- Aug 29, 2016
- 763
I'm calling ******** and am quoting your exact words earlier in the thread.
Ignorant extremist statement.
NYC is showing you an urban environment where people do not have mental issues, but act in the manner that they were raised. Because they are not your "high standards" for society, you are acting out.
Direct contradiction in the post quoted below.
Back to the extreme again.
You might want to read federal law on your assumption, because you are factually incorrect.
And you are extreme, yet again. If the person is medicated or is able to manage themselves in a manner that poses no danger to the public, then there is no reason why they should not be able to exercise the right.
Here comes the extremist nature and ignorance again, without any factual information to back up your assumptions and statements.
So now you are attempting a half assed backpedal on what you have previously stated. Really classy.
Want to keep spouting the BS? Go right ahead, but members know you are full of it and are seeing right through you to your extremist ways.
Nothing I said contradicts anything else. You're arguing that mentally ill is a broad enough category that they shouldn't all be locked up. I agree with that. I'm referring to the paranoid schizophrenic and severely bipolar. It used to be much easier for the government to institutionalize these people (often with the help of their families). Now it's almost impossible. The people running down the street screaming are probably schizophrenic, but have never been diagnosed or continue to roam the streets because we have an inadequate mental health system. Your solution is to do nothing about these people.