Who, if anyone, is The New "Colt" for AR's?

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • TheOriginalMexicanBob

    Ultimate Member
    Jul 2, 2017
    33,071
    Sun City West, AZ
    Fellas, I recertified my Colt armorers cert in August. They instructor was a senior Colt rep....he assured us that Colt isn't out of the civilian sale business, they simply are catching up on their government contracts for a few months....why are we believing a left leaning article spewing such nonsense? .....cause it's fun to panic buy, that's why.. ;)

    The original source of Colt suspending civilian rifle sales for a while was not a press release...Colt only sent notices to distributors and they leaked it. I think it was leaked likely to create a demand as they wanted to sell inventory that has been sitting due to slow sales. The Colt press release was after the fact...probably an effort to blunt criticism when it was simply a business decision to catch up with existing contracts. The press release was a bit too lawyerly and didn't help...they should have simply said it in plain language.
     

    Huckleberry

    No One of Consequence
    MDS Supporter
    Oct 19, 2007
    23,508
    Severn & Lewes
    Personally, I'm waiting for GM's Turbo Hydromatic Division to jump back into the market. They made a helluva good M16A1 for the DOD in addition to really great transmissions back in the day.

    J/K.....I shoot an Original Bushmaster Heat Dissipator so I go with a Windham.
     
    Last edited:

    Combloc

    Stop Negassing me!!!!!
    Nov 10, 2010
    7,249
    In a House
    Personally, I'm waiting for GM's Turbo Hydromatic Division to jump back into the market. They made a helluva good M16A1 for the DOD in addition to really great transmissions back in the day.


    I can tell you that the action on the one below is smoooooth. Probably slicker than any Colt I have shot. The lower is a repro but everything else is as it left the factory having come from the same almost new condition rifle; ex-police of all things. They were keeping the lower and "upgrading" it into a "more modern" carbine. I remember when you could buy these kits CHEAP. It's sad that we can't build stuff like this in this state anymore:
    P1180217_zpsczjbrql2.jpg


    P1180218Modified_zps1qgr7pht.png


    P1180219Modified_zpsodgzhbx5.png


    P1180238_zpsn2j7wphm.jpg


    P1180236_zpsdss28qpu.jpg


    P1180235_zpstyzugefy.jpg


    P1180234_zpsi72kgil7.jpg


    P1180232_zpsxtuqzmic.jpg


    P1180231_zpsemw3vcgp.jpg


    P1180230_zpsvlwhtl23.jpg


    P1180229_zpsjsctjoq3.jpg


    P1180227_zpssdqdp3c9.jpg


    P1180226_zpsddhwzqgv.jpg


    P1180225_zpsg5tp6bux.jpg


    P1180224_zpsbjee38qz.jpg
     
    Jun 4, 2015
    71
    I'm no snob, but S&W, Windham, several others mentioned, are...second tier at best. They're cheaper because they use cheaper materials. "Fit and finish" is fine, but durability matters, too. ESPECIALLY the buffer tube on the carbine. There's a 70% difference in strength between the actual milspec material AND PROCESS (impact extruded), and the ones that are merely milled to the right dimensions.

    It is possible to do better than milspec. Stoner and a couple of others exceed the standards by a margin.

    As far as stock ARs, here's a compiled chart of materials and processes from M4C:

    m4-chart-comparison%5B1%5D.jpg
     

    echo6mike

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 1, 2013
    1,794
    Close to DC
    I can tell you that the action on the one below is smoooooth. Probably slicker than any Colt I have shot. The lower is a repro but everything else is as it left the factory having come from the same almost new condition rifle; ex-police of all things. They were keeping the lower and "upgrading" it into a "more modern" carbine. I remember when you could buy these kits CHEAP. It's sad that we can't build stuff like this in this state anymore:

    Oh, man that looks great!

    And with the fun switch? Totes jelly.

    :party29:
     

    Sirex

    Powered by natural gas
    Oct 30, 2010
    10,442
    Westminster, MD
    I like my Colt a lot, but my Windham has been 100%. I know it is a consumer grade AR, but has nice build quality, and great warranty. I don't have the coin right now for a DD, BCM, Noveske. I think my Windham is a good compromise. If Skynet strikes, and I have to go into battle, I will take my Colt. To the range, the Windham.
     

    ralph.mclean

    GOC (Grumpy Old Cop)
    Jan 27, 2018
    236
    Edgewater, MD
    Windham Weaponry.

    Mine is their HBAR. (Maryland legal). Shoots great and is very well made, and cost less that the Colt by a couple hundred dollars. Very accurate, out to 300 yards anyway.

    Every bit as nice as my buddy's Colt.
     

    DutchV

    Ultimate Member
    Jul 8, 2012
    4,730
    The one Windham I saw in person had an un-staked castle nut. Not "poor staking" but none at all. Yes, I realize it's a sample of one. Still, that observation does not inspire confidence.
     

    TheOriginalMexicanBob

    Ultimate Member
    Jul 2, 2017
    33,071
    Sun City West, AZ
    Unfortunately...every manufacturer misses something every now and then...if it's a manmade item there will occasionally be a failure of quality control...no matter how hard they try or how good a company.

    When a LEO and agency instructor, we received a shipment of new Smith & Wesson revolvers. Another instructor and I took them all to the range to test fire all before they could be issued. All were fine but one...it wouldn't target at all...either missed the target or keyhole impacts. Upon inspection we found there was no rifling in the barrel...it was a smoothbore. When we returned to the office I called S&W...the fellow I spoke with said he wanted that revolver back to show people. He said it had to pass through the hands of at least a dozen workers and inspectors and no one caught it. We had the revolver back with a proper barrel on it in a week's turnaround.

    I think most will consider S&W a quality manufacturer. One mistake like that...while admittedly disconcerting...doesn't mean the entire product line is bad. I would think the same about Windham.

    Basically...it comes under the heading of sh!t happens. That's why you inspect and test any firearm that might be called upon to defend yourself with.
     

    erwos

    The Hebrew Hammer
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 25, 2009
    13,886
    Rockville, MD
    As far as stock ARs, here's a compiled chart of materials and processes from M4C:
    Not only is this chart old and not kept updated, it's been widely discredited as causing more problems than it solved. MPI never catches anything. HPT is murder on bolt lifespan. Recoil once did an interview with Reed Knight (who owns KAC), and he said that it HALVES the life on SR-25 bolts.

    It's 2019, the chart is not a thing anymore.

    FN is the new Colt. They have the M4 contract. It's pretty much that simple. Are there other companies that do as good a job, if not better? Absolutely. But if you want so-called mil-spec, FN is where to go if you don't want a Colt.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,556
    Messages
    7,286,253
    Members
    33,476
    Latest member
    Spb5205

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom