So Zirkin believes that you should lose your ability to own firearms if you are convicted of seriously annoyingly another person? Am I reading this correctly?
SB0123
http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/webmga/frmMain.aspx?pid=billpage&tab=subject3&id=sb0123&stab=01&ys=2018RS
I didn't even know that this was a law.
§3–803
http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/webmga/f...on=3-803&ext=html&session=2017RS&tab=subject5
I have to ask, why? I mean, I get it, to disarm us. But it’s a maximum of 90 days. That is about as low as you can go in Maryland and still have prison as a possible result. And there you’d probably need to be doing something REAL bad to get it, have a bunch of priors or it’s your 4th time in front of the judge for it.
Screw Zirkin. Only violent offenses (I’d consider domestic abuse violent) should ever result in losing your right to bear arms. Harassment isn’t violent and if it is, it is assault or battery, not harassment.