Mike Smigiel's thoughts on Hogan

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • CrazySanMan

    2013'er
    Mar 4, 2013
    11,390
    Colorful Colorado
    If Hogan wins this election, he will be the first two-term Republican governor in decades. How is that not a step forward? Re-electing Hogan means Republicans actually have a chance in MD. Re-electing Hogan means we have a shot at drawing better districts after the 2020 census, allowing more conservative candidates to actually get elected downballot. Re-electing Hogan means we get to tread water long enough to make some headway on taking the state away from the Democrats.

    Do not let perfect become the enemy of good. We'd be stupid not to take the best chance we have in MD. Some of us don't have the luxury of being able to pick up and move after November.

    First, Hogan isn't really a republican. He is farther left than Colorado's democrat governor Hickenlooper on just about every issue. Hogan can only be called a republican in liberal strongholds like MD, NJ, CA, or maybe NV. I wouldn't call a gun grabbing RINO a step forward. He might be 1/2 a step back instead of a full step back, but he's still moving back.

    The redistricting argument is simply not true.

    The governor submits a plan for redistricting. The MGA also works on a plan for redistricting. If the MGA can't pass a redistricting plan in a certain amount of time the governor's plan is enacted, but if the MGA passes a plan theirs is enacted. The MGA will never let a "republican" governor's plan succeed.

    Now, if Maryland republicans began fighting and demanding better candidates ten years ago, you might be in a better position with more MGA seats than you have now. You can start now and plan for the 2030 redistricting, if there are any R's left in Maryland by then.
     

    MrsRab1515

    Active Member
    Nov 27, 2017
    116
    All over the dang state
    First, Hogan isn't really a republican. He is farther left than Colorado's democrat governor Hickenlooper on just about every issue. Hogan can only be called a republican in liberal strongholds like MD, NJ, CA, or maybe NV. I wouldn't call a gun grabbing RINO a step forward. He might be 1/2 a step back instead of a full step back, but he's still moving back.

    The redistricting argument is simply not true.

    The governor submits a plan for redistricting. The MGA also works on a plan for redistricting. If the MGA can't pass a redistricting plan in a certain amount of time the governor's plan is enacted, but if the MGA passes a plan theirs is enacted. The MGA will never let a "republican" governor's plan succeed.

    He's more conservative than any other realistic option in MD, and letting MD citizens see an "R" by their governor's name might make it more palatable for them to pull the "R" lever in the future. Just because it's not as good as CO doesn't mean it's not a step forward for MD.

    I understand how redistricting works, thanks. I'd rather have the slight possibility (hence "chance") of a map drawn by an R governor than the guarantee of a map drawn by a D, be it governor or MGA.

    We managed to wrestle the governorship from the D's in 2014, and many here are getting ready to hand it right back over, giving back any ground we've covered in the last four years.
     

    dist1646

    Ultimate Member
    May 1, 2012
    8,784
    Eldersburg
    I would rather not lose everything. A famous person once said something along the lines of I would rather keep 80% of something and go back and fight for the other 20%, than to lose everything.

    Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
    If the founding fathers had believed that, we would still be English subjects!

    When you are in a fight, fight to win!
     

    teratos

    My hair is amazing
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Jan 22, 2009
    59,824
    Bel Air
    First, Hogan isn't really a republican. He is farther left than Colorado's democrat governor Hickenlooper on just about every issue. Hogan can only be called a republican in liberal strongholds like MD, NJ, CA, or maybe NV. I wouldn't call a gun grabbing RINO a step forward. He might be 1/2 a step back instead of a full step back, but he's still moving back.

    The redistricting argument is simply not true.

    The governor submits a plan for redistricting. The MGA also works on a plan for redistricting. If the MGA can't pass a redistricting plan in a certain amount of time the governor's plan is enacted, but if the MGA passes a plan theirs is enacted. The MGA will never let a "republican" governor's plan succeed.

    Now, if Maryland republicans began fighting and demanding better candidates ten years ago, you might be in a better position with more MGA seats than you have now. You can start now and plan for the 2030 redistricting, if there are any R's left in Maryland by then.

    Unfortunately, you start with a flawed premise.....that Maryland will elect someone more conservative than Hogan. A Pro-2A platform is going nowhere fast, here. If you don't live in one of the "big 3" counties, you don't understand what a scourge liberalism is in this state. I live in Harford, and am generally surrounded by like-minded people. Go spend some time in PG or Montgomery County and see how many hearts and minds you can win over with a conservative platform. You would be pissing into the wind.
     

    East2West

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Jul 20, 2013
    902
    Nomalley, Nobama
    I don't think you understand what "little r" republicanism is.

    Perhaps you're right, im not infallible and im always willing to learn.

    Does little r republicanism involve placing party over priciples? Does it involve giving up essential liberties? Maybe i am using the phrase the wrong way.
     

    CrazySanMan

    2013'er
    Mar 4, 2013
    11,390
    Colorful Colorado
    He's more conservative than any other realistic option in MD, and letting MD citizens see an "R" by their governor's name might make it more palatable for them to pull the "R" lever in the future. Just because it's not as good as CO doesn't mean it's not a step forward for MD.

    I understand how redistricting works, thanks. I'd rather have the slight possibility (hence "chance") of a map drawn by an R governor than the guarantee of a map drawn by a D, be it governor or MGA.

    We managed to wrestle the governorship from the D's in 2014, and many here are getting ready to hand it right back over, giving back any ground we've covered in the last four years.

    When Hogan is the only "conservative" you are in serious trouble.

    How did Maryland get to see Hogan as a Champion of Conservatism? By the republicans constantly voting for the candidate who bad, but not quite as bad as the other guy. At some point you need to take a stand and break that cycle. Until that point, it's 8 more years of slow decline at best and rapid decline at worst. I say 8 because Hogan winning now will ensure another RINO as a republican candidate in 2022.
     

    eruby

    Confederate Jew
    MDS Supporter
    kramer.jpg
     

    East2West

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Jul 20, 2013
    902
    Nomalley, Nobama
    If Hogan wins this election, he will be the first two-term Republican governor in decades. How is that not a step forward? Re-electing Hogan means Republicans actually have a chance in MD. Re-electing Hogan means we have a shot at drawing better districts after the 2020 census, allowing more conservative candidates to actually get elected downballot. Re-electing Hogan means we get to tread water long enough to make some headway on taking the state away from the Democrats.

    Do not let perfect become the enemy of good. We'd be stupid not to take the best chance we have in MD. Some of us don't have the luxury of being able to pick up and move after November.


    -Its not a step forward because the man is a Republican In Name Only.
    -Again and again, Hogan CANNOT unilaterally redraw the districts. The MGA(Read Mike & Mike) have the final say.
    -How does rubber stamping Hogan Conservatism (read moderate liberalism), lead to more conservative candidates in the future? As has been stated here many times, and will be affirmed when Larry win, truly conservatives need not apply for election, they arent welcome here.
     

    CrazySanMan

    2013'er
    Mar 4, 2013
    11,390
    Colorful Colorado
    Unfortunately, you start with a flawed premise.....that Maryland will elect someone more conservative than Hogan. A Pro-2A platform is going nowhere fast, here. If you don't live in one of the "big 3" counties, you don't understand what a scourge liberalism is in this state. I live in Harford, and am generally surrounded by like-minded people. Go spend some time in PG or Montgomery County and see how many hearts and minds you can win over with a conservative platform. You would be pissing into the wind.

    I lived in Parkville in Baltimore County, a Joe Flacco pass from the city line, most of my life. I worked in Rockville and Greenbelt for about the last 10 years I lived in Maryland (commuting from Parkville daily), so I know all about Montgomery and PGC and Baltimore City.

    I've said in other posts in other Hogan threads that you don't need a Tackleberry to run for governor. You need someone who would have vetoed 1302, not someone who would have called for it.

    You might see Hogan as "helping" the 2A because he's not as anti-gun as Jealous is, but Hogan is still anti-gun and in 2022 your 2A rights will be worse than they are now no matter who is in the governor's mansion. How does that help?
     

    Boondock Saint

    Ultimate Member
    Dec 11, 2008
    24,444
    White Marsh
    Maybe one of the smartest posts I've read on MDS. You're right-Clinton was all about keeping the illegals out and welfare reform and even had his face on a confederate flag! But these days? No way that dog will hunt. Yes, the whole enchilada has moved left (can I say enchilada? Maybe that's racist.) I don't envy people in MD. I think Hogan is a first class turd and I would never support him. But I also recognize that Jealous is far worse. I'm glad I don't "have" to make the decision. Hey I'm in VA-I have my own shitty governor to deal with!

    Excellent post.

    excellent post. :thumbsup:

    Thank you, gentlemen. I'm occasionally capable of semi-coherent thought. :D

    No, they just simply pit us against each other. Maryland didn't become like this overnight, it will not change overnight. We were have to deal with the here and now. We need to groom candidates for the future at the same time. We have to get the Republican party to invest in Maryland. We have to explain rationally our positions. We have to take back the media and things like that which espouse to liberal ideas.

    Behold the politics of fear.

    "We have to vote for Trump/Romney/McCain because Hillary/Obama will destroy America!"

    "Vote for Hillary/Obama or else Trump/Romney/McCain will start World War III!"

    Sound familiar? It's the same argument from both "sides," just different names inserted over the years.

    "Gotta vote for Hogan because Jealous will have us all on bread lines."

    "Gotta vote for Jealous so he can restore the third world ghettos of this state into centers of cultural revolution."

    If the cycle is allowed to continue, in part because voters refuse to see past the veneer of ********, when does the shining knight on the white horse come to our collective relief? It certainly won't be after the voters prove to the MDGOP that RINOs like Hogan are what the people want.


    When Hogan is the only "conservative" you are in serious trouble.

    How did Maryland get to see Hogan as a Champion of Conservatism? By the republicans constantly voting for the candidate who bad, but not quite as bad as the other guy. At some point you need to take a stand and break that cycle. Until that point, it's 8 more years of slow decline at best and rapid decline at worst. I say 8 because Hogan winning now will ensure another RINO as a republican candidate in 2022.

    Indeed. Come late June 2022 after our open Republican primary, there will be a chorus of people who will demand that we form in lockstep behind the gubernatorial nominee because he's what we've got, and the other guy will bring the third world ghettos to our doorstep. It's easy to see if you look for it.
     

    MrsRab1515

    Active Member
    Nov 27, 2017
    116
    All over the dang state
    Getting a more conservative, more 2A-friendly candidate in this state is a non-starter. The populace rejects it. Those of us who can't leave must do what we can to hold the line while we work at changing hearts and minds on the individual level.

    Fixing the districts would help, too, so that the swaths of conservative areas can actually see some real representation. Hogan may not be able to unilaterally redraw the districts, but perhaps he can get a bill passed that gives that authority to a non-partisan third party. Maybe he can do it before 2020. I know Jealous won't even try.

    Unfortunately the governor's office is weak when held by an R thanks to our friends in the MGA. But the one-two punch of D governor plus D MGA would mean there's no point in trying anymore. As far as 2018 is concerned, it's Hogan or bust. Rejecting Hogan means, realistically, de facto Jealous. Why on earth would we think that's better? Sure, it would be great if a more conservative candidate had a chance. But that's not the reality we live in.
     

    Vetted84

    Active Member
    Nov 8, 2016
    646
    He's more conservative than any other realistic option in MD, and letting MD citizens see an "R" by their governor's name might make it more palatable for them to pull the "R" lever in the future. Just because it's not as good as CO doesn't mean it's not a step forward for MD.

    I understand how redistricting works, thanks. I'd rather have the slight possibility (hence "chance") of a map drawn by an R governor than the guarantee of a map drawn by a D, be it governor or MGA.

    We managed to wrestle the governorship from the D's in 2014, and many here are getting ready to hand it right back over, giving back any ground we've covered in the last four years.

    Might make it more palatable for some to vote for Hogan but not for all of us.
    The -R- next to Hogan's name fooled some of us in '14, not going to fool us in '18.
     

    CrazySanMan

    2013'er
    Mar 4, 2013
    11,390
    Colorful Colorado
    Getting a more conservative, more 2A-friendly candidate in this state is a non-starter. The populace rejects it. Those of us who can't leave must do what we can to hold the line while we work at changing hearts and minds on the individual level.

    Fixing the districts would help, too, so that the swaths of conservative areas can actually see some real representation. Hogan may not be able to unilaterally redraw the districts, but perhaps he can get a bill passed that gives that authority to a non-partisan third party. Maybe he can do it before 2020. I know Jealous won't even try.

    Unfortunately the governor's office is weak when held by an R thanks to our friends in the MGA. But the one-two punch of D governor plus D MGA would mean there's no point in trying anymore. As far as 2018 is concerned, it's Hogan or bust. Rejecting Hogan means, realistically, de facto Jealous. Why on earth would we think that's better? Sure, it would be great if a more conservative candidate had a chance. But that's not the reality we live in.

    Sounds like you already gave in and quit.

    The irony is that a Jealous term or two will lead to more conservative republican candidates. Another Hogan term will lead to another left-shift and a moderate democrat running with an R next to his or her name. Jealous and Hogan will both drive the state left for the next 4 to 8 years, but Jealous might help the state swing a bit more right afterwards while Hogan will continue it to the left.
     

    MrsRab1515

    Active Member
    Nov 27, 2017
    116
    All over the dang state
    Sounds like you already gave in and quit.

    The irony is that a Jealous term or two will lead to more conservative republican candidates. Another Hogan term will lead to another left-shift and a moderate democrat running with an R next to his or her name. Jealous and Hogan will both drive the state left for the next 4 to 8 years, but Jealous might help the state swing a bit more right afterwards while Hogan will continue it to the left.

    Hogan was a right swing after O'Malley.
     

    teratos

    My hair is amazing
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Jan 22, 2009
    59,824
    Bel Air
    Perhaps you're right, im not infallible and im always willing to learn.

    Does little r republicanism involve placing party over priciples? Does it involve giving up essential liberties? Maybe i am using the phrase the wrong way.

    No, quite the opposite. What you describe is "big R" Republicanism.
     

    NatBoh

    Ultimate Member
    Jan 4, 2012
    2,708
    Baltimore
    For many years and election cycles I fell for the fear-mongering put forth by the Republican party. Every election was the election of our lifetimes, and there would be dire consequences if I didn’t vote for their candidate.


    And after I helped elect those candidates to office, I watched our national debt skyrocket, watched the erosion of freedoms and essential liberties, saw new beaureacratic agencies created, saw them take us wars not of neccesity, but of choice, saw the tentacles of big, nanny state government further intrude into American’s lives, and watched as they took the very same actions they told me the other, evil party was going to do.

    I realized that there isn’t a damn bit of difference between the two corrupt, major parties. Further, that the shell game they play can’t exist without the other party acting as strawman. And we eat that shit like candy.

    I have unshackeled myself from this enslavement. I no longer buy into their fear-mongering, and I vote the candidate that best
    reflects my values and beliefs, regardless of party. It may be an R, it may be a L, and even occasionally it’s a D.

    I don’t vote for candidates that infringe on essential liberties, and certainly not for ones that leverage that liberty for political gain, and then disregard it when a new political expediency is needed.

    These type of people stand for nothing other than their own political power. They are traitors to the Constitution they took an oath to support and defend.

    I have watched Hogan happily sign gun control bills into law surrounded by the gun-grabbers, stood by as he has not used techniques at his disposal that would ease burdens on 2A, has now stated that he would refuse an NRA endorsement, and has written an opinion piece touting his desire for deeper, and further infringements on the 2A.

    I don’t know exactly who I’ll be voting for, but pretty sure I’ve ruled out a couple of candidates so far.
     

    CrazySanMan

    2013'er
    Mar 4, 2013
    11,390
    Colorful Colorado
    For many years and election cycles I fell for the fear-mongering put forth by the Republican party. Every election was the election of our lifetimes, and there would be dire consequences if I didn’t vote for their candidate.


    And after I helped elect those candidates to office, I watched our national debt skyrocket, watched the erosion of freedoms and essential liberties, saw new beaureacratic agencies created, saw them take us wars not of neccesity, but of choice, saw the tentacles of big, nanny state government further intrude into American’s lives, and watched as they took the very same actions they told me the other, evil party was going to do.

    I realized that there isn’t a damn bit of difference between the two corrupt, major parties. Further, that the shell game they play can’t exist without the other party acting as strawman. And we eat that shit like candy.

    I have unshackeled myself from this enslavement. I no longer buy into their fear-mongering, and I vote the candidate that best
    reflects my values and beliefs, regardless of party. It may be an R, it may be a L, and even occasionally it’s a D.

    I don’t vote for candidates that infringe on essential liberties, and certainly not for ones that leverage that liberty for political gain, and then disregard it when a new political expediency is needed.

    These type of people stand for nothing other than their own political power. They are traitors to the Constitution they took an oath to support and defend.

    I have watched Hogan happily sign gun control bills into law surrounded by the gun-grabbers, stood by as he has not used techniques at his disposal that would ease burdens on 2A, has now stated that he would refuse an NRA endorsement, and has written an opinion piece touting his desire for deeper, and further infringements on the 2A.

    I don’t know exactly who I’ll be voting for, but pretty sure I’ve ruled out a couple of candidates so far.

    Get out of my head!

    We're on the exact same wavelength. :party29:
     

    Raineman

    On the 3rd box
    Dec 27, 2008
    3,547
    Eldersburg
    I have watched Hogan happily sign gun control bills into law surrounded by the gun-grabbers, stood by as he has not used techniques at his disposal that would ease burdens on 2A, has now stated that he would refuse an NRA endorsement, and has written an opinion piece touting his desire for deeper, and further infringements on the 2A.

    I don’t know exactly who I’ll be voting for, .


    ^^This.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,323
    Messages
    7,277,222
    Members
    33,436
    Latest member
    DominicM

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom