Yeah, I had some respect once upon a time too, until he wrote, "Show the respect due." If anybody has to ask for respect, well...................
Then, along came the opinion in his clamored for MSI/Brockman v. Hogan litigation. Maybe one needs to be an attorney to understand the intricacies of why this result is so bad and why the case itself was NOT the right one to litigate. Heck, Art3, a serious PP advocate, has not even found the time to read the opinion, which came down in the middle of November 2018. Meanwhile, little old me went ahead and read it. What happens to us in Maryland IF SCOTUS does not reverse this opinion for 50+ years, or ever? Meanwhile, ATF has banned bumpstocks too across the nation. Who knows, maybe this will head right to SCOTUS after the 4th Circuit, SCOTUS will overturn it, the ATF's position will be overturned next, and I will be eating humble pie with a smile on my face. Doubtful, but possible. Kind of like how Kolbe was actually a winner at the 4th Circuit for a brief moment, and I told my wife about it with a smile on my face. Of course, her response was, "So, we didn't really have to buy all those guns in 2013?" Of course, the en banc review of Kolbe made my smile go away and justified the 2013 purchases. SCOTUS refused to grant cert on that one.
As far as MSI being a plaintiff in the Brockman matter, that was a bad move too. Absolutely no reason for it. It brought up an issue of standing for MSI and it also put a corporate entity front and center in the litigation. Read up on how Heller was conducted:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller
Hear, Hear!!!!!!!
There, There!!!!!!!!!
I really hope you guys change some minds with the scofflaw shirts in Annapolis. Again, doubtful, but possible.
Can one really say in the same breath, "I am a law abiding gun owner that will not comply/abide with any more gun control laws?" Can one really say that?
I know I said it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk