DutchV
Ultimate Member
- Jul 8, 2012
- 4,730
I'm looking at two scopes, one from Burris and the other from Leupold. They're both top companies with great warranties, but these are their entry level scopes. I realize I'm not getting the best glass for $200. It'll go on a sporter weight .30-06 Mauser, so resistance to recoil is important. Overall ruggedness is also important, since this is a hunting rifle and may get banged around. Not on purpose, of course, but things happen. And while the warranty is great, it doesn't help when you're out in the woods.
Burris Fullfield II 3-9x40
http://swfa.com/Burris-3-9x40-Fullfield-II-Rifle-Scope-P7932.aspx
Leupold Rifleman 3-9x40 QDManager
http://swfa.com/Leupold-3-9x40-Rifleman-QDManager-Riflescope-P12126.aspx
Is one of these any better than the other? Is there something else to consider or should I just flip a coin? Not interested in spending much more than $200, unless of course both of these are downright awful.
Burris Fullfield II 3-9x40
http://swfa.com/Burris-3-9x40-Fullfield-II-Rifle-Scope-P7932.aspx
Leupold Rifleman 3-9x40 QDManager
http://swfa.com/Leupold-3-9x40-Rifleman-QDManager-Riflescope-P12126.aspx
Is one of these any better than the other? Is there something else to consider or should I just flip a coin? Not interested in spending much more than $200, unless of course both of these are downright awful.