S6T6
Member
- Dec 23, 2012
- 89
I get that if Ruger makes a .45 Auto and a 9mm on the same frame that the Roster Board may want balistics from both, but for a 1911 and a 1911CMD both .45 auto why does it matter. They are virtually identical so there should be no such need.
Also if MD doesn't want anyone to carry a specific variant then it shouldn't be allowed for any make. So why require each variant from every manufacturer be tested before approval? I mean what makes a Remington R1 1911 differ so greatly from a Reminton R1 1911 Enhanced to require each go thru testing and approval, or any 1911 style for that matter. Its not about the changes in the caliber or trigger it is about power & control PERIOD.
Also if MD doesn't want anyone to carry a specific variant then it shouldn't be allowed for any make. So why require each variant from every manufacturer be tested before approval? I mean what makes a Remington R1 1911 differ so greatly from a Reminton R1 1911 Enhanced to require each go thru testing and approval, or any 1911 style for that matter. Its not about the changes in the caliber or trigger it is about power & control PERIOD.