jcutonilli
Ultimate Member
- Mar 28, 2013
- 2,474
Motion to dismiss
BUMP STOCK SUIT FILED!
- Thread starter esqappellate
- Start date
-
- Tags
- sb707 trigger activator
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
In layman’s terms please
danb
dont be a dumbass
Mostly seems like they are relying on the fact that you can store them out of state. And that this is a proper exercise of states police power.
This is the same argument that got shot down in CA. Well see.
This is the same argument that got shot down in CA. Well see.
danb
dont be a dumbass
"In stark contrast"!!!
Whenever a lawyer uses that phrase you know it isnt.
Seems like a pretty weak brief honestly. Possession is one of the key sticks of the property rights bundle. Didn't Roberts actually say that in one of his opinions recently? Seems like it sticks in my head.
Ive said their briefs were weak before. All they need to say really is "because guns"
Whenever a lawyer uses that phrase you know it isnt.
Seems like a pretty weak brief honestly. Possession is one of the key sticks of the property rights bundle. Didn't Roberts actually say that in one of his opinions recently? Seems like it sticks in my head.
Ive said their briefs were weak before. All they need to say really is "because guns"
jcutonilli
Ultimate Member
- Mar 28, 2013
- 2,474
They did not exactly answer the compliant. Instead they said that it was invalid and the court should dismiss the lawsuit.
Will this set a precedent for standard mags as well?
buellsfurn
Ultimate Member
that's exactly what i was thinking in the name of public safety
Only if it goes into the Fr*sh holes favor.
buellsfurn
Ultimate Member
let's hope he looses
danb
dont be a dumbass
Yes, seems likely this will define what they can do for magazines as well. Seems like they cut and paste Californias argument on magazines. CA s argument so far has been rejected. Even for CA this is a tough argument. Takings law is more well established than 2A law.
I’ll refrain from giving them more ideas and ask what the court date might be for Frosts appeal when he loses?
buellsfurn
Ultimate Member
so is this end Frosh has the last word
Not at all. Stay tuned.
No the judge has to decide on the motion to dismiss.
If the judge decides the case has credibility would that also give cause for an injunction or keep the law from going into effect?
Curious about all the references to storing/selling the devices out of state. Would that be MD forcing us to engauge in interstate commerce by one means or another? Maybe some forum lawyers can comment on this?
MD cannot force us to sell accross state lines (interstate commerce)
MD cannot force us to transport accross state lines (interstate commerce)
MD cannot force us to destroy our triggers (no compensation)
MD has no achievable grandfather clause.
Any way you slice the cake, we are screwed.
MD cannot force us to sell accross state lines (interstate commerce)
MD cannot force us to transport accross state lines (interstate commerce)
MD cannot force us to destroy our triggers (no compensation)
MD has no achievable grandfather clause.
Any way you slice the cake, we are screwed.
danb
dont be a dumbass
You can have them...outside MD is really a bizarre argument for a state as tiny as MD. If they were really so concerned they would say you have to turn them in.
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
Suggestions for a low powered, large objective rifle scope? (6 Viewers)- Started by E.Shell
- Replies: 10
-
-
Timonium Gun Show April 27-28 (Timonium Fairgrounds Exhibition Hall)
- Started by joro55
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
-