I said it before and I'll say it again. It's ridiculous to have to get the state involved in personal family business
+1
I said it before and I'll say it again. It's ridiculous to have to get the state involved in personal family business
And exactly when did he do that??????
I hope it was prior to October 1, 1996.
I have asked several sources and gotten many answers however the things that seem to be repeated are am immediate family member can take possession of firearms or parents without getting an outside agency involved.
TD
You will need your HQL for the handguns.
NO. Do yourself a favor and talk to a lawyer
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I spoke to a lawyer, MSP, and two FFl's
If any of you have different information and can cite the law please, I'd be happy to get a straight answer.
TD
Darn 2 is just too close to the 3 , isn't it?
Transfer from an estate is exempt from the HQL requirement.
But not from filing a 77r at no cost.
Correct, I was replying to Topher's incorrect comment about needing an HQL.
Thank for the added info PC.
Were they C&R (50 years old or more)?
Yes I did and used quicken willmaker. Only thing I have specified directly in my will is banned rifles. "Banned rifles as defined by Maryland law go to so and so", with an alternate person or two.
Everything else is letter of intent for the wifey to deal with. There is an envelope with suggestions and my desire that none of my collection be destroyed. You have things like standard capacity magazines and ghost guns to consider.