I’m fine putting a useless serial # on them. I would never, in my wildest dreams hide anything from MD.
Ghost Gun Ban
- Thread starter WeaponsCollector
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
I’m fine putting a useless serial # on them. I would never, in my wildest dreams hide anything from MD.
Cali dodges this by issuing you a serial number, at least in theory.
DubTap21
Active Member
Retards
Sent from my SM-N930T using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N930T using Tapatalk
Brickman301
Ultimate Member
What about all those guns made before 1968, that don't have serial numbers? Idiots!
They didn't think of that. There will be a clause in there, I'm sure.
Why would they put a special clause in? Those guns are as untraceable as any gun made recently without a serial number.
I'm amazed at all the outrage over language in a bill that hasn't even been written yet.
Yes, it's Dumais, so she has something malicious up her sleeve for firearms owners, based on her performance last session with her sneaked-in version of the ERPO bill. But we're arguing over details that don't exist yet. Please save the energy for when the MGA is in session; there will be plenty to be angry about once actual bills start appearing.
Yes, it's Dumais, so she has something malicious up her sleeve for firearms owners, based on her performance last session with her sneaked-in version of the ERPO bill. But we're arguing over details that don't exist yet. Please save the energy for when the MGA is in session; there will be plenty to be angry about once actual bills start appearing.
iH8DemLibz
When All Else Fails.
Pre 68 firearms, manufactured by the firearm industry, isn't what they're targeting. They're targeting receivers produced by the great unwashed.
I believe we'll see legislation that will make the buying, selling, or transferring of aluminum paperweights illegal in Maryland.
Then they'll grandfather the receivers already produced in Maryland the same way they grandfathered bump stocks and RFTAs.
I believe we'll see legislation that will make the buying, selling, or transferring of aluminum paperweights illegal in Maryland.
Then they'll grandfather the receivers already produced in Maryland the same way they grandfathered bump stocks and RFTAs.
MrsRab1515
Active Member
So, effectively not at all, right?
The way the MGA pushed through the bump-stock possession ban has me upset about this.
They may ask you to prove you possessed a pre-68 non-serialized firearm prior to some arbitrary date or face confiscation and criminal charges. (Like the bump-stock legislation, get an ATF approval that is not something the ATF does.)
I do not trust the folks in Annapolis to do anything remotely reasonable if this becomes law.
They may ask you to prove you possessed a pre-68 non-serialized firearm prior to some arbitrary date or face confiscation and criminal charges. (Like the bump-stock legislation, get an ATF approval that is not something the ATF does.)
I do not trust the folks in Annapolis to do anything remotely reasonable if this becomes law.
dogbone
Ultimate Member
Well, since you are an MD, it would be kind of pointless trying to hide something from yourself, minus some sort of Jedi mind trick.
dogbone
Ultimate Member
The time to get rolling on this is now. Once the session starts, they already have the bill written and backing for it lined up. They will have had months of media coverage pushing their propaganda to line up voter support.
We just dodged the "red flag" BS here in Texas. We didn't do it by waiting for the bill to be crafted. We turned out opposition to the proposed bill at the preliminary hearings and through pre-session pressure on the legicritters and Governor. The time to get going on a job is as soon as you see the job needs to be done.
They will appease the hunters and collectors. Pre-68 will be 50 years old by the time this law goes into effect. Exempt C&R. Boom. Done.
I think we sort of agree. You need something to swing at, draft language. As we've seen with previous bills, if the D supermajority wants something to pass, something will pass, under the same title. The greatest chance for success is getting bad bills neutered (and occasionally delayed to a subsequent MGA session like the standard capacity mag ban) during the hearing process by pointing out flaws and second and third-order effects from specific language. Right now there is no language to point out obvious idiocy in, just anecdotes that something will be introduced by someone with the power to make almost anything pass if unchallenged.
The only certainty we have is that a senior member of the supermajority party who has shown extraordinary malice towards lawful firearms owners in the past, and a willingness to bypass normal legislative process, say she intends to "do something" about 3D printing and "ghost guns".
iH8DemLibz
When All Else Fails.
That bolt face is hilarious.
I noticed some deburring of the FCG pocket.
Might we see jeweler's files and emery paper added to the list of banned eighty items.
I noticed some deburring of the FCG pocket.
Might we see jeweler's files and emery paper added to the list of banned eighty items.
Mr H
Banana'd
Anyone who wants to complain should be doing so to the GA membership. Our side can do pre-work, too.
