Who makes a nice American made milspec 1911?

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Magnumite

    Ultimate Member
    Dec 17, 2007
    6,571
    Harford County, Maryland
    Springfield severed all ties with Brazil several years back. The forgings, who knows. There were several discussions about this in the 1911forum when the severance from IMBEL occurred. There a couple reliable speculations of the forging source.

    The Ruger is a good platform to work from. With minimal improvements both monetarily and in work time one could end up with a nice pistol. I have a CMD, cost me $720, I put $130 into it, some time in labor and have a nice pistol that performs excellently. Bought a low round count used earlier full size SR1911 for $500. $145 and some labor later same thing. The barrel fit on the fullsize is not as good as the very good fit on the CMD, but it shoots well. They are both finished, as in don’t need to do more to them. They are $300 more than the Mil Spec Defender and it shows.

    Still, the Mil Spec is the best game in town for the $$$.
     

    Attachments

    • 4C298F94-891A-4D48-818C-5C999CDAB6DE.jpeg
      4C298F94-891A-4D48-818C-5C999CDAB6DE.jpeg
      76.3 KB · Views: 169

    trickg

    Guns 'n Drums
    MDS Supporter
    Jul 22, 2008
    14,702
    Glen Burnie
    Springfield severed all ties with Brazil several years back. The forgings, who knows. There were several discussions about this in the 1911forum when the severance from IMBEL occurred. There a couple reliable speculations of the forging source.
    This is something that has come up in discussions I've seen online regarding American made vs [Insert country name here]. I think that there was a time where it really made a difference - there was a level of quality in American manufacture that just couldn't be replicated in other countries with any kind of reliability.

    I'm not so sure that holds to quite the same definition anymore. I'm all for buying American out of a sense of patriotism and support for the businesses in our country, but the gap between American quality and quality from countries in the southeast portion of the Eastern hemisphere has drastically diminished - over time metallurgy has gotten better, machining has gotten better due to CNC technology - technology in general is what has closed the gap.

    A friend of mine is a knife guy. For a while he was on a kick where he was buying a lot of Chinese made knives, particularly folders, and it was insane the level of quality he was getting for the money.

    I'm a trumpet player. My main trumpet was made in Taiwan, and IMO from a fit and finish perspective, it's better than what was coming out of Elkhart, IN from Conn/Selmer, and they are much more consistent from instrument to instrument. It used to be if you wanted a Bach Stradivarius trumpet (Made by Conn/Selmer) you really had to go play a bunch of them to find the one really good one because they were so inconsistent, and about a fourth of them were lemons.

    My next horn will be American made though, made by a company called S.E. Shires out of Massachusetts.

    Getting back to 1911s, again, maybe not Milspec, but from a quality perspective for the money, it's really hard to beat Dan Wesson, and they are American made. This is the DW A2 model, which is their closest offering to Milspec.

    Dan-Wesson-A2-e1543355293242.jpg
     

    Magnumite

    Ultimate Member
    Dec 17, 2007
    6,571
    Harford County, Maryland
    I understand the global economy thing. Its a reality and actually allows for good product development at competitive prices. Some like US made products but for some the affordabilty is an issue. Your DW is a great value, many feel the same of DW’s 1911’s. I like the products but is not affordable for many. Some will see DW made in US but also as the foreign entity they are. Same as Toyotas built in the US. I don’t have issue with that, I bought a Sig Nitron. One really needs to have each product standing on its own merits...and shortcomings...before selecting. The SA Mil Spec is exactly what the Made in America market needed in a 1911. It competes toe to toe with many of the offshore offerings which are good products in that market tier.
     

    Magnumite

    Ultimate Member
    Dec 17, 2007
    6,571
    Harford County, Maryland
    Ddn’t want to be preachy there, agreeing really. Do you prefer that rear sight on a mil spec pattern pistol? Or was it that’s what they offer in a mil spec type pistol?
     
    Last edited:

    trickg

    Guns 'n Drums
    MDS Supporter
    Jul 22, 2008
    14,702
    Glen Burnie
    Ddn’t want to be preachy there, agreeing really. Do you prefer that rear sight on a mil spec pattern pistol? Or wad it that’s what they offer in a mil spec type pistol?
    Neither of my Dan Wessons are the A2 model - I just posted that as a comparison.

    FWIW, if I wanted a mil-spec gun, I'd probably go looking for an actual M1911A1 - Colt, Remington-Rand - whatever. Or, I'd get the Springfield. My BIL has CMP Remington-Rand that's in remarkably good shape for being a surplus military 1911.

    My thought is that the sights on a mil-spec will get the job done, but I'm not gonna lie - having tritium vials or combat-style dots makes for faster and easier target acquisition, especially in lower light.

    These are my DWs.
     

    Attachments

    • 97AC5EDB-9CCE-4515-8D9F-3C27EC0A0D51.jpg
      97AC5EDB-9CCE-4515-8D9F-3C27EC0A0D51.jpg
      79.9 KB · Views: 150

    Michigander08

    ridiculous and psychotic
    MDS Supporter
    May 29, 2017
    7,741
    Just clarifying? I thought MIL_SPEC meant the lowest bidder.:innocent0

    I thought so too but then I read somewhere that it also means they all agree on tolerance numbers when it come to fit between parts.

    A mil spec part from colt will fit with mil spec part from Ruger or Windham or PSA.
     

    MiddleRiverShootist

    Active Member
    Jan 18, 2015
    644
    Baltimore Co
    Don’t think I heard anyone mention Ruger? Haven’t seen many unreliable Ruger firearms ever. Have held their 1911’s always thought I may pick one up someday- disclaimer I do have or have owned a bunch of different Rugers over the years.
    I have a Ruger full size i got used,, Love it! and a 4.25 Taurus 1911 both great shooters and 100% reliable
     

    Darkemp

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Aug 18, 2009
    7,811
    Marylandistan
    This one of mine is milspec.

    Early 1945 Remington Rand M1911A1 serial number 205xxxx. It is "P" and "FJA" marked properly, faint Crossed Cannons on right frame in correct location, "X" and "N" on the right trigger guard and a "3" on the left trigger guard. Small parts appear to be correct based on the examples I've matched it to, and the slide is correct type III Rand. Barrel is marked "S" over "P", looks like from what I read a Springfield barrel which can be correct to the Rands as well or a field replacement. Magazine is an "S" marked Scoville, correct for a Rand as well. Serial number is digitally blocked in the photos.

    Pistol Belt also in the pics is an original with a 1942 Sears M1916 holster.
     

    Attachments

    • EB6B45D6-C5D6-42E1-9C07-295ED823F65F.jpg
      EB6B45D6-C5D6-42E1-9C07-295ED823F65F.jpg
      69.9 KB · Views: 117
    Jul 1, 2012
    5,733
    Chad always recommended American Classic brand. I don't know if they have a GI model or not.

    Ironically made by Metro Arms out of the Phillipines and imported.

    The closest to MILSPEC is their Government but it looks like even that has a lot of non-traditional parts. But I guess it boils down to what is meant by "MILSPEC", whether it is just:
    - parts interchange with other MILSPEC 1911's
    or includes:
    - design is faithful to the original 1911/1911-A1/Government Model

    To me it's both.

    Note the American Classic II is "100% MILSPEC" but is a far cry from the original JMB design / A1 modifications, and "includes many add-ons found on custom pistols" :)
     

    Magnumite

    Ultimate Member
    Dec 17, 2007
    6,571
    Harford County, Maryland
    ^^^. The Metros seem to be a decent gun. I saw one in a fellow shooter’s holster once and thought it was a Colt. Very nice blue.

    Its been over 100 years. Many improvements have been made to the ‘mil spec’ 1911 while staying with the basic design of the original. One of the first things I addressed on my first 1911, a 1918 warhorse, was barrel fit and the trigger. Quickly followed by - despite sharper younger eyes - the sights. I shot it that way for a long time. This pattern seems to be more the ‘modern’ milspec.

    Currently there are ‘retro’ guns incorporating some type of abbreviated beavertail grip safety with a bobbed WWII GI hanmer. I would call these more minimalist guns.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,405
    Messages
    7,280,393
    Members
    33,450
    Latest member
    angel45z

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom