CZ TAIJI
Member
i just read this on MSI website in the section on Bills that had not past .
"We testified on the bill to advise about federal law, but took no position on the bill."
so, i'm asking why won't MSI take a position and why testify about federal law if they only intend to remain mute on the actual statute itself ?
now, we all know anybody who personally or knows others who would be affected by this would want to retain their 2nd amendment rights. that's not hard to figure out.
Yet, in my opinion we have an issues that an Organization like MSI is involved with but won't speak on so far as in support or not of the statute.
I'm saying this because whomever seems/is perceived to speaks for us matters in political issues and the making of new statutes. I say if they are going to support Those medical users as they should then say so and if not then get out of the way and let others take up that fight that you as MSI don't seem to want to do.
to me it's like politicians who won't support what their constituents/the people want and instead have a hands off policy that thwarts the will of the people. ijs
"We testified on the bill to advise about federal law, but took no position on the bill."
so, i'm asking why won't MSI take a position and why testify about federal law if they only intend to remain mute on the actual statute itself ?
now, we all know anybody who personally or knows others who would be affected by this would want to retain their 2nd amendment rights. that's not hard to figure out.
Yet, in my opinion we have an issues that an Organization like MSI is involved with but won't speak on so far as in support or not of the statute.
I'm saying this because whomever seems/is perceived to speaks for us matters in political issues and the making of new statutes. I say if they are going to support Those medical users as they should then say so and if not then get out of the way and let others take up that fight that you as MSI don't seem to want to do.
to me it's like politicians who won't support what their constituents/the people want and instead have a hands off policy that thwarts the will of the people. ijs
