Straightshooter
Ultimate Member
This is actually good news. It shows intent to comply with the clarification requested by the AG. Doesn't mean they won't drag their feet, or try other shenanigans, however, if anything, it shows they are cognizant of the decision, upcoming changes, and clarification.
I look at it as an attempt to ignore the decision for as long as possible. The decision said that no applicant may be required to provide G&S yet Shipley says their decisions will not be made solely on G&S. The court said not at all.
Shipley said
will not be making any permit decisions solely on the "good and substantial reason" requirement until "the court clarifies its position"
This is why my brain automaticly translates the term "Spokesperson" to "Official Liar".