If your a prohibited person your not allowed to have firearms or ammo nor mags....why is this bill even needed?
It's not. These people are beyond retarded
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If your a prohibited person your not allowed to have firearms or ammo nor mags....why is this bill even needed?
So the sky isn't falling (at least in MD when it comes to >10 mag possession bans)?
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
Pheew.Not unless you are a prohibited person already
So the sky isn't falling (at least in MD when it comes to >10 mag possession bans)?
So the sky isn't falling (at least in MD when it comes to >10 mag possession bans)?
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
Hard to say. Claim they will withdraw or amend it, but it could be a trick.
So the sky isn't falling (at least in MD when it comes to >10 mag possession bans)?
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
What would be the purpose of a trick? D's have veto-proof majority in both MGA houses. No need for tricks, as long as M&M support a bill.
They ain't done yet!
Hard to say. Claim they will withdraw or amend it, but it could be a trick.
Don't count the antis out just yet...it ain't over.
Gotcha. At least the hearings went favorably on this topic, it seems.
But agree that certain activist groups might light up the phones of the legislators and try to sway them still.
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
Although many of the speakers are passionate, some are not helping. Need to stay focused on criminalizing innocents for possession of > 10 round mags.
Although many of the speakers are passionate, some are not helping. Need to stay focused on criminalizing innocents for possession of > 10 round mags.