Abramski v US cert petition ("straw purchase" for otherwise legal buyer)

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    pcfixer

    pcfixer

    Ultimate Member
    May 24, 2009
    5,954
    Marylandstan
    Brooklyn said:
    Can you explain how a right invented by the court has more protection than an explicit right? Or why enerated powers is a dead letter in the law? Or why is OK to disregard precedent when it conflicts with your agenda. I can.


    The claim that courts do not make policy is absurd on its face.. indeed that is exactly what case law is.

    The best predictor of the result of a controversial case is the effect on the social policy most favored by the majority of the court.

    This is why much court advocacy is truly ad hominem in the original meaning..

    Courts make policy today.. they always did. If logic were the guide there would be no need for diverisity on the court. Math and logic are not maters opinion.

    The court will give you a plessy if plessy is needed for the times.. it will give you a Roe if Roe is needed.. This is why the left lobies the court.

    Of course when the left has an issue with a 5-4 decision its honorable disent but when the right does its recatonary hate speech. No sale..

    The court is not now, and never has been, apolitical. Time to feel the heat Roberts court ... the peasants are not buying the act..
    Click to expand...


    100% spot ON. :thumbsup: 7 for 7 means great job in my book.
     
    GTOGUNNER

    GTOGUNNER

    IANAL, PATRIOT PICKET!!
    Patriot Picket
    Dec 16, 2010
    5,493
    Carroll County!
    The biggest problem with the supreme court is lack of laymen and 5 to 4 rulings. You have 1 person taking a decision. Imagine juries passing judgment with that type of decision. The system is screwed up. And guess who made it that way. A group of people that are generally only correct 50% of the time.

    Sent from my SM-T210R using Tapatalk
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
    Joe Bob Outfitters ad

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,580
    Messages
    7,287,140
    Members
    33,481
    Latest member
    navyfirefighter1981

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom