Go Back   Maryland Shooters > The Arsenal > Rifles

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old September 12th, 2017, 04:18 PM #11
NateIU10's Avatar
NateIU10 NateIU10 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southport, CT
Posts: 4,364
Images: 9
NateIU10 NateIU10 is offline
Senior Member
NateIU10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southport, CT
Posts: 4,364
Images: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Recon_D0c View Post
its 100% OK to shoulder a pistol brace. Literally zero doubt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Recon_D0c View Post
its 100% OK to shoulder a pistol brace. Literally zero doubt.
I disagree, but I have a hard time with saying "100%" about pretty much anything. Such is a life of living in the grey, I suppose.

There is currently one Open Letter from the ATF addressing arm braces. This Open Letter states that "Any individual letters stating otherwise are contrary to the plain language of the NFA, misapply Federal law, and are hereby revoked." Further clarification of ATF's position through an individual letter was not the proper way to "revoke" or clarify an Open Letter.
__________________
Disclaimer

My posts are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. These posts do not constitute, nor do they create, an attorney-client relationship. The information provided in this post is general only, and you should not act upon this information without consulting with a licensed attorney.

The opinions expressed are those of the individual author and not the opinions of any firm or organization.
NateIU10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 12th, 2017, 04:30 PM #12
swinokur's Avatar
swinokur swinokur is offline
In a State of Denial
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Stalag Montgomery
Posts: 38,119
swinokur swinokur is offline
In a State of Denial
swinokur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Stalag Montgomery
Posts: 38,119
hey there Nate. how r u?
__________________
swinokur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 12th, 2017, 04:34 PM #13
NateIU10's Avatar
NateIU10 NateIU10 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southport, CT
Posts: 4,364
Images: 9
NateIU10 NateIU10 is offline
Senior Member
NateIU10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southport, CT
Posts: 4,364
Images: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by swinokur View Post
hey there Nate. how r u?
I'm doing great, how are you doing Stu?!

CT is just as messed up as MD when it comes to guns, but all is good outside of that...
__________________
Disclaimer

My posts are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. These posts do not constitute, nor do they create, an attorney-client relationship. The information provided in this post is general only, and you should not act upon this information without consulting with a licensed attorney.

The opinions expressed are those of the individual author and not the opinions of any firm or organization.
NateIU10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 12th, 2017, 04:35 PM #14
swinokur's Avatar
swinokur swinokur is offline
In a State of Denial
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Stalag Montgomery
Posts: 38,119
swinokur swinokur is offline
In a State of Denial
swinokur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Stalag Montgomery
Posts: 38,119
great. yeah I got a CT CCW just in case. At least they will issue a permit.

glad all is well.
__________________
swinokur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 12th, 2017, 04:52 PM #15
Biggfoot44 Biggfoot44 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 13,668
Biggfoot44 Biggfoot44 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 13,668
For the benefit of our newer OP :

While I am sure NateIU10 isn't offering * Legal Advice * upon the internet , he IS a Lawyer, who specializes in Firearms Issues .
Biggfoot44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 12th, 2017, 10:50 PM #16
md_al md_al is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Middle River
Posts: 452
md_al md_al is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Middle River
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ideal Paradigm View Post
I am not a lawyer, but as far as I understand, that's not necessarily true in terms of what the ATF has released. It's completely contingent on your intent when constructing your AR pistol. Braces are not designed for shouldering, and shouldering a brace does not necessarily mean the weapon was redesigned into a rifle, as a stock is what dictates if something is considered a rifle or SBR. I would not make the general statement that braces can be shouldered, because they cannot be (depending at which ATF letter you're reading).
Intent of having the brace is for cheek weld. The pistol having a Franklin Binary trigger. It may inadvertently come in contact with the shoulder in the course of recoil/ sighting the target. I have been firing a 22 conversion bolt on a 10.5" upper.
Now should I want to swap the upper to a 16" barrel and fire .223 rounds (without changing the brace for a standard stock), since it is still a pistol, should the upper be HBAR?
__________________
HQL April 2014
MD Designated Collector
NRA Life
Stamp collector
Part-time paper puncher
md_al is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 13th, 2017, 03:31 AM #17
Ideal Paradigm Ideal Paradigm is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 24
Ideal Paradigm Ideal Paradigm is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by md_al View Post
Intent of having the brace is for cheek weld. The pistol having a Franklin Binary trigger. It may inadvertently come in contact with the shoulder in the course of recoil/ sighting the target. I have been firing a 22 conversion bolt on a 10.5" upper.
Now should I want to swap the upper to a 16" barrel and fire .223 rounds (without changing the brace for a standard stock), since it is still a pistol, should the upper be HBAR?
I am not a lawyer. The copy of the SB 281 bill that I have states that if a firearm has a barrel under 16 inches, it is considered a handgun. I didn't see anything explicitly saying that a rifle is 16 inches or more, but I may have missed it. That being said, if a handgun is a 16 inch barrel and shorter, then it would be implied that 16 inches or greater is a rifle if the barrel has rifling (i.e. not a shotgun because it isn't smooth bore). This is my interpretation of SB 281.

Additionally, if you have a 16 inch barrel, then that could potentially mean that you would also have to satisfy the minimum 29 inch overall length for the firearm.

So if you had a 16 inch barrel, yes, from what I understand, it would have to be HBAR (applies to .223/5.56, not sure about .308). Please remember that federal law and state laws both combine, and whichever is more strict are the ones that you should follow. One instance that I can think of where that doesn't apply is that if state law contradicts federal law, in which case hopefully someone brings that to a court's attention and has it overturned. In that case you would have to follow the contradictory law in the meantime simply to avoid the trouble of legal fees, getting arrested, etc. while the law is overturned.

I'm not a lawyer, but my personal recommendation is to always stay out of the gray area if you can. That being said, if you want a longer barrel and want to keep the pistol configuration, go with a arm brace/stabilizing blade of some type, along with a barrel that is less than 16 inches (14.5 inches could fit the bill for you, don't pin and weld the muzzle attachment). Overall length won't apply because it's not a rifle (considered a handgun since the barrel is less than 16 inches by Maryland law, and it also doesn't have a stock so it doesn't meet the definition of a rifle for the ATF).

The only other thing that I would advise is that to make sure that when you purchased your lower, that it was purchased as a pistol or receiver, and not a rifle. For a rifle can never be made into a pistol according to the ATF, but a pistol can be converted a rifle and then converted back into a pistol.

Regarding the second part of your original post for the ATF classification, it is a little more complex. If you have an AR pistol that has a barrel under 16 inches, but the overall length is greater than 26 inches, then it is classified simply as "firearm", not AOW. In this case, yes, you can have a vertical foregrip because it doesn't change the fact that the weapon was designed to be fired with one hand (pistol definition). If you have an overall length of less than 26 inches and a barrel length of less than 16 inches, then you cannot put a vertical foregrip on it. You can put an angled foregrip on it. As far as I know, an angled foregrip does not count as an additional pistol grip from the last that I saw from the ATF. Keep in mind this is simply at the federal level, and there may be state laws that apply further. If these are things that you are interested in doing, I would do as much as you can to find out as much as possible about the legalities of these configurations. Preferably, talking to a lawyer that is familiar with both the federal laws and state laws of where you live.

If I may ask, what is your desire for a 16 inch barrel?
Ideal Paradigm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 13th, 2017, 07:06 AM #18
Biggfoot44 Biggfoot44 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 13,668
Biggfoot44 Biggfoot44 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 13,668
He wants to hear 16in plus pistol brace as a workaround to a quasi rifle w/o HBAR .

What is rifle, what is pistol, what is Both, what is neither, what is NFA in combination with any of the above is an Alice in wonderland situation .

Key points :

Per Md , bbl < 16in = pistol regardless of anything else.

Per Md AND Fed , Rifle must be " designed to be fired from shoulder " . True pistols may have bbl over. 16In . Best known popular example is the T/C Contender Super 16 , with actual bbl length of 16.25in .

Without commenting on the wisdom , I can sympathize with the motivation to take optimistic interpretations of "Arm Brace " letter de jour to avoid NFA and delays thereof with shorties. For just sidestepping a bbl profile, I'm not seeing the potential juice .
Biggfoot44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 13th, 2017, 08:42 AM #19
ADCOLE's Avatar
ADCOLE ADCOLE is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Upper Marlboro
Posts: 18
ADCOLE ADCOLE is offline
Junior Member
ADCOLE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Upper Marlboro
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggfoot44 View Post
Pretty much.

Depends on your priorities between wishing for :

1. Shortest possible ( somthing) with front vertical grip

2. Trunk/ Truck gun
If he were to add a vertical grip then it would be considered a SBR and not a pistol.

Last edited by ADCOLE; September 13th, 2017 at 10:39 PM. Reason: spelling
ADCOLE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 13th, 2017, 10:46 AM #20
Biggfoot44 Biggfoot44 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 13,668
Biggfoot44 Biggfoot44 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 13,668
Not sure what is " SBAR " ?

Vert fore grip AND < 26in OAL = Fedral AOW , banned in Maryland.

Vert fore grip AND bbl < 16in, but OAL > 26in = Other ( non- NFA) for Federal, , but Pistol in Md .

Vert Foregrip AND bbl> 16in AND OAL > 26in = Other for both Federal and Md . Transport by long gun regs for Md .
Biggfoot44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Home Page > Forum List > The Arsenal > Rifles


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
2017, Congregate Media, LP Privacy Policy Terms of Service