Are they sold as parts kits?
X-tended Mags on Ebay
- Thread starter Woody Green
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Are they sold as parts kits?
Its not manufacturing if you are simply replaceing parts...
They are on there one example
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Three-New-...547916&hash=item284d64fff8:g:MzAAAOSwM~taWlDX
At least the seller says:
"I cannot ship these magazines to the following states and cities: California, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Washington DC, Aurora, IL, Chicago, IL. DO NOT ORDER THIS PRODUCT, if you live in these locations."
"I cannot ship these magazines to the following states and cities: California, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Washington DC, Aurora, IL, Chicago, IL. DO NOT ORDER THIS PRODUCT, if you live in these locations."
- May 22, 2005
- 122,889
I don't have that problem.
BUFF7MM
☠Buff➐㎣☠
Attachments
This is the first thing I thought when I saw the first post. The Bloomberg and Soros groups are trying to stir up trouble on all gun related forums, not just MDS, and they've been very successful on the California websites.
- Feb 19, 2013
- 18,767
Watched you when I was a boy. Too bad about your knee problems.
Yep, I've never noted mags over 10. Ebay is funky though. I just sold an AR-15 22lr conversion bolt. My first listing they pulled because I had a photo of the package and it reads AR-15. I pulled the bolt for photos, then just listed it as 22lr Conversion, and that listing stayed. Got a great price too.
Thanks for taking him out (gender assumption alert). This may be more of a rhetorical question, but what's the point? What are they trying to accomplish, just stirring the pot? Sheesh, get a life, learn something, life is too short.
I would also like to point out.....I was right at post #5. 
I believe that the end game is to get someone here to suggest something illegal and then they can pound that into the ground during testimony that the gun community in MD is constantly offering advice for how to break MD Law, so we need tighter laws. That's my guess anyway.
I am glad to be a part of a forum that NEVER advocates for or advises upon breaking the law.
I believe that the end game is to get someone here to suggest something illegal and then they can pound that into the ground during testimony that the gun community in MD is constantly offering advice for how to break MD Law, so we need tighter laws. That's my guess anyway.
I am glad to be a part of a forum that NEVER advocates for or advises upon breaking the law.
Thanks for the insight. These people are just pathetic.
MindTheGAP
Active Member
Hear hear! Quite the opposite actually; from perusing the various subtopics here, you guys are as well versed (lets be honest - better versed) in gun law than virtually ever MS-based police officer I've ever met or heard of, and certainly more knowledgeable than those deciding the laws around firearms.I believe that the end game is to get someone here to suggest something illegal and then they can pound that into the ground during testimony that the gun community in MD is constantly offering advice for how to break MD Law, so we need tighter laws. That's my guess anyway.
I am glad to be a part of a forum that NEVER advocates for or advises upon breaking the law.
I believe that the end game is to get someone here to suggest something illegal and then they can pound that into the ground during testimony that the gun community in MD is constantly offering advice for how to break MD Law, so we need tighter laws. That's my guess anyway.
I am glad to be a part of a forum that NEVER advocates for or advises upon breaking the law.
It has been proven they do not need facts to back up their lies. Wasn't there a lot of BS during testimony yesterday? and obama was born in hawaii ...
Ranchero50
Ultimate Member
I believe that the end game is to get someone here to suggest something illegal and then they can pound that into the ground during testimony that the gun community in MD is constantly offering advice for how to break MD Law, so we need tighter laws. That's my guess anyway.
I am glad to be a part of a forum that NEVER advocates for or advises upon breaking the law.
The irony is just like the restrictive gun purchasing laws (HQL, CCW) that only those with limited means / transport can't have the means to defend themselves.
That didn't take long. See post #5.
Why thank you Sir!
What they hope to accomplish is to spread misinformation to spread uncertainty and doubt about gun laws and practices, making it easier for them to pass anti-gun laws after they divide gun owners. Not all gun owners are like MDS members who actually shoot and know the laws, so the Bloomberg groups take advantage of this and convince some gun owners that "reasonable" gun laws are a good thing, or that the gun banners aren't really out to ban all guns, or turn one group of gun owners against other groups of gun owners. I've seen how successful they have been in California, and they are trying to do it in all states.
