randomuser
Ultimate Member
The antis already have a roadmap. It just takes time to drive across the country. Look at California.
non regulated firearms tracking in MD
- Thread starter Muleskinner
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
I don't see CA as a roadmap as much as it is one of several ongoing experiments by the antis. Other experiments include NY, NJ, IL, DC, HI, and of course, MD. Each trying slightly different approaches to their endgame. They pushed too hard in DC and lost, but so far the rest of them are moving along. NY may be the next to define the boundary of "too far, too fast" after SCOTUS gets through with their "no transport" law. But IL's FOID has survived since 1968, so it's a baseline for the antis of something courts will let them get away with. Hence the HQL and now the attempt at LGQL.
Last edited:
I was one of those 400+ guests. I'm not letting my employer's key logging software record my password.
Jake4U
Now with 67% more FJB
- Sep 1, 2018
- 1,161
They didn't grandfather echo triggers. They are running wild on the streets of unconstitutional roadmaps and I don't see what will stop them. The communists seek to disarm us. There is no other way to interpret it.
Muleskinner
Ultimate Member
Some here believe there are spys among us and there might be...but there are plenty of ways to get info to further any nefarious agenda. ..and I personally don't give a rat's ass if the libs see what they might consider threats. I'm quit sure if they come here to soy, they probably have enough posts to enter the WC.
And they would certainly have enough cash to buy into any pay site.
Let's hope that what I just posted elsewhere comes to pass a little more often - overcoming ignorance and learning their base premise is flawed is a danger to them.
Post count isn't the answer (at all).
I don't care what anyone else thinks either, until they're able to use it against me due to someone blabbering.
Might as well have been a neon sign posted here pointing to the fact that an HBAR is still an "assault rifle" (per popular description).
For years I've heard about a "gun show" loophole, never actually even been to a show but I've certainly done a lot of fully legal FTF long gun transfers.
nomade
Active Member
- Apr 26, 2014
- 351
I do the same. I log in only in my personal computer or phone.
Tungsten
Ultimate Member
If the Annapolis Commies read the board, then that makes it a lot easier for us to directly communicate with our "representatives."
Are we really sure they can read?
I've heard they use White Out to correct mistakes in their Wordstar documents.
One more reason to be concerned about HB0740- not only will there be no more 80 lowers or anything else non-trackable, existing 80 builds will need to get serialized and (I assume) put into the system.
They are trying to force everyone to "get on the list".
Does anyone remember the "beltway sniper" case in October, 2002? MSP knocked on the door of everyone who had bought an AR-15 AFTER THAT MODEL HAD BECOME A "REGULATED FIREARM". Those who owned an AR-15 when it was just a "rifle" didn't get visited.
Federal law prohibits the federal government from maintaining computer records of firearms purchasers. Of course, there is no restriction on what MSP can keep.
Federal law prohibits the federal government from maintaining computer records of firearms purchasers. Of course, there is no restriction on what MSP can keep.
No, they will be banned. There will be no serializing. The law bans any firearm made that doesn’t have a serial number from a licensed manufacturer or importer. I assume you are neither.
How is this not a taking under the 5th amendment? You can't sell an unserialized firearm before the deadline because that's illegal under federal law. If we also have no avenue to serialize the thing legally before the deadline, AND there's no grandfather clause (since the date specified was 86), we're stuck with destroying the thing, which denies us any value from ownership of the property.
They already set that precedent. With Bumpstocks.
Yep. If I had built any 80% firearms, they would have been built with very good quality parts and would have cost a lot of money.
Iirc, prior to the ATF's most recent decision it would have been legal to sell a bumpstock out of state, so you could be compensated that way. The owner of a finished 80 has no such recourse, since that would break federal law.
Unless you're talking about the ATF's decision itself. Re that, I'm surprised it didn't happen sooner.
