It cannot be.
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
It cannot be.
MkVsTheWorld
Member
- May 29, 2014
- 4
This is total crap. There is also no way to legitimize legally completed products either, even if you can legally buy handguns either. I really hope this bill keeps failing.
Side note, since the bill text says "Person", this could potentially be bypassed with the ownership of a completed gun being a shell company. You could argue it was built by the shell company and your possession is due to you being the sole employee and thus not a "Person" the law applied to.
Side note, since the bill text says "Person", this could potentially be bypassed with the ownership of a completed gun being a shell company. You could argue it was built by the shell company and your possession is due to you being the sole employee and thus not a "Person" the law applied to.
That would be a crime. You, a person, May manufacture a firearm for your personal use. You may sell it later if that was not your intention when it was built. The shell company manufacturing it could not build it for you, or else they’d need an manufacturers FFL. Nor could the company build it for themselves with you being the sole employee.
MkVsTheWorld
Member
- May 29, 2014
- 4
But, you don't need an FFL if the gun isn't changing ownership.
Do more than hope. Join the fight. Contact your reps. Come to Annapolis and testify if you can. Tell all of your friends, relatives, and acquaintances. Get them into the fight as well.
Look at ATF regulations. A person may build a firearm for personal use without an FFL. A company cannot. A company requires a manufacturers FFL if they are to construct firearms either for sale or for any other reason.
So you wearing your hat as the company could not legally build a gun unless you had the appropriate FFL. You as an individual could build said gun, but you could not then transfer it in to possession of the company (well you could if that hadn’t been your intent when you built the gun, but that’s a pretty thin veil to hide behind).
Don’t forget that a big part of our system of government is State’s Rights. There is nothing in the Federal law you cite that makes it illegal for a State to impose further restrictions on the making of firearms for personal use.
I have decided that when I finish my first build, I will serialize it.
FU-MGA-01
What do you think? I like it.
FU-MGA-01
What do you think? I like it.
pcfixer
Ultimate Member
NOT!
I figured the sarcasm was implied.
I don't see any reason not to serialize my 80% builds. I do, just in case they are stolen. A serial number never registered is useless.
PowPow
Where's the beef?
Hearings for these bills are coming up:
HB910 House Judiciary Wed. 2/26 1pm
SB958 Judicial Proceedings Tue 3/3 at 12:00 p.m.
HB910 House Judiciary Wed. 2/26 1pm
SB958 Judicial Proceedings Tue 3/3 at 12:00 p.m.
letmeoutpax
Active Member
Anybody going tomorrow?
hodgepodge
Senior Member (Gold)
Yes, to testify against this and HB1257 (Eliminate Gun Dealers Act).
This one bans guns that are not a problem. But the worst part is its censorship of speech.
PowPow
Where's the beef?
Sign-up between 9am-12noon outside the hearing room. The link to the policy is in the OP, but here it is for convenience. I'll be there tomorrow.
Nickberg500
Ultimate Member
Can we setup a registry of people who can't make it and have them entered as opposed to the bill? Maybe not posted online for all to see, but maintained by someone trusted? I can only make the Senate Bill version of this.
Sent from my SM-G950U1 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G950U1 using Tapatalk
Except common sense and that pesky Internet thingy. And then there's technological advancement in general.
But we ARE talking about Maryland, where you HAVE TO DO SOMETHING FO' THE CHILLUNS...
ziptiespec
Active Member
Del. Arikan offered to help enter written testimony into the system for anyone that could not appear in person.
From an email from MSI.
The below is a message from Delegate Lauren Arikan:
What can YOU do?
1) Submit WRITTEN TESTIMONY to the committee about why this legislation is wrong or how it will impact your life.
Include the following info. in your email:
A. Name
B. Address (so the delegates know if you are their constituent)
C. Email Address
D. The Bill #’s and OPPOSE ( You can send one email with all of the bills #’s on it)
E. Send to Lauren.Arikan@house.state.md.us (or reply to this email)
F. You can also submit it to the committee on the day of the hearing but it will need to be a PDF file on a flash drive.
2) Come to Annapolis to give VERBAL TESTIMONY to the committee.
A. Get to Annapolis between 9am-11:00am on the day of the hearing to sign up to speak.
B. Prepare a 90 second testimony of what you would like to say to the committee. Remember, be polite!
C. If you don’t want to speak you can sign up and simply say “me too” when it’s your turn.
Or DO BOTH!
We need verbal testimony on several days – please come if you can or at least submit written testimony.
Last edited:
I will be there
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
-
-
‘Why is nothing being done?’: Concerns grow about drug use, fighting in Montgomery Co. school bathrooms (1 Viewer)
- Started by RFBfromDE
- Replies: 10
-
-
