What they are doing is illegal. They are in violation of the terms of their "medical" cannabis cards.
Certainly in violation of number 4, and likely violating one, two, and three as well.
These guys are breaking the law, and they are subject to arrest. Number one on this list looks like it's illegal to even sit in the driver's seat of a parked vehicle while under the influence. That's how I read it, anyway.
They are required to sign this legal document when they buy their "medical" weed:
I'd like to see a logical argument against this post^^^^. If one does exist, I can't reason it up.
I am getting fed up with this shit
I have three decent size jobs going, 2-5 million each, with different subs on each job and different guys bouncing back and forth and it seems that around 20-25% of these **** ups are burning weed on my time
I am gonna say another 5-10% are pillheads
And right now out of around 100 men I don’t believe I have any drinking on my time or even coming in hung over.
Very different from when I was young and it was 50% drunks and 10% potheads but at least back then we had the decency to hide it
And I asked a bunch of guys who sub from us after lunch and over half of the guys I asked have weed cards, some I wouldn’t have guessed , I guess half the people would rather have weed than their rights
Good pointIt is the 9 vs .40 vs .45 argument. Nobody is going to give an inch and nobody is going to let the other guy win.
I'll never believe that burning plant matter and inhaling the smoke is "good" for you. But, doing it once or twice a day vs 20-40 (two to three packs of cigarettes) a day and being physically addicted to the point you are completely aware it's killing you....... and you still continue the use???????
My grandmother died of Emphysema and other lung related disorders. She smoked from the age of around 13 until her late 60's, died at 77 years old but had a REALLY miserable last few years. She could barely walk to the bathroom without being totally out of breath and near fainting.
My alcohol background includes a father who was so much of a drunk he went out for a gallon of milk one night and was gone for 3 days (long before the days of cell phones). I've got a dozen stories like it, every single one was alcohol fueled. Ended when I didn't see him for over 2 years after he had been my Dad for the first ~11 years of my life. When you are in 5th grade and you begin to realize you might never see your Dad again,... makes for a pretty shitty childhood.
My wife's Dad was very similar, he would start drinking at lunch time some days and that was the end of it, treated everyone in the family like total shit and we had to tiptoe around him. He beat my brother in law like a grown fvkn man while he cowered in the corner with the rest of the family watching in horror. My mother in law still deals with it today (I've been married for 25 years this month). Same with many of my friends growing up, families totally torn apart by alcohol abuse usually coupled with at minimum mental abuse, many of us both mental and physical.
Tons of excuses, lots of ways for me and others I know to make up reasons why one or both of our parents were worthless.
Take a wild guess how many people I know who were casual or habitual marijuana users and shit on their family like my first hand examples above?
Zero.
I thought I had read that legislation passed that this would not be enforced in MDA coworker of mine asked me this question and I had no idea so I started looking into this for him and can not find a straight answer.
So the situation is, a coworker of mine has several guns, hunts and what not. His wife is going through a medical issue and is in the process of getting her Medical marijuana card to help with the medical issue. So as it currently sits, it is pretty clear that in doing so she can no longer obtain or transfer any weapons and it seems that she must give up the current weapons she "owns". The gray area is, does her husband have to do the same? I cannot find anything that touches on her husbands weapons or weapons within the house etc.
Does anyone have any information or can help shed some light on how to legally tread these waters?
https://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.c...-denying-firearms-to-medical-marijuana-users/A coworker of mine asked me this question and I had no idea so I started looking into this for him and can not find a straight answer.
So the situation is, a coworker of mine has several guns, hunts and what not. His wife is going through a medical issue and is in the process of getting her Medical marijuana card to help with the medical issue. So as it currently sits, it is pretty clear that in doing so she can no longer obtain or transfer any weapons and it seems that she must give up the current weapons she "owns". The gray area is, does her husband have to do the same? I cannot find anything that touches on her husbands weapons or weapons within the house etc.
Does anyone have any information or can help shed some light on how to legally tread these waters?
My dad started smoking at the age of 15 and smoked for the next 41 years of his life. He didn't die from tobacco he died from complications of alcohol consumption. My dad's sister started smoking at 15 too and died at the age of 80 from colon cancer, the Pall Mall non-filtered cigarettes she smoked for 65 years didn't kill her. My dad was a naval officer. For the first 10 years of my life he was gone 75% of the time. For the later half of the 60's he was always in WestPac. He earned 23 stars on his Vietnam service ribbon. He was at MACV from May of '67 to May of '68, I don't need to hear about the possibility of your dad not coming home.
Generalities are okay but they don't apply to everyone. Your experiences are not everyone's experiences.
https://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.c...-denying-firearms-to-medical-marijuana-users/
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
It's called Nullification.
Thomas Jefferson started it.
Only passed the Senate. Died in the House. And even that MD bill would not (could not) alter federal law.
State law doesn't override the fact that the prohibition is Federal Law.I would argue that there's already a carve-out for holders of a medical marijuana card. Section 13-3313(a)(1) of the Health-General Article of the MD Code provides that a qualifying patient may not be subject to arrest, prosecution, or any civil or administrative penalty . . . or be denied any right or privilege, for the medical use of or possession of medical cannabis."
That seems pretty clear to me that a gun owner cannot be stripped of his or her right to own/possess/use that gun on account of being a card holder, nor can he or she be prohibited from owning/possessing/using a gun that he/she acquired after obtaining a card. I am not familiar with the issue, but I believe that the State Police has taken some position to the effect that they won't approve a 77R unless a patient has relinquished a card for 12 months, but, if that's true, I think that's phooey.
State law doesn't override the fact that the prohibition is Federal Law.
Being a retired Fed, that's had my share of random drug tests, we were made well aware of the fact that it's still illegal under Federal Law.
Sent from my LG-G710 using Tapatalk