Gun Owners of Maryland: BEWARE!

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • DC-W

    Ultimate Member
    Patriot Picket
    Jan 23, 2013
    25,290
    ️‍
    Email is Ok

    Apologies for any confusion



    Today, United States District Court Judge James K. Bredar denied Maryland Shall Issue's motion for temporary relief against the State’s ban on possession of “Rapid Fire Trigger Activators” by SB 707, signed into law by the Governor on April 24, 2018. This means the law will go into effect as passed on October 1st, 2018. That's just two weeks from now. HOWEVER, while the case is pending, the judge made it clear that he believes all that’s needed to comply with the law is for the existing owner to send a letter applying for authorization to possess the "devices" covered by SB 707 to the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) by 10/01/2018. That is the "grandfather" clause contained in SB 707 and that was the clause that the judge seized upon in holding that MSI had failed to show the "irreparable injury" necessary for preliminary relief. As he said at the hearing, all you have to do is "apply" to the ATF by October 1 for "authorization to possess" the "device" in order to avoid prosecution for a year. And to the judge, it simply did not matter that the ATF has refused to receive or process any such request for "authorization" because the statute merely required the owner to "apply," not for the ATF to actually accept the application.

    But, here is the rub: The law is so vague that no one knows what it covers. Every gun owner in the state may possess "Rapid Fire Trigger Activator(s), and not even know it. Such "device" includes binary trigger systems, bump stocks, burst trigger systems, a Hellfire Trigger, a trigger crank, or a burst trigger system and copies thereof. But the banned items ALSO includes any "device, including a removable manual or power-driven activating device, constructed so that, when installed in or attached to a firearm: (I) the rate at which the trigger is activated increases; or (II) the rate of fire increases.” Yet, virtually anything you do to your firearm may "increase" the "rate of fire" by some minute amount, including cleaning it. There is no definition for a "device" and the statute includes ALL firearms, not merely semi-automatics. At the hearing, Judge Bredar remarked on the extreme vagueness of the State’s law as he demonstrated how GUN OIL being used to lubricate A BOLT-ACTION RIFLE to "increase" the "rate of fire" of the rifle because the action could be worked more efficiently, meaning the trigger could be manually activated faster than it could before using the GUN OIL. The judge thus warned the State that he had real problems with how vague the statute was. In short, we don't know what is covered by this language covering a "device" that increases the "rate of fire" and neither does the State, the judge or anyone else. The potential for arbitrary enforcement is quite real.

    And that is a BIG problem. A conviction for the mere possession of a SB 707 "device" (whatever it means) will result in the loss of your Second Amendment rights for life. It doesn't have to be a bump stock or the other listed devices to be covered. And even you aren't convicted, you could still be arrested and jailed for such possession by an overzealous law enforcement officer. It doesn't matter when or where you bought it or whether it is installed or whether it has ever been used. It doesn't have to be a device for a semi-automatic firearm. Mere possession in Maryland is enough. Under the judge's ruling today, the only way any gun owner in this State can protect themselves from potential arbitrary arrest and/or prosecution under this law (SB 707) is to send in the attached letter to the ATF.

    All you have to do is print off this form, fill in the blanks and send it in to the ATF at the address indicated. To be safe, the ideal way to send it is via US Mail, return receipt requested. But by all means, send it any way you can (and keep a copy). Regardless how you send it, it must be sent before OCTOBER 1, 2018. Sending this letter does NOT mean that you are identifying yourself as owning a bump stock or any specific device. It just means that you (like we) don't know what is covered by the SB 707 ban on a "device" that "increases" the "rate of fire." The letter merely repeats the language set out in grandfather clause of SB 707. And note, even if you apply for "authorization" with the ATF, the prohibition imposed on possession by SB 707 kicks back in on October 1, 2019, if "authorization" is not actually received by that time. We already know that the ATF will not actually entertain such "applications" because it has publicly announced that it would not consider them. But that does not and will not matter until October 1, 2019. In the meantime, all you have to do is "apply" under the judge's ruling.

    The case is not over by any means. All the judge did was deny preliminary relief. He did not address the merits in his ruling (other than to warn the State that they had a problem on how vague the statute was). We are encouraged by some the judge's remarks made at the hearing. Maryland Shall Issue will continue the fight but in the meantime, it is absolutely essential that you send this letter to the ATF as soon as possible. Legally, it is the only way you can protect yourself from this vague statute under the judge's ruling today. Hopefully, the case will be over by October 1, 2019 (at least in district court), so we will know more before then.

    -----

    This link goes right to the entire writeup and can be passed easily along to others. Please do so.

    tinyurl.com/sb707

    The address the application needs to be sent to is:

    The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
    99 New York Avenue NE
    Washington, DC 20226

    This is as given from the ATF.

    If you choose to email the completed application, the address is: FIPB@atf.gov

    -----
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Q. Should I have my signature notarized?
    A. No. Proving your identity and having your signature witnessed by a notary is completely unnecessary.

    Q. Can I email the completed form?
    A. No. The form should be sent via independent, trackable carrier. Recommended options include United States Postal Service Certified Mail, United Parcel Service or FedEx. Email is not recommended.

    Q. Isn’t this the wrong zip code for the ATF?
    A. No. Please send your completed form to the mailing address indicated on the form.

    Q. Can I alter the form to include methods, etc.
    A. No. Multiple knowledgeable attorneys collaborated on the exact wording of each part of the form. It is not advised you alter any part of the text in any way.

    Q. Can you fill in and submit the form for me.
    A. No.

    Q. Why mail the form if the ATF already said that they will not receive or act on my application?
    A. Maryland law only requires that you apply to the ATF to be protected during the interim period, until October 1, 2019. Maryland law does not require the ATF to accept or even acknowledge your application.

    Q. Who would consider gun oil (or anything else) unlawful to possess under Maryland law?
    A. A Federal Judge has already concluded that gun oil could be construed as unlawful to possess under the current definition of the law.

    -----
    Media Coverage
    Ammoland: https://www.ammoland.com/2018/09/maryland-gun-owners-out-to-dry-gun-oil-ban/#axzz5RMP3ZFnR

    The Truth About Guns: https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2...goes-into-effect-oct-1-heres-what-you-can-do/

    The Daily Record (Requires Subscription): https://thedailyrecord.com/2018/09/14/maryland-bump-stock-ban-federal-court-challenge/
     

    K3LAG

    Active Member
    According to tracking information my letter was delivered to the ATF on the morning of 25 September but my return receipt is still shown as being in Pre-Shipment status and there is no tracking information for it. Maybe I'll get the receipt some day. Maybe not. :shrug:
     

    DC-W

    Ultimate Member
    Patriot Picket
    Jan 23, 2013
    25,290
    ️‍
    According to tracking information my letter was delivered to the ATF on the morning of 25 September but my return receipt is still shown as being in Pre-Shipment status and there is no tracking information for it. Maybe I'll get the receipt some day. Maybe not. :shrug:

    Maintain the records you have.
     

    TexDefender

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 28, 2017
    1,572
    My question is how many requests were received by AFT? I think that is important to know.

    Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
     
    Last edited:

    pilot25

    Ultimate Member
    Jul 13, 2016
    1,822
    According to tracking information my letter was delivered to the ATF on the morning of 25 September but my return receipt is still shown as being in Pre-Shipment status and there is no tracking information for it. Maybe I'll get the receipt some day. Maybe not. :shrug:

    I have the exact same issue. I sent certified mail with return receipt. Return shows pre-shipment. Pretty sure you have to sign the acceptance then the other portion the mail man takes. Guess they are keeping both portions.
     

    Falkus

    Dating Scarlett Johansson
    Feb 26, 2007
    2,037
    Undisclosed location
    Just got my Email and Certification letter to the ATF which showed being delivered.

    When I sent myself a copy, My wife asked me if I wanted to have that mail open. I yanked it out of her hands.

    Her respond was: "I guess that is a BIG FAT NO"
     

    WeaponsCollector

    EXTREME GUN OWNER
    Mar 30, 2009
    12,120
    Southern MD
    Please let me know when the state starts sending out teams of Jackboots asking if we have any “Rapid Fire Trigger Activators” and demanding to see any and all records we may have for our “Rapid Fire Trigger Activators" whatever the F*** “Rapid Fire Trigger Activators” are. :shrug:
     

    blkrex

    Member
    Mar 11, 2013
    24
    So i received my reply letter from the ATF today. My original letter was stamped "return without action". It came with a second letter that basically states that the ATF does not have the legal authority to weigh in on this. So now what?
     

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,466
    Westminster USA
    Nothing. You have complied with the MD statute according to the Federal Judge in the MSI lawsuit

    Isn’t it great?
     
    Last edited:

    whistlersmother

    Peace through strength
    Jan 29, 2013
    8,963
    Fulton, MD
    So i received my reply letter from the ATF today. My original letter was stamped "return without action". It came with a second letter that basically states that the ATF does not have the legal authority to weigh in on this. So now what?
    You're good until Oct 2019. Squirrel away the original stamped letter and certified receipt. Nothing else needs to be done for the year.

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
     

    MEGARMS

    KnowNothing
    Jun 3, 2012
    3,843
    Carroll County
    So i received my reply letter from the ATF today. My original letter was stamped "return without action". It came with a second letter that basically states that the ATF does not have the legal authority to weigh in on this. So now what?

    Received mine as well. Never did get my return receipt though. This is stupid.
     

    whistlersmother

    Peace through strength
    Jan 29, 2013
    8,963
    Fulton, MD
    If you got the original letter back and kept the initial certified receipt, you won't need the green signature card, although would be nice to have that also.

    The original returned letter is proof someone at ATF received it.

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
     

    MEGARMS

    KnowNothing
    Jun 3, 2012
    3,843
    Carroll County
    If you got the original letter back and kept the initial certified receipt, you won't need the green signature card, although would be nice to have that also.

    The original returned letter is proof someone at ATF received it.

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

    I agree, however it makes one wonder. Where is the receipt that I paid $2.75 for?
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,426
    Messages
    7,281,256
    Members
    33,452
    Latest member
    J_Gunslinger

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom