is considered "ordinary" for the trade and then how it is considered "necessary" for the business. For instance, I am an attorney. Is it ordinary for attorneys to CCW? Is carrying concealed an ordinary thing for attorneys? Now, it might very well be necessary for me, but it still is not ordinary for the profession. If the client insisted on taking the deduction and I thought it was a grey area, I would send the client an e-mail stating that I think it is a grey area, that I would put it on the return, but that I would not be responsible for any interest/penalty if the deduction ended up being disallowed.
I wonder if an insurance analysis would work. You don't really need it, but its ordinary and necessary. And I should add that in places like VA, it's ordinary to carry.
If you don't need it, how can it be necessary?
The expense must be "ordinary and necessary". Just because MSP says you can have a firearm for self defense only while conducting business does not mean that having a firearm for self defense is "ordinary and necessary" for your business.
I would challenge my client to show me how having a firearm is considered "ordinary" for the trade and then how it is considered "necessary" for the business. For instance, I am an attorney. Is it ordinary for attorneys to CCW? Is carrying concealed an ordinary thing for attorneys? Now, it might very well be necessary for me, but it still is not ordinary for the profession. If the client insisted on taking the deduction and I thought it was a grey area, I would send the client an e-mail stating that I think it is a grey area, that I would put it on the return, but that I would not be responsible for any interest/penalty if the deduction ended up being disallowed.
I would argue that a prosecutor would consider it necessary.
Don't play the lawyer game with me. Maybe I should have stated, it's not legally required, but I maintain it to protect my interest. Is that better.