Go Back   Maryland Shooters > Gun Rights and Legislation > National 2A Issues
Don't Have An Account? Register Here

Join MD Shooters
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 10th, 2021, 10:34 AM #71
Bountied's Avatar
Bountied Bountied is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 2,136
Bountied Bountied is offline
Senior Member
Bountied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 2,136
When is this proposed to go into effect? Sorry if this is a dupe. You can print out form 4999 from the link if you want to score your things at home. I will be, just for poops and chuckles.
Bountied is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2021, 05:08 PM #72
lazarus lazarus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 7,300
lazarus lazarus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 7,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bountied View Post
When is this proposed to go into effect? Sorry if this is a dupe. You can print out form 4999 from the link if you want to score your things at home. I will be, just for poops and chuckles.
IIRC a minimum of 90 days after it is published in the federal register for comments. But they generally take in to account comments after the 90 day comment period and Will then publish the final regulation, which is, I think 30 days after the final is published. So figure likely between 5-8 months.
lazarus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2021, 06:39 PM #73
krucam's Avatar
krucam krucam is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 3rd Rock from the Sun...DFW, TX
Posts: 8,383
krucam krucam is online now
Senior Member
krucam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 3rd Rock from the Sun...DFW, TX
Posts: 8,383
The TX Atty General Ken Paxton sent a letter to Merrill Garland ATF opposing this today
https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov...gERERplU5V-Q7s
__________________
Mark C.

Dallas/Ft Worth, TX

Post McDonald Second Amendment Cases/Links HERE
krucam is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2021, 06:49 PM #74
Decoy's Avatar
Decoy Decoy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 4,303
Decoy Decoy is offline
Senior Member
Decoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 4,303
The founder of SB Tactical just said that the congressional research service has found that there may be as many as 10-40 MILLION pistol braces.

Decoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2021, 08:14 PM #75
outrider58's Avatar
outrider58 outrider58 is offline
My pronouns? IT of course
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 32,407
outrider58 outrider58 is offline
My pronouns? IT of course
outrider58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 32,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Decoy View Post
The founder of SB Tactical just said that the congressional research service has found that there may be as many as 10-40 MILLION pistol braces.

...and none are registered. like I said, no one's 'coming' for your braces.

And like I've been saying for years, stop going on u-toob, shooting your pistols while shouldering your braces.
__________________
Any comments made by me are made with the intent to spur discussion only.
Proceed on your own accord...
outrider58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2021, 09:14 PM #76
Decoy's Avatar
Decoy Decoy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 4,303
Decoy Decoy is offline
Senior Member
Decoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 4,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by krucam View Post
The TX Atty General Ken Paxton sent a letter to Merrill Garland ATF opposing this today…
https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov...gERERplU5V-Q7s
Thanks for posting that

Quote:
The Supreme Court, with the Caetano decision, found stun guns, with only 200,000 units in the United States, were in common use, and therefore protected under the Second Amendment.
I would think that 10 to 40 million makes them in common use.
Decoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2021, 11:26 PM #77
TinCuda's Avatar
TinCuda TinCuda is offline
Sky Captain
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 953
TinCuda TinCuda is offline
Sky Captain
TinCuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 953
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reezie View Post
civil war among who gun owners and none gun owners? dont think that will work
I understand your humor but I think these shenanigans are the first steps in dissolving this country and completely doing away with our Constitution. I honestly believe the left wants to force everyone into their controlled faux Utopia by any means.
TinCuda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2021, 11:34 PM #78
TinCuda's Avatar
TinCuda TinCuda is offline
Sky Captain
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 953
TinCuda TinCuda is offline
Sky Captain
TinCuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 953
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5cary View Post

Depending on sources, there are still up to 70% of the population that agrees in some form with controls on "Assault Weapons". That's the issue that will be the flash point for many.
I have seen some of these polls. The questions read like: Do you think that a two year old child should be allowed to play with a loaded full auto "assault rifle" with the safety off?

If you answer "NO" to the question, PRESTO!! You're now counted as pro gun control.
TinCuda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 11th, 2021, 12:28 AM #79
KIBarrister's Avatar
KIBarrister KIBarrister is online now
Opinionated Libertarian
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Kent Island, Maryland
Posts: 2,282
KIBarrister KIBarrister is online now
Opinionated Libertarian
KIBarrister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Kent Island, Maryland
Posts: 2,282
Quote:
Originally Posted by lazarus View Post
[...] its been the law for more than 80 years without the courts striking it down or congress getting rid of it since, Id say in the end the circumstances off the time did permit congress to make sure a law.
To be fair, Im not aware of a major court challenge to the NFA since Heller and its progeny. That is relevant because even though the 2A is a fundamental right, it has historically been given a lower level of scrutiny than what is due. I dont see how the NFA could survive strict scrutiny in front of any judge that actually knows the difference between their posterior and the ole hole in the ground.
KIBarrister is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 11th, 2021, 07:40 AM #80
pcfixer's Avatar
pcfixer pcfixer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Marylandstan
Posts: 4,879
pcfixer pcfixer is offline
Senior Member
pcfixer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Marylandstan
Posts: 4,879
Due process, or fairness, is one of the fundamental principles of United States democracy and the United States Constitution. Laws that violate your due process rights are thus considered to be unconstitutional. An ex post facto law is considered to be unconstitutional.

Ex post facto laws are expressly forbidden by the United States Constitution in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3 (with respect to federal laws) and Article 1, Section 10 (with respect to state laws).
__________________
Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of tyrannical government.

By the way I call it "moral obedience" rather than "civil disobedience" because it is God's law". Those who try to promote un-natural laws on us are committing moral disobedience. It is our duty to resist immoral laws and actions. By Richard Fry.
pcfixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Home Page > Forum List > Gun Rights and Legislation > National 2A Issues


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (2 members and 1 guests)
govwontletmebuycoolguns
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
2019, Congregate Media, LP Privacy Policy Terms of Service