P320 X-Carry is still my next gun, most likely.
This^^^. The drops were all in line with the trigger pull. Inertia is a bitch...
Its not the weight of the trigger pull that they are talking about. Its the actual weight of the trigger, the heavier trigger carries more inertia hence setting the gun off. ...
Inertia is usually a property of not moving (or not being easily moved off a predetermined course). Do you guys mean momentum?
a property of matter by which it continues in its existing state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line, unless that state is changed by an external force.
Staying at the same velocity on the same path is also inertia.
Staying at the same velocity on the same path is also inertia.
The test that made the 320 fire was not the standard drop test. The test was more than required for the Army or California .
So they took a couple pistols after "torture testing" them, and found they would fire when thrown repeatedly in a way that nobody else tests? Seems like a lot of variables, even if there is something to their results. Probably a lot of other pistols that would "fail" whatever test criteria or lack thereof they are applying. Wonder if they are re-testing everything they sell and pulling them, being they sell Hi-point and Taurus, their standards must be lofty.
Ummm, the problem is when the gun fires...not fails to fire
So they took a couple pistols after "torture testing" them, and found they would fire when thrown repeatedly in a way that nobody else tests? Seems like a lot of variables, even if there is something to their results. Probably a lot of other pistols that would "fail" whatever test criteria or lack thereof they are applying. Wonder if they are re-testing everything they sell and pulling them, being they sell Hi-point and Taurus, their standards must be lofty.
Ummm, the problem is when the gun fires...not fails to fire
Stated in the video, all 3 pistols they tested for firing when dropped were previously "torture tested", probably stuffed full of mud, sand, etc, or generally beat on in an unrealistic way. The test pistols were possibly damaged before throwing them against the ground repeatedly till they were able to make them fire. So good chance whatever allows them to fire may be a part that was previously damaged, or seized, basically making their test worthless. In the slo-mo, the trigger doesn't bounce back far enough to simulate a full pull, but it did fire, so good chance a heavy trigger shoe isn't what is causing it to fire. This is part of the reason most other poly pistols use a paddle or hinged tab to lock the trigger out, although Sig does not.
There is a chance that the little bit of trigger movement pulls back far enough to disengage the striker block, and the force jars the sear off of the striker, releasing it, or any of those parts could have been damaged previously. I want to see an actual scientific test, several off the shelf pistols not previously beat on in prior testing, dropped from a reasonable height in a rig with sensors to repeat the test with other pistols, and determine the force required to instigate a failure. Then disassembly or high speed photos to find where the fault is, if there is a fault at all.
Hey Alucard,
Sorry guy....I wasn't trying to make a actual point. And I do understand the actual point you were trying to make. I was being a bit of a smarta-- as regards your comment wonder if they tried it with a Hi-point or Taurus...given those guns have reputations...deserved in some models....of not firing (failure to feed or fire or whatever).
But, your points are valid.
But I just realized some of the shots have the person standing right there, dropping the damned things onto concrete *with their bare hands* ... no protection, no evident barrier, no nothing (see, e.g. the video at 1:52). From the Omaha Outdoors video (not the kid in the garage), it's clearly not an automated/robotic test, which I would think to be the obvious method.
I find it *really* hard to believe that an actual firearms-safety tester would put him/herself in such danger. What's the chance the video clips are fake?
After market slide assembly. Not a Glock.
The test that made the 320 fire was not the standard drop test. The test was more than required for the Army or California .