Obama Modified HIPPA to "strenghten" NICS

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • clandestine

    AR-15 Savant
    Oct 13, 2008
    37,032
    Elkton, MD
    This showed up briefly on CMS.gov. Then it vanished. :sad20::sad20:
    http://blog.cms.gov/2016/01/04/obam...rengthen-the-firearm-background-check-system/

    http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=201510&RIN=0945-AA05

    CMS.GOV said:
    Obama administration modifies HIPAA to strengthen the firearm background check system

    January 4

    By: Jocelyn Samuels, Director of the Office for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

    Today the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) moved forward on commitments made by President Obama to curb gun violence across the nation. Specifically, we have modified the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule to expressly permit certain covered entities to disclose to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) the identities of those individuals who, for mental health reasons, already are prohibited by Federal law from having a firearm.

    Due to a history of under-reporting, the NICS has lacked complete information about all individuals who are prohibited by Federal law from possessing or receiving a firearm. The modification announced today better enables the reporting of the identities of prohibited individuals to the background check system and is an important step toward improving the public’s safety while continuing to strongly protect individuals’ privacy interests.

    Specifically, this final rule gives States improved flexibility to ensure accurate but limited information is reported to the NICS. The rulemaking makes clear that, under the Privacy Rule, certain covered entities are permitted to disclose limited information to the NICS. The information that can be disclosed is the minimum necessary identifying information about individuals who have been involuntarily committed to a mental institution or otherwise have been determined by a lawful authority to be a danger to themselves or others or to lack the mental capacity to manage their own affairs.

    The new modification is carefully and narrowly tailored to preserve the patient-provider relationship and ensure that individuals are not discouraged from seeking voluntary treatment. This rule applies only to a small subset of HIPAA covered entities that either make the mental health determinations that disqualify individuals from having a firearm or are designated by their States to report this information to NICS – and it allows such entities to report only limited identifying, non-clinical information to the NICS.

    The rule does not apply to most treating providers and does not allow reporting of diagnostic, clinical, or other mental health treatment information.

    It is important to note that the vast majority of Americans with mental health conditions are not violent and that those with mental illness are in fact more likely to be victims than perpetrators. An individual who seeks help for mental health problems or receives mental health treatment is not automatically legally prohibited from having a firearm; nothing in this final rule changes that. HHS continues to support efforts by the Administration to dispel negative attitudes and misconceptions relating to mental illness and to encourage individuals to seek voluntary mental health treatment. Learn more about mental health resources and recovery at http://www.mentalhealth.gov.

    The Final Rule is available for review at: http://www.federalregister.gov.

    Want to comment on this Blog? Visit our Twitter page @HHSOCR to share your thoughts and start a conversation.
     

    clandestine

    AR-15 Savant
    Oct 13, 2008
    37,032
    Elkton, MD
    SCREENSHOT
     

    Attachments

    • HIPPA.jpg
      HIPPA.jpg
      101.7 KB · Views: 1,032

    protegeV

    Ready to go
    Apr 3, 2011
    46,880
    TX
    Starts out sounding fair enough, but then goes off the deep end.

    Have guns, but want to get yourself some psych help? Better rethink that... :mad54:
     

    clandestine

    AR-15 Savant
    Oct 13, 2008
    37,032
    Elkton, MD
    http://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2014/...then-the-federal-background-check-system.html



    https://www.federalregister.gov/art...rivacy-rule-and-the-national-instant-criminal
    SNIP said:
    Among the persons
    subject to the Federal mental health prohibitor established under the Gun Control Act of
    1968 and implementing regulations issued by the Department of Justice (DOJ) are
    individuals who have been involuntarily committed to a mental institution; found
    incompetent to stand trial or not guilty by reason of insanity; or otherwise have been
    determined by a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority to be a danger to
    themselves or others or to lack the mental capacity to contract or manage their own
    affairs, as a result of marked subnormal intelligence or mental illness, incompetency,
    condition, or disease. Under this final rule, only covered entities with lawful authority to
    make the adjudications or commitment decisions that make individuals subject to the
    Federal mental health prohibitor, or that serve as repositories of information for NICS
    reporting purposes, are permitted to disclose the information needed for these purposes.
    The disclosure is restricted to limited demographic and certain other information needed
    for NICS purposes. The rule specifically prohibits the disclosure of diagnostic or clinical
    information, from medical records or other sources, and any mental health information
    beyond the indication that the individual is subject to the Federal mental health
    prohibitor.
     
    Feb 28, 2013
    28,953
    Wait a minute.

    The Muslim-in-Chief acknowledges the existence of NICS, yet insists there's a problem with guns being sold without background checks.

    Sounds like someone speaks with forked tongue.
     

    dtmeyers

    Active Member
    Jun 22, 2013
    329
    Well now people will be less prone to go seek help for fear some hoplophobic doctor will say they are a danger to themselves or others. Way to scare people in NOT going to the doctor.
     

    BeoBill

    Crank in the Third Row
    MDS Supporter
    Oct 3, 2013
    27,201
    南馬里蘭州鮑伊
    That just seems to me to be countermanding the will of Congress. HHS can't rewrite the HIPPA, no matter how much Dear Leader wants them to.
     
    Feb 28, 2013
    28,953
    Well now people will be less prone to go seek help for fear some hoplophobic doctor will say they are a danger to themselves or others. Way to scare people in NOT going to the doctor.

    Funny how often the only law libtards can produce that actually does make a difference is the law of unintended consequences.
     

    Jim12

    Let Freedom Ring
    MDS Supporter
    Jan 30, 2013
    34,121
    Of course, in the good old days of the Soviet Union and other Marxist regimes, anyone who dared to disagree with the official line decreed by the State was deemed insane and involuntarily committed to a mental institution. If they were lucky. That could never happen here, not in a million years. :sarcasm:
     

    CrazyIvan

    Crazy Ivan
    Aug 2, 2013
    158
    Scaggsville (Howard County)
    Of course, in the good old days of the Soviet Union and other Marxist regimes, anyone who dared to disagree with the official line decreed by the State was deemed insane and involuntarily committed to a mental institution. If they were lucky. That could never happen here, not in a million years. :sarcasm:

    Mental institution? I thought Siberia is where the insane were sent in Mother Russia. ;-)

    Seriously though, this HIPAA modification scares me. I work for a healthcare organization that owns several hospitals, one of which is a psychiatric facility. I will have a hard time releasing any information that violates the original interpretation of HIPAA. Sad part is, if anyones information is given out and the interpretation changes back, then the government can screw both the patients by taking away their rights and the hospital for violating HIPAA. Sigh
     

    Jim12

    Let Freedom Ring
    MDS Supporter
    Jan 30, 2013
    34,121
    Mental institution? I thought Siberia is where the insane were sent in Mother Russia. ;-)

    Seriously though, this HIPAA modification scares me. I work for a healthcare organization that owns several hospitals, one of which is a psychiatric facility. I will have a hard time releasing any information that violates the original interpretation of HIPAA. Sad part is, if anyones information is given out and the interpretation changes back, then the government can screw both the patients by taking away their rights and the hospital for violating HIPAA. Sigh

    The less lucky--and more common.

    Make everybody a criminal, so you have grounds to go after whoever disagrees with you. It's what we're becoming.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,584
    Messages
    7,287,332
    Members
    33,480
    Latest member
    navyfirefighter1981

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom