MPA10SST Defender Legal?

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    erwos

    erwos

    The Hebrew Hammer
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 25, 2009
    13,886
    Rockville, MD
    No, if the DMG model had been submitted, it would have said the DMG model. Their record keeping is not that bad.
     
    Waz

    Waz

    SHAZAM!!!
    Dec 15, 2012
    693
    Glen Burnie-ish
    i think that could be part of the problem. the roster doesnt have a model number. it only says "defender" which is pretty much MPAs entire handgun series
     
    protegeV

    protegeV

    Ready to go
    Apr 3, 2011
    46,880
    TX
    Waz said:
    i think that could be part of the problem. the roster doesnt have a model number. it only says "defender" which is pretty much MPAs entire handgun series
    Click to expand...

    This. If they want to play the "all versions" game on what is banned, then it should work the same when they are vague with the approved handgun roster.
     
    StantonCree

    StantonCree

    Watch your beer
    Jan 23, 2011
    23,932
    Took mine out today. It’s an insanely stupid gun, ergos are crap, obviously too heavy, trigger pull is wellll it’s there, and the mag takes a guy with 20’ biceps to load but it was fun.

    I’ll never shoot it again but i like having it and really wanted one. It did fire as i cocked the bolt and dropped it home which was very unnerving (WWB 115gn).
     
    1

    1841DNG

    Ultimate Member
    Apr 17, 2016
    1,143
    I am not a lawyer and would certainly not want to be a test case but at least ethically the entrapment comparison feels accurate to me. Not saying that this is legally the true but if the Roster Board lists it as ok and an FFL sold it any prosecution would strike me as cruel and vindictive. I would not vote to convict if I was on a jury anyway. In the end though the important thing is that the gun looks scary and is therefore more dangerous.
     
    StantonCree

    StantonCree

    Watch your beer
    Jan 23, 2011
    23,932
    1841DNG said:
    I am not a lawyer and would certainly not want to be a test case but at least ethically the entrapment comparison feels accurate to me. Not saying that this is legally the true but if the Roster Board lists it as ok and an FFL sold it any prosecution would strike me as cruel and vindictive. I would not vote to convict if I was on a jury anyway. In the end though the important thing is that the gun looks scary and is therefore more dangerous.
    Click to expand...

    It’s on the list
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
    South Carroll Guns banner ad Maryland

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,554
    Messages
    7,286,193
    Members
    33,476
    Latest member
    Spb5205

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom