Stossel: NYC Government Traumatizes Gun Owners

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Engine4

    Curmudgeon
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 30, 2012
    6,999
    Gee, why don't we shop around for a conservative judge that'll rule those laws invalid?
     

    j_h_smith

    Ultimate Member
    Jul 28, 2007
    28,516
    :thumbsup: The legislatures pass all these laws with no clue what practical impact they have on law abiding citizens. In fact they don't really care because they are deluded in thinking that criminals will honor the laws they pass. Few of our legislators are guided by a moral compass,

    I have my doubts if they even consider the criminal act when they make these types of laws. I think it's just a ploy to show their constituents that they are willing to try anything. It's the citizens of the state that are allowing this to happen.

    When the citizens see that these laws aren't working, they should demand REAL reform and tougher penalties. But they just want to be led by the career politician until the day they die.

    All you have to do is look at Baltimore City. Has ANYTHING the Libs passed into law EVER helped with the crime in the city? No. But the citizens keep voting for the same politicians without even thinking about REAL reform.
     

    wabbit

    Ultimate Member
    Apr 29, 2010
    5,269
    Can we blame the prosecutor for failing to exercise discretion? Don't officers of the court swear to uphold the COTUS?

    I suppose I'm being naive. It's an elected position, presumably, and subject to pressure from the tyrants of the majority.

    The prosecutor in New York did exercise his discretion in prosecuting the woman. See the video again, she had an UNLOADED gun, with the ammunition in a separate box in her luggage. The prosecutor deemed this constituted a loaded firearm. The law didn't say so, he said so, and prosecuted according to this.
     

    Jim12

    Let Freedom Ring
    MDS Supporter
    Jan 30, 2013
    34,055
    The prosecutor in New York did exercise his discretion in prosecuting the woman. See the video again, she had an UNLOADED gun, with the ammunition in a separate box in her luggage. The prosecutor deemed this constituted a loaded firearm. The law didn't say so, he said so, and prosecuted according to this.

    See the video again at 4:30-4:40. The prosecutor said that they were "together," and that under NY law, if they're together, they're loaded. He didn't make it up, at least according to him.
     

    rbird7282

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 6, 2012
    18,700
    Columbia
    This is why legislatures are the problem. The wording in laws have become ridiculous. Because ammunition and a gun are "together" does not mean it's loaded and any normal, rational person would understand that. No different than DC law stating that any part of a cartridge or shotshell is ammunition. Maryland does the same stupid shit with their laws as well. Only in MD can an SBR be a rifle AND a handgun.
     

    yellowfin

    Pro 2A Gastronome
    Jul 30, 2010
    1,516
    Lancaster, PA
    :thumbsup: The legislatures pass all these laws with no clue what practical impact they have on law abiding citizens. In fact they don't really care because they are deluded in thinking that criminals will honor the laws they pass.
    Nonsense. They know full well what they're doing and it's deliberately malicious. It's purposeful hate laws designed to spite whom they disfavor.
    few of our legislators are guided by a moral compass,
    Quite the contrary, they very much are, it's just a completely 180 inverted one.
     

    esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,408
    Or, he could have decided, as there wasn't really a mens rea,
    not to charge in the first place.

    I haven't looked it up, but I doubt that the mens rea for these "crimes" is, at most, anything more than a knowing possession. These individuals knowingly possessed, they just didn't know it was illegal. While some statutes require that level of mens rea, they are rare.
     

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,466
    Westminster USA
    The issue is they flew TO NYC not through it., Once NYC is your destination, NYC law applies. The DA did what big city liberals always do, make an example of you until they are made to look like rabid nut jobs. Then they acquiesce and reduce to charges to misdemeanors and blame the legislture. They have discretion, but I don't see them just dropping charges, that's not their job. They prosecute. Fair or not.

    NYC gun laws are only slightly more ridiculous than MD. If someone did the same thing while in MD, the exact same thing could happen here.

    If you are a gun owner who travels, you need to know the laws of your DESTINATION state.

    While not exactly the same, Google Revell vs Port Authority of NY and NJ.

    Stossel is right, but it's not going to change NY and NJ 's dumb behavior.

    Revell was nailed for taking POSSESSION of his firearm from the airline when his flight was cancelled and he had to stay overnight in a hotel. The court ruled when he took possession he broke the law and had no FOPA protection.

    Stupid? absolutely biut it didn't stop his arrest, conviction and thousands of dollars in legal fees.

    Travel with a gun? Read the laws and Google a little bit. Could save thousands of dollars and many headaches. Sad but that's the reality of living with liberal twits.
     

    JohnnyE

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jan 18, 2013
    9,617
    MoCo
    The issue is they flew TO NYC not through it., Once NYC is your destination, NYC law applies. The DA did what big city liberals always do, make an example of you until they are made to look like rabid nut jobs. Then they acquiesce and reduce to charges to misdemeanors and blame the legislture. They have discretion, but I don't see them just dropping charges, that's not their job. They prosecute. Fair or not.

    NYC gun laws are only slightly more ridiculous than MD. If someone did the same thing while in MD, the exact same thing could happen here.

    If you are a gun owner who travels, you need to know the laws of your DESTINATION state.

    While not exactly the same, Google Revell vs Port Authority of NY and NJ.

    Stossel is right, but it's not going to change NY and NJ 's dumb behavior.

    Revell was nailed for taking POSSESSION of his firearm from the airline when his flight was cancelled and he had to stay overnight in a hotel. The court ruled when he took possession he broke the law and had no FOPA protection.

    Stupid? absolutely biut it didn't stop his arrest, conviction and thousands of dollars in legal fees.

    Travel with a gun? Read the laws and Google a little bit. Could save thousands of dollars and many headaches. Sad but that's the reality of living with liberal twits.
    Perhaps he could have found protection under FOPA if, rather than overnighting in a NY hotel, he picked up his luggage with gun, got a rental car, and drove into another, more gun-friendly, state for the night. He may then have had a colorable argument that his time in NY was spent just passing through.
     

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,466
    Westminster USA
    DOJ agrees with you. But getting NY and NJ to agree is not so easy, if those states are your destination.
    .
    .
     

    Attachments

    • DOJltrTSA.pdf
      235.5 KB · Views: 105
    Last edited:

    GlocksAndPatriots

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Aug 29, 2016
    763
    This type of thing is going to continue until we become the people the left accuses us of being.

    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
     

    Schipperke

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 19, 2013
    18,751
    DOJ agrees with you. But getting NY and NJ to agree is not so easy
    .
    .

    My first wonder. I thought there were laws about travelling through crazy areas were OK if you keep on, keeping on and not staying.
     

    GlocksAndPatriots

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Aug 29, 2016
    763
    Even tho DOJ might agree its NY and NJ State that is the trouble point. Its STATE Firearms laws that is causing the trouble not fed laws. Until the NY and NJ State Leg change the state laws people will still get into trouble...

    They won't change their laws unless a federal court voids them or a federal law preempts them. It's that simple.
     

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,466
    Westminster USA
    The problem is when one of these states becomes your destination. Then you are at their mercy and have no FOPA protection. The DOJ letter agrees that passing through is OK. But state laws apply when they become your destination. That's what some folks don't seem to get.
     

    Blacksmith101

    Grumpy Old Man
    Jun 22, 2012
    22,269
    Actually, his attitude is quite typical of prosecutors everywhere. It's a "I didn't make the law, my job is just to enforce it". That these two got off with such a light (non-disqualifying) charge is actually an indication that the prosecutor exerised his discretion appropriately. Don't blame a prosecutor for being a prosecutor.

    Is it a prosecutors and even a judges job to enforce a law passed by a legislature and signed by a Governor that violates the constitution of either the state or the United States?

    In anticipation of an answer about who the arbitrator of constitutionality is a second question. Can a despot keep promulgating laws in violation of constitutional protections that will be blindly enforced for years as they make seemingly glacier like progress through the court system to be ultimately rejected only to be replaced with an equally odious law to once again start the progress all over again ad infinitum?

    just trying to make a point.
     

    Engine4

    Curmudgeon
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 30, 2012
    6,999
    These state by state issues are exactly the reason the Feds or scotus need to rule that states cannot make laws against rights enumerated in the BoR. State's rights should not apply here.
     

    GlocksAndPatriots

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Aug 29, 2016
    763
    The problem is when one of these states becomes your destination. Then you are at their mercy and have no FOPA protection. The DOJ letter agrees that passing through is OK. But state laws apply when they become your destination. That's what some folks don't seem to get.

    Right, but define "destination." If I live in Seattle, and am going on a camping trip in Vermont, and the nearest airport is Albany, and my plan is to land in Albany, rent a car, and drive to Vermont, it wouldn't really be accurate to say that New York is my destination, would it? In any case, this ambiguity shows why we need reciprocity plus a strengthened FOPA.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,429
    Messages
    7,281,451
    Members
    33,452
    Latest member
    J_Gunslinger

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom