I agree the language cited previously is for those that live in states not requiring a permit. This looks as if any Non-Res permit a Marylander can acquire would be good to go here. As Delaware is (was?) the place to incorporate, I bet there will be a couple defacto states people will get permits from.
I agree as well. The "OR" part makes it clear this is giving a nod to the Constitutional Carry states. Otherwise it is the same as previous bills. A MD resident will be able to carry in any other state than MD with any permit.
I believe this is an attempt to satisfy the GOA, who pushed a bill with similar provisions regarding the Constitutional Carry states.
While this would be great I'm somewhat skeptical that someone from a Constitutional Carry state goes into NJ (with no permit) and doesn't get the book thrown at them and the courts upholding it. The reason I say so is the NY/NJ Port Authority cases where the courts said police from one state weren't expected to know the laws of another state. At least with a permit the cop doesn't need to know whether the person's home state is Con Carry or not.
This also could be part of a bargaining chip. They need 8 Dems in the Senate to go along, so maybe they can tell their caucus they "watered" it down by requiring a physical permit and it won't be an election time weapon in 2018.