85MikeTPI
Ultimate Member
If you've ever loaded 357sig, you probably know the struggle with max COAL and bullet ogive. If you haven't, you may want to skip this post.
The RMR Matchwinners are my favorite projectile for loading 357sig, their straight bearing and sharp 12deg angled flat-nose meets the stringent 357sig COAL with full neck contact on the bearing surface. BUT, the case neck is usually right at the nose transition when seated to COAL and variances in brass length can have the crimp (FCD) slightly folding over the start of the nose ogive.
So I found some 125gr factory seconds in .357 that didn't get the cannelure on them, but even the ones that did, have a high cannelure. The best thing, the flat-nose is a 14deg design that saves almost 2mm from the nose length and allows sub-maxCOAL and still has bearing surface beyond the case neck. This also allowed the projectiles with cannelures to seat under maxCOAL and not affect bearing surface or crimp.. (I did resize them to .356", but it usually doesn't matter much)
I'm going to fire a test batch I made up, this coming weekend. The main problem is if they work out, I'm not sure if I can find out who the Mfg is, to try and get more.
Below pics show both seated to 1.130" which is under the max 1.140" COAL
The RMR Matchwinners are my favorite projectile for loading 357sig, their straight bearing and sharp 12deg angled flat-nose meets the stringent 357sig COAL with full neck contact on the bearing surface. BUT, the case neck is usually right at the nose transition when seated to COAL and variances in brass length can have the crimp (FCD) slightly folding over the start of the nose ogive.
So I found some 125gr factory seconds in .357 that didn't get the cannelure on them, but even the ones that did, have a high cannelure. The best thing, the flat-nose is a 14deg design that saves almost 2mm from the nose length and allows sub-maxCOAL and still has bearing surface beyond the case neck. This also allowed the projectiles with cannelures to seat under maxCOAL and not affect bearing surface or crimp.. (I did resize them to .356", but it usually doesn't matter much)
I'm going to fire a test batch I made up, this coming weekend. The main problem is if they work out, I'm not sure if I can find out who the Mfg is, to try and get more.
Below pics show both seated to 1.130" which is under the max 1.140" COAL