So, does the bump stock ban give binary trigger owners ground to now stand on? The ATF said they didn't have legal the authority to grant approval to MD bumpstock or binary trigger owners. Now that they are regulating bumpstocks, but not binary triggers is there new langauge we should try on our letters for binary triggers?
Trump himself is no friend of the 2nd Amendment.
Sorry, but he's -1 right now. And we still don't know how Gorsuch and Kavanaugh would rule, so he might be -3 or +1.He’s the most pro-2A President ever
Everybody knows it.
Other Presidents?
Total 2A disasters. Believe me.
Yes.
Yes, they are.
Yes. It came directly from Trump's mouth. Among his other anti-gun comments and actions (take the guns first, due process later, etc) was that he directed ATF to come up with a way to regulatorily ban bump stocks after the Vegas shooting.
No grain of salt needed - that article is factually correct. Things went down pretty much exactly like it says there. They couldn't pass a law to do it, the Vegas shooting happened, and Trump immediately ordered ATF to find a way to ban them, and told the NRA that "bump stocks are gone."
He is certainly not. He made the pro-2A noises during his campaign to grab votes, but he has no track record of ever being pro-2A before that, and has no track record of being pro-2A since he was elected. Remember, this is the guy who said "take the guns first, and due process later.... I like taking the guns early."
Yup. The guy is not our friend.
Heck, one of Trump's campaign promises was that he would undo Obama's ATF Rule 41f/p as soon as he took office. Here we are nearly 2 years after the date he took office and Rule 41f/p is still the law. I posted about this in the "Thoughts on Trump" page, but I understand if it was missed because I rarely ever go to that monstrosity anymore.
Sorry, but he's -1 right now. And we still don't know how Gorsuch and Kavanaugh would rule, so he might be -3 or +1.
And we haven't heard anything about the Hearing Protection Act. There was "supposed" to be a vote before year-end (yeah, right). Why isn't Trump pushing that?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Just finished reading it. It should be a slam dunk to get this rolling again. IANAL The Horne part of the argument seems undeniable.
How did this law deny people the right to dispose of (sell where legal) or move the personal property out of state before it went in effect? There was an opportunity to mitigate loss, but some cases cited not so much so that oppurtunity, and you can be sure to read that is in the response. These cites are in other 2A cases, argued in other states. Maybe wait for the response before seeing a "slam dunk".
Just finished reading it. It should be a slam dunk to get this rolling again. IANAL The Horne part of the argument seems undeniable.
How did this law deny people the right to dispose of (sell where legal) or move the personal property out of state before it went in effect? There was an opportunity to mitigate loss, but some cases cited not so much so that oppurtunity, and you can be sure to read that is in the response. These cites are in other 2A cases, argued in other states. Maybe wait for the response before seeing a "slam dunk".
“Flatlander Laws”....can I use this, too? Funny!
A well written appeal. How is the legal fund looking? Tax refund season is here and I might be able to kick in another donation.