Malpasso v Pallozzi SCOTUS Cert Petition Filed

rockstarr · Nov 22, 2019

2 more weeks

press1280 · Nov 23, 2019

rockstarr said:
2 more weeks

For NYSRPA orals. For this case it'll be months before anything happens other than a few briefs being filed........

RoadDawg · Nov 23, 2019

press1280 said:
For NYSRPA orals. For this case it'll be months before anything happens other than a few briefs being filed........

Hopefully AFTER RGB is replaced with a Constitutionalist. :thumbsup:

Preferably one such as Scalia who believes that the COTUS still means what the writers intended it to mean when they wrote it.

GTOGUNNER · Nov 23, 2019

RGB Probably won't be there the 2nd. She's in JHU Hospital.

RoadDawg · Nov 23, 2019

GTOGUNNER said:
RGB Probably won't be there the 2nd. She's in JHU Hospital.

For her sake I hope things go well... so she can retire...

Occam · Nov 23, 2019

GTOGUNNER said:
RGB Probably won't be there the 2nd. She's in JHU Hospital.

Reports say fevers and chills responded well to IV, to be released in the morning.

Muleskinner · Nov 23, 2019

RoadDawg said:
For her sake I hope things go well... so she can retire...

She has already said she won't retire..death will be her retirement unless a lefty takes POTUS

danb · Dec 19, 2019

Brief of William M. Pallozzi in opposition submitted.

docket: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/19-423.html

brief: http://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketP...Brief in Opposition _Malpasso v. Pallozzi.pdf

wow, I think this says it all right there:

Maryland law does not ban the public carrying of handguns. Instead, it allows a lawful owner of a hand-gun to wear, carry, or transport the handgun without a permit in a public place in connection with a wide range of activities and with a permit where the applicant has a good and substantial reason, including to provide protection from apprehended danger. Histori-cally, Maryland has granted the overwhelming majority of permit applications based on a claimed good and substantial reason.

so, what are these wide range of activities you may ask...

I literally have not made it past page two and I am already furious with the blatant lies. :mad54:

NYRangers917 · Dec 19, 2019

danb said:
Brief of William M. Pallozzi in opposition submitted.

docket: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/19-423.html

brief: http://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketP...Brief in Opposition _Malpasso v. Pallozzi.pdf

wow, I think this says it all right there:

so, what are these wide range of activities you may ask...

I literally have not made it past page two and I am already furious with the blatant lies.

hopefully someone more familiar with legalese will translate for us

danb · Dec 19, 2019

NYRangers917 said:
hopefully someone more familiar with legalese will translate for us

translation: ********.

Its basically a "greatest hits" of all the lies they have been telling themselves, like the MDSP approves 90% of wear and carry applications.

delaware_export · Dec 19, 2019

I realize that a judges job is to judge. Ok. Forget the grain, an apple flavored block of salt goes here.

I’d be interested in scotus, any one of them, have a trusted, legal, JohnQ public, not Leo or otherwise “special” friend take walk doing open carry, and observe the results.

How long would it take for arrest, or worse, shooting by officer. MWAG.

Ditto permits. Have a non govt employee, non business owner, say a hotel/motel housekeeper, or fisherman, or heavy equipment operator, or similar apply for a permit.

Observe the results.

I suspect the results wouldn’t matter. All kinds of the antis are made up against 2a.

danb said:
Brief of William M. Pallozzi in opposition submitted.

docket: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/19-423.html

brief: http://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketP...Brief in Opposition _Malpasso v. Pallozzi.pdf

wow, I think this says it all right there:

so, what are these wide range of activities you may ask...

I literally have not made it past page two and I am already furious with the blatant lies.

Blacksmith101 · Dec 19, 2019

danb said:
translation: ********.

Its basically a "greatest hits" of all the lies they have been telling themselves, like the MDSP approves 90% of wear and carry applications.

Does anyone get a chance to make them swear under oath to these lies so they can be charged with perjury?

Blacksmith101 · Dec 19, 2019

Although petitioners made no record in the district court, publicly available data shows that, historically, Maryland’s Department of State Police has granted more than 90 percent of applications seeking a permit to publicly wear, carry, or transport a handgun for pro-tection against apprehended danger.

Page 1 second paragraph.

So "apprehended danger" must be the only "good and substantial reason" you need. :liar:

Some Guy · Dec 19, 2019

danb said:
Brief of William M. Pallozzi in opposition submitted.

docket: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/19-423.html

brief: http://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketP...Brief in Opposition _Malpasso v. Pallozzi.pdf

wow, I think this says it all right there:

so, what are these wide range of activities you may ask...

I literally have not made it past page two and I am already furious with the blatant lies.

My. Head. Just. Popped.

What a bunch of lies.

NYRangers917 · Dec 19, 2019

so is this case on the docket for the SCOTUS or no?

daNattyFatty · Dec 19, 2019

NYRangers917 said:
so is this case on the docket for the SCOTUS or no?

It was distributed for conference, but has been held because of the state dragging their feet.

They waived their response to the cert petition. SCOTUS requested a response, and there was an extension granted from the original due date.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

DivingDriver · Dec 19, 2019

So I guess I can open carry everywhere as long as my intent is to go target practicing.
:banghead:

Occam · Dec 19, 2019

DivingDriver said:
So I guess I can open carry everywhere as long as my intent is to go target practicing.

Or dog training! Fido! Fetch my copy of the Constitution! Good boy!

teratos · Dec 19, 2019

I can't believe I just read that. Ridiculous.

NYRangers917 · Dec 19, 2019

daNattyFatty said:
It was distributed for conference, but has been held because of the state dragging their feet.

They waived their response to the cert petition. SCOTUS requested a response, and there was an extension granted from the original due date.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

sigh maybe next year..... there should be a rule against the state dragging their feet to prolong this sh*t without good cause

Malpasso v Pallozzi SCOTUS Cert Petition Filed

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Major Deplorable

Ultimate Member

Nos nostraque Deo

IANAL, PATRIOT PICKET!!

Nos nostraque Deo

Not Even ONE Indictment

Ultimate Member

dont be a dumbass

Active Member

dont be a dumbass

Ultimate Member

Grumpy Old Man

Grumpy Old Man

Ultimate Member

Active Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Not Even ONE Indictment

My hair is amazing

Active Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics