I ordered from Battlehawk also and it did say all sales were final. Also there is a 10% cancellation fee if you cancel.
$375.44 shipped is a pretty damned good price that I feel like I'd be kicking myself for not buying a few years down the line. Decided on just one for now.
Found a friend of a friend with an FFL with a $40 transfer fee.
I ordered from Battlehawk also and it did say all sales were final. Also there is a 10% cancellation fee if you cancel.
$375.44 shipped is a pretty damned good price that I feel like I'd be kicking myself for not buying a few years down the line. Decided on just one for now.
Found a friend of a friend with an FFL with a $40 transfer fee.
I didn’t go with a collapsible stock, just a mesa tactical urbino stock to reduce length of pull to allow for a more modern shooting stance. But to speak to your question in a general sense, I’m putting the same parts on my S4 that I would put on a Benelli M4. It gives me a good quality tactical shotgun with the features I want for $1000-$15000 less than I would pay for a Benelli M4.
The factory stock is way, way too long. Just like on a real Benelli M4. If you run your guns closer to centerline than shoulder pocket (which is the way I was taught), shorter is better. It also gives you a 922r part and probably a better recoil pad. This thing where you buy a cheap gun and then invest zero dollars in it is foolish. I'm still saving $1200 over a real Benelli M4, which I would have done the same thing to.
Nah, I do it all the time. I've got a Razor Gen3 on a gun that cost way under $2000, and a $2500 scope on my $1200 Ruger Precision Rifle. Gun needs to do a job. It gets the equipment to do it.
since we are using made up numbers: What if you end up with exactly what you want for $25,000 instead of paying $70,000 for something that you still have to dump $15k worth of parts in to get what you want? Do you leave all firearms stock, or only buy firearms that do exactly what you want out of the box with zero customization?
