A plus would be because mag limits would be prohibited if you have a license to carry
Rep. Hudson to introduce Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act
- Thread starter swinokur
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
I am not fond of Ammo and magazines being redefined as handguns. There is that law of unintentional consequences.
If they can shore up those 2 definitions, then the bill would be really good. As it stands now, it needs a tweak.
If they can shore up those 2 definitions, then the bill would be really good. As it stands now, it needs a tweak.
much better than the Senate version.
- Aug 29, 2016
- 763
It's only redefined for purposes of this one section. I'm not convinced at all by the author of that article's arguments. The law does not federalize private bans. It only states that federal preemption doesn't apply to state property.
I heard either today or yesterday, that 4 states have filed a suite against the federal government for the military not providing prohibiting information from being to the FBI for denying purchases using the NICS system. I wonder if that will either help or hurt this effort. Wasn't this already being addressed,
How many LEOs from other states will even know to look on the back of a MD permit to inspect for restrictions?
I think it may help. They've gone far out on record saying they want better reporting for background checks and the Fix NICS (attached to the House reciprocity) bill in theory does just that.
But we all know the SF congressional delegation won't vote for it no matter what.
More Pelosi lies. This POS has no shame.
https://hotair.com/archives/2017/12/12/three-pinocchios-pelosi-concealed-carry-reciprocity-act/
.
.
https://hotair.com/archives/2017/12/12/three-pinocchios-pelosi-concealed-carry-reciprocity-act/
.
.
Attachments
Richard Hudson to make a pitch next week to the WH to get reciprocity going (or through the Senate to be more accurate).
http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/12/n...e-house-in-push-for-national-concealed-carry/
http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/12/n...e-house-in-push-for-national-concealed-carry/
About time, and not a moment too soon. Dems are foaming over various illegal alien “fixes.” If this can’t be a part of some grand DACA, it will never pass.
They better hurry. DACA is on the front burner. Of course the Dems will howl if it's attached to progressive legislation like DACA.
Good.
Good.
Hudson admits he'd be happy with the Senate version if it makes it through. Doesn't help us but will allow other state residents to carry here.
A giant step forward no matter the still existing disadvantage to us.
j_h_smith
Ultimate Member
- Jul 28, 2007
- 28,516
Just bring the Bill to the floor. Lets see how it goes. All of this politicking about this Bill is getting ridiculous. Just put it out for a vote.
I agree.
This recent article points out how some Senate Democrats are caught between a rock and a hard place regarding national reciprocity.
Concealed carry reciprocity coming soon to the U.S. Senate
http://www.macon.com/opinion/readers-opinion/article193916549.html
j_h_smith
Ultimate Member
- Jul 28, 2007
- 28,516
I know it's difficult for some to believe, but there are a fair amount of Democrats that are gun people. I think they would be very interested in this Bill. It needs to come to the floor now to help our efforts in this years elections.
Most Dems aren't single issue voters, but this could be the tipping point for some. This would also have the possibility to bring the Republican voters back out to the voting booths. I can't see it hurting the Republican party at all.
Schumer is not a gun guy. The Dems will do as they are told
j_h_smith
Ultimate Member
- Jul 28, 2007
- 28,516
I'm not too sure about that. There are a few who have constituents who are more red than blue today. And we only need a few to suit our needs.
- Feb 19, 2013
- 18,759
Not sure what Miguel has been smoking.. They'll work it out among themselves who can vote for the Bill "if" this is an issue, and it will lose by one vote
I'm thinking it unlikely it'll be attached with DACA since that'll already have border security/wall, exc. It may look like too much of a poison pill.
There may be other bargaining chips available (reefer legislation,exc.), although the Fix Nics is itself a bargaining chip, just look at how the Dems are whining about it being attached to the House bill.
I'm afraid you may be right. Those up in 2018 will have priority to go ahead and vote for it based on polling.
One interesting note is that Manchin (WV), who co-sponsored a reciprocity bill last year which was almost identical the this years Senate bill, has sent out a canned, waffling response to a constituents' letter asking for support. State's rights, lack of training were mentioned (even though it wasn't an issue for his bill last year!).
I think the Dems may think that the defy Trump at all turns will work even on gun bills.
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
Sign up on our online store and earn 1000 points- Started by J_Gunslinger
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
-
-