shadow116
2nd Class Citizen
If you read carefully, the guidance only applies to contractors, not federal employees.
Read What? Still have not seen anything but rumors and puling.
If you read carefully, the guidance only applies to contractors, not federal employees.
Read What? Still have not seen anything but rumors and puling.
Have you ever stayed in a hotel with no room service and have someone knock on your door saying it's room service? I have
Have you ever been followed overseas? I have
Have you ever had someone go to a neighbor's house and ask if you still worked for the FAA? I have
I know a little about threats.
I've also worked in a SCIF. I drove home from one everyday.
I don't see the danger. Give me an example.
The notice was sent to CSSOs. In short, they are not allowed to confirm clearance level any more.
I was provided a reason, that goes being what’s on the paper/pdf floating around. Is bs but... it’s a reason. Hold us all responsible for the acts of a few. Your CSSO can investigate and provide the reason with names redacted for privacy if you need/want more info.
If you’re CSSO doesn’t have the info, give them a week and have them check their spam folders lol. Its coming.
My additional disappointment... is that it doesn’t stop “employees”, only contractors and calls or “personal gain”. Nothing like open discrimination.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Have you ever stayed in a hotel with no room service and have someone knock on your door saying it's room service? I have
Have you ever been followed overseas? I have
Have you ever had someone go to a neighbor's house and ask if you still worked for the FAA? I have
I know a little about threats.
I've also worked in a SCIF. I drove home from one everyday.
I don't see the danger. Give me an example.
No one can guarantee anyone gets a permit. No training organization no instructor. If a trainer is offering a service to guarantee the student a permit they are full of BS and should not be trusted for training.
TD
Dude, good on you for sticking up for yourself earlier in the thread but my BS meter is going off on this one.
It’s out there. It took my CSSO about 4, 5 week to get it. Mostly because it wasn’t sent thru normal official channels. Which is why I thought it was a hoax.
There is nothing I can do/say to make you believe it. I’ve seen it, and I still don’t believe it. Talk to your CSSO. Or... perhaps DONT talk to them and apply.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Does the kitchen business have clearance levels?
It’s out there. It took my CSSO about 4, 5 week to get it. Mostly because it wasn’t sent thru normal official channels. Which is why I thought it was a hoax.
There is nothing I can do/say to make you believe it. I’ve seen it, and I still don’t believe it. Talk to your CSSO. Or... perhaps DONT talk to them and apply.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Does the kitchen business have clearance levels?
I find it funny that someone like you, who has never held a clearance, chimes in on such issues. I mean the real issues about clearances.
Not the tiny violin playing exploiter issues.
Just like this guy who cannot give one solid reason why someone with a TS finds themselves in danger everyday.
No one has given proof how having a clearance puts them in danger.Not sure what my profession has to do with your question. You asked for an example I gave you one.
This is more than one thread where you have opined that people who have a TS clearance are in no danger from threats because they have a TS clearance. You have given no proof of this but have graced us with a portion of your career history which is frankly irrelevant to the discussion. Thank you for your service but that has ZERO to do with this discussion. It has become apparent that your opinion is that if the average Joe hasn't dealt with the situations that you have experienced in your career that they aren't worthy of a permit. Fortunately for them your opinion bears no weight on the decision making process.
Shall not be infringed, right? Or shall not be infringed IF you are current or former LEO? The Bill of Rights can be a bitch at times, eh?
No one has given proof how having a clearance puts them in danger.
Admin assistants in my office have TS clearances. They have no more assumed risk of danger. Flight attendants know TS info. Hell, they are in more danger than some everyday worker bee at NSA.
I've been in the admin side and operational side of having a TS. I've never seen danger and risk in the admin side.
I have real world experience.
So, just say clearance holders are using the system. Because I see beyond the smoke this "G&S" ******** they're trying to blow up people's asses.
So really your expertise here is how to beat the system. You really couldn't give a shit less on the actual reasons people need a permit.
But you'll say anyone who retorts anything contrary to your belief is anti 2A.
I'm all for shall issue. But it's hilarious to see people scramble behind ideas of how they can try to beat the Maryland system.
But yeah. Go ahead and "call me out" because I make a case.
No one has given proof how having a clearance puts them in danger.
Admin assistants in my office have TS clearances. They have no more assumed risk of danger. Flight attendants know TS info. Hell, they are in more danger than some everyday worker bee at NSA.
I've been in the admin side and operational side of having a TS. I've never seen danger and risk in the admin side.
I have real world experience.
So, just say clearance holders are using the system. Because I see beyond the smoke this "G&S" ******** they're trying to blow up people's asses.
So really your expertise here is how to beat the system. You really couldn't give a shit less on the actual reasons people need a permit.
But you'll say anyone who retorts anything contrary to your belief is anti 2A.
I'm all for shall issue. But it's hilarious to see people scramble behind ideas of how they can try to beat the Maryland system.
But yeah. Go ahead and "call me out" because I make a case.
As I have shared before, the Director of National Intelligence disagrees with your assessment of the risks. Now I don't know, but I believe he might be privy to a little more information than a retired leo.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...FjAAegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw1_VJcca4ksBbnBAEBRYOJS
Well, if you can get the DNI to document your personal threat status by name on signed letterhead, MDSP may entertain it. Most people on MDS do not have the sorts of connections needed to make that happen.
We definitely don't need to go that far. Hogan will probably remove the G&S requirement any decade now.