Bisleyfan44
Ultimate Member
Bring it on. My suggestion was to make the whole season weapon of choice, but this is a good first step. Deer overpopulation is deer overpopulation, buck or doe. I realize shooting a doe helps control populations than shooting a buck, but I don't think the number of "antlerless' bucks being killed will increase all that much. The number of hunters out at that time of the year combined with the small number of "antlerless" bucks will make the number of these harvested relatively small.
And as usual, the most vocal critics are the bowhunters. They complain every time another segment of the season is opened to muzzleloaders or gun hunters. The actual kills made by bowhunters each year is really quite small; the population will never be kept in check by them, they don't kill enough. You could make deer season bow-only, statewide, all year-round, and the population will still never be kept in check.
Every county should be opened to rifles and handguns where safe to do so. Access to more public lands should be increased. The "safety zone" should be decreased to a more reasonable distance like 50 yards. All good. None will have as dramatic effect as increasing time available to gun hunters, though.
And as usual, the most vocal critics are the bowhunters. They complain every time another segment of the season is opened to muzzleloaders or gun hunters. The actual kills made by bowhunters each year is really quite small; the population will never be kept in check by them, they don't kill enough. You could make deer season bow-only, statewide, all year-round, and the population will still never be kept in check.
Every county should be opened to rifles and handguns where safe to do so. Access to more public lands should be increased. The "safety zone" should be decreased to a more reasonable distance like 50 yards. All good. None will have as dramatic effect as increasing time available to gun hunters, though.