Go Back   Maryland Shooters > Gun Rights and Legislation > Maryland 2A Issues

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 10th, 2017, 04:18 PM #11
Hawkeye's Avatar
Hawkeye Hawkeye is offline
The Leatherstocking
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,904
Hawkeye Hawkeye is offline
The Leatherstocking
Hawkeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmyers View Post
I would be surprised.

Things change with the administration at the Handgun Licensing Section, but, going in public with valuable items has not usually been considered a substantial reason. If so, you could claim that guarding the expensive jewelry your wife wears is justification for a CCW. If you are a street corner marijuana dealer, well, that could make it legal for you to pack heat.

I believe that they are looking for proof that you carry cash, & they will want proof of large cash deposits in your bank. I don't ask dealers what percent of their payments are cash, & how much are check or charge. But, it's your $200, give it a try.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stoveman View Post
Please, if you don't know of which you speak don't pass it off here as fact. People are coming to get informed opinions on the possibility of getting a permit and this perpetuation of urban myth does not help.
What Stoveman said. Literally every single piece of advice in that post is wrong.
Hawkeye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2017, 06:14 PM #12
Magnumst's Avatar
Magnumst Magnumst is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 709
Magnumst Magnumst is offline
Member
Magnumst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldGunsGirls View Post
You are completely wrong. There is no requirement for cash deposits at all. Only deposits. Cash is irrelevant to a Wear and Carry application. Only that you own a business and can show a history of deposits proving that you are a business owner.
This is also incorrect. Banking is still in the MSP's SOP but is no longer a requirement although it may help but is no longer a requirement.
Magnumst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2017, 06:18 PM #13
campns's Avatar
campns campns is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 1,067
campns campns is offline
Senior Member
campns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 1,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by HankR View Post
If you always carry a gun that's owned by the business (in your bound book, if they're still actually called that) your restriction could read that the permit is only valid when you're carrying a gun 🙂
I know of atleast one FFL holder that their restrictions were written in a way that as long as they had their shop keys they could carry... well they kept their keys on their person and a glock at all times.
__________________
I represent displaced Pennsylvanians in this backward state, and yes I still cling to my guns and religion!
_______________________________________________

"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." --Abraham Lincoln

"Eating and sleeping are the only activities that should be allowed to interrupt a man's enjoyment of his cigar." - Mark Twain
campns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 11th, 2017, 06:41 AM #14
Gryphon's Avatar
Gryphon Gryphon is offline
inveniam viam aut faciam
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Baltimore County
Posts: 6,359
Gryphon Gryphon is offline
inveniam viam aut faciam
Gryphon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Baltimore County
Posts: 6,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stoveman View Post
Please, if you don't know of which you speak don't pass it off here as fact. People are coming to get informed opinions on the possibility of getting a permit and this perpetuation of urban myth does not help.
Exactly Stoveman. The OP will likely get a permit issued and have a very good chance of having any MSP derived restrictions removed via an appeal to the Board.
__________________
Patriot Picket, MSI, SAF, NRA Life, MDS, IDPA SO, NRA RSO, DPBF&G

“A citizen may not be required to offer a ‘good and substantial reason’ why he should be permitted to exercise his rights. The rights existence is all the reason he needs.” Judge Benson E. Legg

"A constitutional guarantee subject to [a] future judge's assessment of its usefulness is no constitutional guarantee at all." Dist. of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 634 (2008).
Gryphon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 11th, 2017, 09:19 AM #15
Schipperke's Avatar
Schipperke Schipperke is offline
Capt. Snarky
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Монтгомери
Posts: 12,408
Schipperke Schipperke is offline
Capt. Snarky
Schipperke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Монтгомери
Posts: 12,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldGunsGirls View Post
You are completely wrong. There is no requirement for cash deposits at all. Only deposits. Cash is irrelevant to a Wear and Carry application. Only that you own a business and can show a history of deposits proving that you are a business owner.
Then why did I and others I've spoken with get grilled on the interview about CASH deposits or handling of cash. The inference wasn't subtle that cash is an element.
Schipperke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 11th, 2017, 10:52 AM #16
zoostation's Avatar
zoostation zoostation is offline


 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Abingdon
Posts: 18,552
Images: 12
zoostation zoostation is offline


zoostation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Abingdon
Posts: 18,552
Images: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by HankR View Post
If you always carry a gun that's owned by the business (in your bound book, if they're still actually called that) your restriction could read that the permit is only valid when you're carrying a gun 🙂
Yep, I know an FFL who actually has that on his restrictions.
__________________
"I have been scientifically studying the traits and dispositions of the 'lower animals' (so-called), and contrasting them with the traits and dispositions of man. I find the result humiliating to me." -Mark Twain, 1896.
zoostation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 11th, 2017, 11:04 AM #17
Hawkeye's Avatar
Hawkeye Hawkeye is offline
The Leatherstocking
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,904
Hawkeye Hawkeye is offline
The Leatherstocking
Hawkeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,904
I think I'd actually be ok with a permit that said that my permit to carry a gun is only valid when I am carrying a gun.

Hawkeye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 11th, 2017, 12:30 PM #18
A1Uniform's Avatar
A1Uniform A1Uniform is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: 4010 Volta Ave, Second Floor, Brentwood, Maryland, 301-277-9100
Posts: 2,361
A1Uniform A1Uniform is offline
A1Uniform's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: 4010 Volta Ave, Second Floor, Brentwood, Maryland, 301-277-9100
Posts: 2,361
My business partner, who is not covered by LEOSA as I am had to get a MD permit. It was granted without any problem, but it is restricted to "To and from work and while doing business for the company," (or wording substantially like that.)
__________________
Class-3 Dealer/FFL
SOT Manufacturer, Class III/NFA Items
Maryland Regulated Firearms Dealer
Uniforms-Police Supply (Most Major Brands, Full-Line)
Propper and Armor Express Body Armor Dealer
H&K Distributor
Benelli L.E. Stocking Dealer
NRA
Izaak Walton League, Damascus, MD
A1Uniform is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 11th, 2017, 01:24 PM #19
boundlessdyad's Avatar
boundlessdyad boundlessdyad is offline
boundlessdyad
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: HoCo
Posts: 16,804
boundlessdyad boundlessdyad is offline
boundlessdyad
boundlessdyad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: HoCo
Posts: 16,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by A1Uniform View Post
My business partner, who is not covered by LEOSA as I am had to get a MD permit. It was granted without any problem, but it is restricted to "To and from work and while doing business for the company," (or wording substantially like that.)
He would easily be able to get it modified now. Modifications request cost $10.
boundlessdyad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 11th, 2017, 01:35 PM #20
A1Uniform's Avatar
A1Uniform A1Uniform is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: 4010 Volta Ave, Second Floor, Brentwood, Maryland, 301-277-9100
Posts: 2,361
A1Uniform A1Uniform is offline
A1Uniform's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: 4010 Volta Ave, Second Floor, Brentwood, Maryland, 301-277-9100
Posts: 2,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by boundlessdyad View Post
He would easily be able to get it modified now. Modifications request cost $10.
Disagree, he tried and failed.
__________________
Class-3 Dealer/FFL
SOT Manufacturer, Class III/NFA Items
Maryland Regulated Firearms Dealer
Uniforms-Police Supply (Most Major Brands, Full-Line)
Propper and Armor Express Body Armor Dealer
H&K Distributor
Benelli L.E. Stocking Dealer
NRA
Izaak Walton League, Damascus, MD
A1Uniform is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Home Page > Forum List > Gun Rights and Legislation > Maryland 2A Issues


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2017, Congregate Media, LP Privacy Policy Terms of Service