clandestine
AR-15 Savant
My Spidey senses tell me there will be lots of new threads soon about how "The MSP took my guns for no reason, but I do have a MJ Card'.
MEDICAL MARIJUANA?
- Thread starter FRANKCASTLE
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
- Status
jaybee
Ultimate Member
OK
lets face it, their goal is firearm restrictions by ordinary people in order to get rid of guns. MJ is just another opportunity to do this.
supply and demand ---- they believe if they can reduce demand for guns, the supply will go down
lets face it, their goal is firearm restrictions by ordinary people in order to get rid of guns. MJ is just another opportunity to do this.
supply and demand ---- they believe if they can reduce demand for guns, the supply will go down
- Dec 30, 2012
- 6,999
What guns? Got rid of mine at a Montgomery county church buyback.
clandestine
AR-15 Savant
The Pa State Police put an announcement on their website about people with the new medical marijuana card will have to dispose of their firearms. The cards will be issued starting in 2018. They can not buy firearms, possess firearms or ammunition and can not get a CCW. So it will now be a Felony to have a gun and legal pot but still an unclassified Misdemeanor possession charge to own a gun and illegal pot. I don't do marijuana and still won't even if it's legal so this doesn't effect my life but it will make lots of future felons. Here is the web address.
http://www.psp.pa.gov/firearms-information/Pages/Firearms-Information.aspx
http://www.psp.pa.gov/firearms-information/Pages/Firearms-Information.aspx
This will work, actually. People who live with felons can own firearms as long as the felon does not have ready access to the firearms. Walking by a prohibited person with a firearm does not make them in violation of the law.
jaybee
Ultimate Member
read the attachment again
http://www.psp.pa.gov/firearms-infor...formation.aspx
possessing firearms or ammunition.
Likewise, the mere possession of a Medical Marijuana Card will give rise to an inference that you are an “unlawful user of or addicted to” a controlled substance, pursuant to 27 C.F.R. § 478.11.
SO... having the card and a 22 bullet is a felony - amazing
BTW - I don't do MJ, never did but it's gotta be safer than some of the over the counter by prescription cocaine products or the herbal or mushrooms or powders available thru the US post office from china
JPG
Ultimate Member
Trump said that for each new regulation at least 2 need to be removed. Prediction:
Bump stocks banned (new regulation).
MJ removed from prohibited drugs (1 of at least 2 regulation to be removed)
Bump stocks banned (new regulation).
MJ removed from prohibited drugs (1 of at least 2 regulation to be removed)
dreadpirate
Ultimate Member
That is federal law, I believe he was asking for state law, since MSP does not enforce federal law.
I noticed that PSP references Federal law, but they don't reference PA law at all.
My wife started getting sick to her stomach after lunch and she mentioned that maybe she should talk to her pain management doc about an MJ card. I told her no you don't want to do that, and I told her why. She said OK, I'll just keep going to the pharmacy behind the pharmacy. She says they make criminals out of all of us don't they?
Removing MJ from prohibited drugs requires an Act of Congress ... that isn't blocked by the booze lobby ... good luck with that
DaemonAssassin
Why should we Free BSD?
Exactly. But this being MSP, they will probably do a blanket denial of anybody at the address, if a single occupant has a medical MJ card.
Since some questions on the MSP form 77 are asked because of federal firearms laws and you can be denied because you are in violation of those laws, it appears that they are enforcing federal law.
They do have that bug stuffed there!
https://www.yahoo.com/news/armed-data-officials-target-drug-dealing-doctors-143554668.html
The feds are using prescription data to bust doctors.
Would a physician be a prohibited person for prescribing MJ? (dealer)
Would a partner in a practice thar prescribes but he himself chooses not to prescribe - is he prohibited?
Are all the employees of the MJ dispensary prohibited persons? (How deep does this go?)
Are the banks of the dispensaries in violation of federal law?
Are any person dealing with the dispensary be in violation of federal law that would make them prohibited? (Aiding and abetting)
Can a power company provide services to a business that is violating a federal law?
Can a government employees lose his security clearance if family members are users?
It just gets crazy - but Frosh will be gainfully employed.
The police are not here to create disorder, they're here to preserve disorder.
Richard Daley
MJ market is growing, investors are making profits that may eventually rival the drug that kills the most each year (alcohol) and therefore lobbying will move this market forward and maybe the laws .... maybe, we'll see ...
Investor friends of mine are explaining incredible profits and now I, once again, can ride $300K+ horses that I do not own as proof of their success. I'm friggin shocked at the products/opportunities that are coming out and do truly believe in capitalism so.
Another thought/aspect, are these states (including ours!) another form of "Sanctuary"? have the Feds had any success against sanctuary cities? ... stay tuned as this will be interesting either way $$$.
ICBWrong.
Investor friends of mine are explaining incredible profits and now I, once again, can ride $300K+ horses that I do not own as proof of their success. I'm friggin shocked at the products/opportunities that are coming out and do truly believe in capitalism so.
Another thought/aspect, are these states (including ours!) another form of "Sanctuary"? have the Feds had any success against sanctuary cities? ... stay tuned as this will be interesting either way $$$.
ICBWrong.
Kinda wondering about that myself. Openly flaunting federal law... what's the difference if it's weed or illegal aliens? If the fed somehow gets the green light to withhold federal funds from states that provide sanctuary for illegal aliens, why not include states allowing folks to use illegal (under federal law) drugs?
Would this trigger another civil war? Would states secede from the union? Inquiring minds (at least one) wants to know.
Personally I think part of the reason md went with mm was to make as many people prohibited as possible. The other reason is so members of the mga could reap profits from it. I don’t know how they split that money up but didn’t the growers, processors and distributors all get representatives to “ help them” with getting their licenses?
- Status
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
-
-
Convicted For Building Guns; Judge says, “Do not bring the Second Amendment into this courtroom”- Started by Harrys
- Replies: 1
-
-
