Go Back   Maryland Shooters > Gun Rights and Legislation > National 2A Issues
Don't Have An Account? Register Here

Join MD Shooters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 8th, 2019, 08:32 AM #51
Qbeam's Avatar
Qbeam Qbeam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,693
Qbeam Qbeam is offline
Senior Member
Qbeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,693
Yup, it takes two actions at the same time, not one. Doing two things at once is not their forte (walking and chewing gum).


Q
Qbeam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 8th, 2019, 12:46 PM #52
light12pdr's Avatar
light12pdr light12pdr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 128
light12pdr light12pdr is offline
Member
light12pdr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 128
From Judge Henderson
"Karen LeCraft Henderson, Circuit Judge,
dissenting : The appellants in this case make an extraordinary request: they want us to order briefing, hear argument and issue an opinion all within the next three weeks. An extraordinary request calls for an extraordinary showing. But the appellants fail to demonstrate, or even try to demonstrate,that their appeal clears the high bar for expedited consideration."

Doesn't the possibility of thousands of law abiding gun owners becoming felons overnight facing jail time and costly penalties match that "high bar" ? How about if people comply, destroy their property, and then the ban is lifted It would seem to me that the ban should be delayed until the Honorable Judge Henderson has had enough time.
light12pdr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 8th, 2019, 05:06 PM #53
pcfixer's Avatar
pcfixer pcfixer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Marylandstan
Posts: 4,552
pcfixer pcfixer is offline
Senior Member
pcfixer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Marylandstan
Posts: 4,552
Quote:
Originally Posted by light12pdr View Post
From Judge Henderson
"Karen LeCraft Henderson, Circuit Judge,
dissenting : The appellants in this case make an extraordinary request: they want us to order briefing, hear argument and issue an opinion all within the next three weeks. An extraordinary request calls for an extraordinary showing. But the appellants fail to demonstrate, or even try to demonstrate,that their appeal clears the high bar for expedited consideration."

Doesn't the possibility of thousands of law abiding gun owners becoming felons overnight facing jail time and costly penalties match that "high bar" ? How about if people comply, destroy their property, and then the ban is lifted It would seem to me that the ban should be delayed until the Honorable Judge Henderson has had enough time.
Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina
Nominated by Ronald Reagan on June 3, 1986, to a seat vacated by William W. Wilkins.
__________________
Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of tyrannical government.

“By the way I call it "moral obedience" rather than "civil disobedience" because it is God's law". Those who try to promote un-natural laws on us are committing moral disobedience. It is our duty to resist immoral laws and actions.” By Richard Fry.
pcfixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 8th, 2019, 05:55 PM #54
ironpony's Avatar
ironpony ironpony is offline
@therange
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Crofton/Davidsonville
Posts: 5,235
ironpony ironpony is offline
@therange
ironpony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Crofton/Davidsonville
Posts: 5,235
BREAKING: Federal Lawsuit Filed Challenging Trump Bump-Stock Ban; Injunction Sought

She’s correct, a bill against a right should NOT be made law until ALL cases against it are ruled upon by the judicial branch of government. Otherwise it is guilty until proven innocent by said branch. Postpone that shit. Or do your job.

Just a thought.
__________________
ICBW
ironpony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 11th, 2019, 04:52 PM #55
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,247
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,247
brief filed in support of us today

https://www.scribd.com/document/4016...ci-Chemerinsky
__________________
“We are twice armed if we fight with faith.”

― Plato
wolfwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 11th, 2019, 05:33 PM #56
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,247
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,247
https://www.scribd.com/document/4016...k-Amicus-Brief

https://www.scribd.com/document/4016...k-Amicus-Brief

https://www.scribd.com/document/4016...r-Respondsbile

more briefs in support
__________________
“We are twice armed if we fight with faith.”

― Plato
wolfwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 12th, 2019, 06:59 PM #57
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,247
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,247
https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-insp...2019-04799.pdf

Bob Barr just ratified the rule so the appointments clause arugment is out
__________________
“We are twice armed if we fight with faith.”

― Plato
wolfwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 12th, 2019, 07:15 PM #58
RepublicOfFranklin's Avatar
RepublicOfFranklin RepublicOfFranklin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: The ‘Dena - DPRM
Posts: 973
RepublicOfFranklin RepublicOfFranklin is offline
Member
RepublicOfFranklin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: The ‘Dena - DPRM
Posts: 973
Bob Barr was, is, and will always be a traitor to the Constitutional oath he swore.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RepublicOfFranklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 12th, 2019, 08:22 PM #59
PowPow's Avatar
PowPow PowPow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Howard County
Posts: 2,354
PowPow PowPow is offline
Senior Member
PowPow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Howard County
Posts: 2,354
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfwood View Post
https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-insp...2019-04799.pdf

Bob Barr just ratified the rule so the appointments clause arugment is out
That was a procedural way to nix it fast, but obvious more fertile grounds await!
__________________
SAF Patron (Life) | GOA (Life) | CCRKBA (Life) | NRA Benefactor (Life) | MSRPA (Life)
MSI (Executive) | Maryland Designated Collector | Utah CCW

#WeWillNotComply
PowPow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 13th, 2019, 04:07 PM #60
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,247
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,247
brief by the government and one by giffords in support. Now we start writing our reply

https://www.scribd.com/document/4018...k-Amicus-Brief

https://www.scribd.com/document/4018...Appellee-Brief
__________________
“We are twice armed if we fight with faith.”

― Plato
wolfwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Home Page > Forum List > Gun Rights and Legislation > National 2A Issues


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2019, Congregate Media, LP Privacy Policy Terms of Service