So you can’t have it on an A5 tube???
ATF moving to ban pistol braces (again)?
- Thread starter AssMan
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
So you can’t have it on an A5 tube???
WeaponsCollector
EXTREME GUN OWNER
Free pistol brace and bump stock disposal service! Just send these evil banned items to me and I will dispose of them free of charge.
Signed.
vgplayer
Ultimate Member
I think that might push it over the magically 13.5" LOP.
SB Tactical sells a LOP limiter https://www.sb-tactical.com/product/lopl-length-of-pull-limiter/
This also comes into play with Law Folders as well.
My apologies, my comment was merely speculation.
Without the language of a actual ruling, I believe SkiPatrolDude and vgPlayer may be on to something.
.
Is just one of the SB tactical "LOP Limiters" enough to correct the problem or are more needed?
1time
Ultimate Member
alucard0822
For great Justice
Wouldn't put it past the ATF to pull some shenanigans, but without details there isn't much point in speculating, seems more like a fundraising thing than a specific threat to braced "pistols".
Slowhand
Pre-Banned
The fact that nobody has mentioned the book "Unintended Consequences" still amazes me. This tome is amazing in its power to communicate what is being done to the community. And the message it could send regarding overstepping. This is a "slap my head" moment. But if you can't be bothered to read and learn, you get... what you get..
Merely meant to aggravate lurkers, not to ruffle technical feathers. I’ll take another mds break ... difficult to come across good news .
- Jul 29, 2014
- 49,992
Don't know if he achieved anything, which is good considering he was labeled to be the grim reaper when it came to our 2A rights, and as far as I know most of the biggest threats have and are coming from Republicans who are supposed to be the 2A saviors right? I'm quite happy he had no noteworthy accolades aren't you? Reagan, and both father and son Bush, have far long standing and greater achievements in there stellar terms.
To me it seems like a reasonable evolution would be for my “cashed check” to serve as my proof of their receipt of my paid tax. This is especially true for purchases made by individuals vs Trusts.
To be fair I think the reason they cash the check right away is to avoid problems from changing bank accounts or insufficient funds.
To be fair I think the reason they cash the check right away is to avoid problems from changing bank accounts or insufficient funds.
Obama never really went after the 2A, either. Almost completely neutral. More than we can say for Reagan and Trump.
Exactly my point!!! Which is crazy.
- Jul 29, 2014
- 49,992
Maybe he realized what going after guns would incur. Instead, letting the 'crazies' do the job for him. You can't deny it didn't almost work. Only have to look at the results of Sandy Hook and the scarcity of guns and ammo afterwards.
True...But again my point is Reagan, Bush SR, Bush JR, and now Trump admin, are all Republican and have outright went after our 2A, no cloak and dagger was necessary. It incurred nothing but people advocating how 2A they are.
- Nov 11, 2009
- 30,920
Obama's 2A achievements are mostly based in what he didn't do. He didn't get to ban firearms, though he would have if he thought it was possible. But the threat was enough.
One positive effect he had was flooding America with evil black rifles. Everyone was certain that he'd find a way to ban them, so they purchased enough of them to underscore their being "in common use." This will be helpful in the courts.
Another achievement was his "Fast and Furious" drug cartel gunrunning program. Evil on the face of it, and clearly designed as a tool to generate anti-2A sentiment and legislation, on exposure it blew up in his face, helping to cement the realisation that, yes, Virginia, we are coming for your guns.
Don't forget the way he poured gasoline onto the Zimmerman and Ferguson situations. More reasons to take up arms due to civil unrest. Many of the first-time gun buyers are on the Left of the spectrum, and bright enough to realise that they might inadvertently be harmed by the conditions their leaders foment.
Encouraging the media presence of race-baiters has also helped pro-2A sentiments, brought to fruition by the recent and continuing bouts of unrest. His administration was all about race-baiting, though it certainly didn't have to be. He could have been a huge force for civility. However, that's not what he is about.
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
Hair-trigger posting... please include more than just the "headline" (4 Viewers)- Started by Mr H
- Replies: 11
-
-
-
(Duplicate - mods please close) MoCo trans student arrested for threatening school- Started by Lafayette
- Replies: 2
-
