Even on a 300blk?I seconded the 50 & 200 meter zero.
Even on a 300blk?
Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
Even on a 300blk?
Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
Ugh, I wish they had a class on zeroing and and the math behind all of this. I just use a calculator lol. I would love to learn these things in a deeper sense. I dont zero much at all cause optics are expensive but if I were stuck in an apocalyptic scenario I would probably need to know these in the field lol. I'm just another basic shooter lol.
Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
Easy to zero, and no math/calculator needed.
And can be done with less than 5 rounds.
Bore sight optic to bore.
Fire one round at 25 yard target. If you are happy that you did not pull it, continue.
Put rifle in rest of sandbags so that the optic is centered on the target (where you were aiming). Without moving the rifle, adjust the scope so that the optic is centered on the bullet hole. If you want to be fancy, for .223 with a 55 grain bullet, adjust the optic to be about 3/4 inch above the bullet hole.
Fire one round at 100 yard target, repeat above adjustment.
Done
3 round groups can be used, but if you are confident in your shooting ability, they do not add anything, especially at the 25 yard range
I only have access to a 25 yard and 50 yard range. I'm going to zero my sight based on some 300blk 124 grain hornady SST rounds. I guess figuring out the flattest zero based on the ranges of 1-50 with a ballistic calculator would be best. I like to zero with my potential HD or hunting ammo, I do not often have time to go to the range.Yes, that’s a great process in general to attain a zero, but what about the choice of what range to set his zero?
For all practical purposes, most shooters benefit from a zero where, give or take a few inches up or down, point of aim is point of impact.
Hence the 50/200 zero for a .223 recommendation. Point of aim should be good out to about 250 yds or so.
A 300 BO has a much less flat trajectory, and that’s where I think the ballistics calculator comes in handy. Not only in aiding the choice of what range to set your zero, but also in understanding what limitations it places on you.
And yes, an actual MOA is 1.047" at 100 yards. But many optics are set up for Shooter's MOA, which is 1.000" at 100 yards.
So either look up the specs for your optic, or test.
Or don't worry, as the difference is less than 1/2" at 1000 yards.
The choice of zero distance is a * Choice * . Different perspectives and philosophies. My take for my version of relative context emphasizes limiting the amount of spacing of poi being Above the poa at short to medium distances , even at expense of needing more apparent hold over at longer ranges. Other preferences, in other contexts will sacrifice defacto dead on aiming at medium-ish distances for absolute maximum distance to get hit somewhere on man sized target .
Greatly oversimplified rule of thumb- 1.5in high at ( certian distance ) .
For more or less modern high vel ctgs , 100yd .
For lower vel ctgs , 50yds ( also includes shotgun slugs , PCC, etc ).
I know seems oversimplified, but actually works pretty well. Main "weakness" is short changing the capabilies of really flat shooting ctgs .
Yes, that’s a great process in general to attain a zero, but what about the choice of what range to set his zero?
For all practical purposes, most shooters benefit from a zero where, give or take a few inches up or down, point of aim is point of impact.
Hence the 50/200 zero for a .223 recommendation. Point of aim should be good out to about 250 yds or so.
A 300 BO has a much less flat trajectory, and that’s where I think the ballistics calculator comes in handy. Not only in aiding the choice of what range to set your zero, but also in understanding what limitations it places on you.
RIP my head has explodedBiggfoot44, respectfully, I disagree. The whole point to MPBR is that you DON'T have to offset your aim and that POI and POA are within a set distance of your POA within distances of "what you would reasonably shoot). The idea being that +/- 3-5 inches will get you meat in the freezer provided you don't exceed ranges where the bullet drops below your acceptable variance from POA...and THEN you have to start offsetting. Or are you saying that 3-5 inches is beyond your comfort zone in terms of what's "close enough?"
Pinecone...I think we're actually in agreement. I think of 50/200 zero as a "typical" MPBR for a 55 gr .223 bullet, and where the POA = POA within a couple of inches. Your suggestion just ups the acceptable variance in POA/POI a few inches more in order to gain more yardage in range. Nothing wrong with that at all. In both cases, the goal of that zero is to minimize the consideration of bullet drop by the shooter and to be able to quickly place rounds onto target that will have "effect" out to a certain range before the shooter needs to start offsetting or adjusting his turrets. Perhaps semantics, and the 50/200 zero isn't really a MAXIMUM point blank range...but the concept is the same. Point, shoot, and expect the bullet to hit "close enough for business" to where you aimed within a set yardage. What constitutes "close enough" can be determined by the shooter's comfort level and goals.
How does one know what to set their zero at for a given bullet and velocity, within what that shooter wants to have as their acceptable trade off for variance in POA/POI and range? I know I'm preaching to choir for most here, but that's where the ballistic calculator comes in. Jump online and just plug in the bullet weight, the bullet's ballistic coefficient and velocity and you can experiment with different zero's and where that would put the round at what yardage vis a vie bullet drop. Confirm on the range. This is also an invaluable tool if you are shooting different bullet weights, especially if they vary a lot like switching up from super sonic 300 BLK to subsonic 300 BLK.
RIP my head has exploded
Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
RIP my head has exploded
Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk