SAF SUES IN MARYLAND OVER HANDGUN PERMIT DENIAL UPDATED 3-5-12

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    dblas

    Past President, MSI
    MDS Supporter
    Apr 6, 2011
    13,087
    One thing concerns me, that is, if MD denies the permit applications, then it is hurtful when one applies for a CCW in another state, because these states sometimes ask if one has ever been turned down by another state and the reason why. It doesn't help.

    You keep stating this every chance you get, how about specifics, which states, and which times (since you state "sometimes")?
     

    esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,407
    Does declaratory relief still get us what we want? Or will it take yet another suit? What is the point of a declaratory statement without an injunction against the offending text of law??

    This is a little arcane (ok, a lot arcane). The difference between declaratory and injunctive relief is the latter is coercive while the former "declares" the law but doesn't actually coerce. The declaratory relief issued by the judge in this case declares that 5(ii) is unconstitutional and yes, that is what you want. The court has declared that the 2A applies outside the home and that Section 5(ii) is unconstitutional. And that's a huge constitutional holding.

    Now Alan Gura asked for declaratory relief and he got what he asked for with the court's ruling. But he ALSO asked for two types of injunctive relief: 1. a mandatory injunction requiring the state to give Mr. Woollard his permit and 2. a prohibitory injunction barring the state from applying for enforcing Section 5(ii) (that's the G&S provision). The court's opinion and order never expressly addressed these injunctive requests for relief. I don't know why. Maybe it was an oversight or maybe he didn't think it was necessary (as the State suggests) and simply forgot to expressly address it. See below. Who knows. Hence the motion for Rule 59(e) clarification. It is was perfectly appropriate for the State to raise it.

    Now, it does make a difference. An injunction is enforceable with the full weight of the court's contempt powers and is coercive. Under Rule 65(d), an injunctive order has to be quite detailed and specific for that reason. If you violate an injunctive order, the violator can (conceivably) go to jail or be fined for contempt. That fine can be designed to be punitive (that's criminal contempt) or a daily fine imposed until there is compliance (that is coercive and considered to be civil contempt as you hold the keys to your jail cell -- comply and you get out or the fines stop). You need a stay for sure to avoid the possibility of contempt when an injunction has issued.

    In contrast, a declaratory judgment is not enforceable through contempt. Under SCT precedent, the Court has stated from time to time that declaratory relief is usually good enough when the defendant is the sovereign State as the courts will presume that the states don't need to be coerced but will comply with declaratory judgment. It is an expression of comity for another sovereign. Almost invariably, in this sort of constitutional litigation at this level, that respect is warranted and honored. As a rule, States don't defy federal court declaratory judgments. If they do, then the same court issues an actual injunction in an enforcement action and the fireworks begin. Won't be necessary in this case, I'm sure.

    Indeed, in this case, the State's Rule 59(e)/stay motion states that the state's policy is to comply with an unstayed declaratory judgment, which is why they seek a stay even in the absence of an actual injunction so they don't have to comply pending appeal. That's smart. Thus, if the stay is denied by the district court and the court of appeals, presumably the State would comply with the court's declaratory judgment and process Mr. Wollard's application without regard to section 5(ii) and otherwise not apply Section 5(ii) to other new and pending applications. I would expect Alan Gura to press for clarification on that point in his papers. I would. I think he has already started that process in demanding that the state file a proposed order. That's smart. If the stay is granted, Mr. Woollard doesn't get his renewal permit and the State continues to apply Section 5(ii) to existing and new applications pending this appeal. What you are seeing here is some strong litigation skills from both the State and Alan Gura and his team. Fun to watch. Sorry you asked?
     
    Last edited:

    esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,407
    I'm wondering, did the judge leave his opinion vague in an attempt give md some room to wiggle? Only they didn't realize that and are now messing with the bull? It just seems this whole law suit has followed this trend and their not seeing the writing on the wall.

    See post above.
     

    Gray Peterson

    Active Member
    Aug 18, 2009
    422
    Lynnwood, WA
    You are kidding, right? Heller and McDonald are the only reason you have *any* 2A rights in Maryland. They are absolutely HUGE

    Not to mention what I said before about the gun owners of DC, Chicago too....

    He suffers from a mental illness called BGOS (Battered Gun Owner Syndrome), a common though minority affliction in states that are not "shall issue".
     

    clandestine

    AR-15 Savant
    Oct 13, 2008
    37,031
    Elkton, MD
    You are kidding, right? Heller and McDonald are the only reason you have *any* 2A rights in Maryland. They are absolutely HUGE

    Some people dont get it, they think one court ruling will erode a hundred years of precedent/law/ordinances.

    Some people think having 2A rights means you should carry RPG's, point tommy guns at cops and "say Ha, ha, it my rights, you cant shoot till I do", shoot targets at the local playground, twirl guns while shopping at walmart, all with no legal recourse. Since Heller didnt allow that for them, they think Heller didnt do anything. :sad20:
     

    Glaug-Eldare

    Senior Member
    BANNED!!!
    Jan 17, 2011
    1,837
    Some people dont get it, they think one court ruling will erode a hundred years of precedent/law/ordinances.

    Some people think having 2A rights means you should carry RPG's, point tommy guns at cops and "say Ha, ha, it my rights, you cant shoot till I do", shoot targets at the local playground, twirl guns while shopping at walmart, all with no legal recourse. Since Heller didnt allow that for them, they think Heller didnt do anything. :sad20:

    What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you understand? :blah:
     

    esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,407
    Not to mention what I said before about the gun owners of DC, Chicago too....

    He suffers from a mental illness called BGOS (Battered Gun Owner Syndrome), a common though minority affliction in states that are not "shall issue".

    Jeez, that's really sad, understandable after all these years of abuse from the anti gun zealots, but still sad. But, I bet it is treatable. All you need is some more victories.
     

    esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,407
    Some people think having 2A rights means you should carry RPG's, point tommy guns at cops and "say Ha, ha, it my rights, you cant shoot till I do", shoot targets at the local playground, twirl guns while shopping at walmart, all with no legal recourse. :

    I don't know anyone like that. Can't imagine that anyone on these forums does that sort of nonsense. Heller and McDonald and the 2A protect the right to keep and bear arms by responsible, law-abiding citizens. I have no patience for the rest, who should probably best reside in jail, IMHO>
     

    Kharn

    Ultimate Member
    Mar 9, 2008
    3,578
    Hazzard County
    One thing concerns me, that is, if MD denies the permit applications, then it is hurtful when one applies for a CCW in another state, because these states sometimes ask if one has ever been turned down by another state and the reason why. It doesn't help.
    Your justification is simply "Maryland did not find that I demonstrated 'good and substantial reason' for a handgun permit"

    No shall-issue state is going to deny your permit due to failing to receive a may-issue permit.
     

    MDresident

    Active Member
    Sep 22, 2010
    126
    The point most folks are missing is not the contistutional "right"; that is established. It is the Maryland state governing body that does not recogonize that right even as defined in the Bill of Rights it so ratified.
    Folks thinking that Maryland will bow to indications that it is obstructing rights afforded its citenzenry by the constitution is unfounded. Do you have that much faith in Marylandisstan? Again, I hope I am wrong. I really do...
    Motion for stay.
    Motion for appeal.
    Motion for this.
    Motion for that.
    Do you still think Maryland consideres the United States Constituion and the Bill of Rights as having pertinent relevance or authority?

    It's for the children!
    Guns are bad.
    Our law abinding citenzenry are baaad!
    The police will protect us all!
    But, they are not obligated nor required to do so.
    you can't sue us for negligence....
    pay your taxes anyway
     

    Glaug-Eldare

    Senior Member
    BANNED!!!
    Jan 17, 2011
    1,837
    The point most folks are missing is not the contistutional "right"; that is established. It is the Maryland state governing body that does not recogonize that right even as defined in the Bill of Rights it so ratified.
    Folks thinking that Maryland will bow to indications that it is obstructing rights afforded its citenzenry by the constitution is unfounded. Do you have that much faith in Marylandisstan? Again, I hope I am wrong. I really do...
    Motion for stay.
    Motion for appeal.
    Motion for this.
    Motion for that.
    Do you still think Maryland consideres the United States Constituion and the Bill of Rights as having pertinent relevance or authority?

    Would ya knock it off with those negative waves? If you're resigned to defeat, there's no point in you posting in this section. Seriously, there are bunch of other, perfectly good sections. Check 'em out.
     

    Mark75H

    MD Wear&Carry Instructor
    Industry Partner
    MDS Supporter
    Sep 25, 2011
    17,172
    Outside the Gates
    Would ya knock it off with those negative waves? If you're resigned to defeat, there's no point in you posting in this section. Seriously, there are bunch of other, perfectly good sections. Check 'em out.

    There is such a thing as negativity and such a thing as reality ... I think its coming, its just not here yet (as many seem to assume).
     

    Klunatic

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 28, 2011
    2,923
    Montgomery Cty
    Some people dont get it, they think one court ruling will erode a hundred years of precedent/law/ordinances.

    Some people think having 2A rights means you should carry RPG's, point tommy guns at cops and "say Ha, ha, it my rights, you cant shoot till I do", shoot targets at the local playground, twirl guns while shopping at walmart, all with no legal recourse. Since Heller didnt allow that for them, they think Heller didnt do anything. :sad20:

    We won a big victory here. Think of it this way, the seeds of the 2a freedom tree were planted a few years back with Heller and others. The tree has taken root and flowered with the Woolard decision. The sun has shown on the dogs ass and now we are experiencing a little rain & BS from Gansler. Have patience this will only make it all the much sweeter when the tree bears fruit.

    I can't imagine what we would be listening to had Legg ruled the other way. Smile we are in better shape now than in the last 30 years.
     

    MDresident

    Active Member
    Sep 22, 2010
    126
    Again, I hope I am wrong. I really do...

    I really do hope I am wrong. But, I really just can't seem to float that happiness/victory balloon right now. Nothing, again, NOTHING, from the Maryland state government is in "our" favor. All favorited statements, comments and/or rullings are from the other courts.
    Maryland will fight this till their cold dead hands no longer viable.
    I trully wish it was different.
    Does anyone know whtether the Wollard gentleman received his permit?
    That would be relevant.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    274,915
    Messages
    7,258,419
    Members
    33,348
    Latest member
    Eric_Hehl

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom