HB1302-"The Neighborhood Bag Lady Can Take Your Guns" bill

blipper · Apr 9, 2018

(D) (1) BEFORE GRANTING, DENYING, OR MODIFYING A FINAL EXTREME 12 RISK PREVENTION ORDER UNDER THIS SECTION, THE COURT SHALL REVIEW ALL 13 OPEN AND SHIELDED COURT RECORDS INVOLVING THE PETITIONER AND THE 14 RESPONDENT, INCLUDING RECORDS OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER: 15
(I) THE CRIMINAL LAW ARTICLE; 16
(II) TITLE 3, SUBTITLE 15 OF THE COURTS ARTICLE; 17
(III) TITLE 4, SUBTITLE 5 OF THE FAMILY LAW ARTICLE; 18
(IV) TITLE 10, SUBTITLE 6 OF THE HEALTH – GENERAL 19 ARTICLE; AND 20
(V) THIS ARTICLE. 21
(2) THE COURT’S FAILURE TO REVIEW RECORDS UNDER THIS 22 SUBSECTION DOES NOT AFFECT THE VALIDITY OF AN ORDER ISSUED UNDER THIS 23 SECTION. 24
(E) (1)

The highlighted part concerns me -- the court is required to review the bckgroound of the relationship of petitioner and respondent -- that's good -- but if it doesn't, the order's still good.

Stoveman · Apr 9, 2018

I'm guessing two of my three turds, Lam and Hill, were allowed to vote no by the puppet master. Still surprises me.

And Afzali voted no after she told us she was voting yes? FredCo she's all yours, lol.

Beach Runner · Apr 9, 2018

pbharvey said:
Here you go.

Crap that looks like Afzali may have voted no in that picture. I will still hold her feet to the fire for that earlier vote if so.

Dogmeat · Apr 9, 2018

Well, not that it will do any good, but here was my email to the Govenor...

Gov. Hogan,

I cannot express sufficiently my disdain for the passage of HB1302 during this last minute flail by the General Assembly. How anyone can possibly believe that confiscating personal property, without due process, on the unsubstantiated statement of an third party is beyond comprehension. What's next? Confiscation of my automobile because I decided to have an adult beverage in the sanctity of my home because I MIGHT decide to drive to the store because I ran out of snacks after I had a drink?

There are so many constitutional violations in this bill that it will almost certainly end up winding its way to the Supreme Court, costing the Tax Payers of Maryland millions of dollars, and this after the GA confiscated the tax refunds due to Tax Payers of Maryland associated with the changes to Federal Law.

There is no justification for this type of legislation, ever!

You Must VETO This Travesty of a Bill!

Sincerely,

Dogmeat

Stoveman · Apr 9, 2018

Stoveman said:
I'm guessing two of my three turds, Lam and Hill, were allowed to vote no by the puppet master. Still surprises me.

And Afzali voted no after she told us she was voting yes? FredCo she's all yours, lol.

Here's a better pic. Ignore everything I said a few minutes ago.

NoMoreTreadingOnUs · Apr 9, 2018

Thanks. A little fuzzy on my screen - safe to assume Brochin was a yes?

Fredcohunter · Apr 9, 2018

More no votes than I expected to be honest.

Stoveman · Apr 9, 2018

NoMoreTreadingOnUs said:
Thanks. A little fuzzy on my screen - safe to assume Brochin was a yes?

This was a vote by the House.

NoMoreTreadingOnUs · Apr 9, 2018

Scratch that - forgot this was a House vote.

Beach Runner · Apr 9, 2018

Fredcohunter said:
More no votes than I expected to be honest.

Permitted No votes by Dems whose seats they were worried about this fall. Yes votes by Republicans worry me more.

Squaregrouper · Apr 9, 2018

Well folks, if this doesn't get vetoed by Hogan, I will be out of Marylandistan by 10/1/2018.
I went through this before it was codified. I won't go through it again- especially with the "state's" blessing.

iH8DemLibz · Apr 9, 2018

Is it to late to demand that the MGA give us reach arounds?

MigraineMan · Apr 9, 2018

Slightly-less-fuzzy vote board, followed by the recorded tally.

MigraineMan · Apr 10, 2018

Who are those lovely ladies sitting behind Rack in the House gallery?

(yes, he knew they were there)

Abacab · Apr 10, 2018

Nice to see my two delegates, Aumann and West, voted for this trash. They didn't respond to my first email. I'm going to send a second telling them I'll vote for the Democrat because at least I won't be surprised when I get taken advantage of.

ziptiespec · Apr 10, 2018

Abacab said:
Nice to see my two delegates, Aumann and West, voted for this trash. They didn't respond to my first email. I'm going to send a second telling them I'll vote for the Democrat because at least I won't be surprised when I get taken advantage of.

Call 'em up. Tell them how you really feel

Beach Runner · Apr 10, 2018

ziptiespec said:
Call 'em up. Tell them how you really feel

Yeah I lit up Afzali in an email, then thought I had erred when I misread the vote tally board, then felt vindicated and even more pissed when I saw the clearer picture and she had voted yes.

Now I have a reason to not change to DINO status for the next primary.

Biggfoot44 · Apr 10, 2018

It's after midnite Sine Die . No point to tell them anything now . Shift gears to acting about it now .

JPG · Apr 10, 2018

My Guy (Fisher) was a no on the Deligate side. :thumbsup:

However, my Senator (Mike Miller), well enough said. :mad54:

motorcoachdoug · Apr 10, 2018

This is a sad day for the people of MD. It looks like its only a matter of time before this is used on a person who owns firearms and this will end up in federal court coasting the people a ton of $$ while MD defends its law. Would not be surprised if this ends up all the way to SCOTUS and the people will have to pay thanks to Bush and Miller plus the demorats in the MGA..

HB1302-"The Neighborhood Bag Lady Can Take Your Guns" bill

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Active Member

TV Personality

Member

Ultimate Member

TV Personality

Active Member

Active Member

TV Personality

Active Member

Member

Kragaphile

When All Else Fails.

Defenestration Specialist

Attachments

Defenestration Specialist

Attachments

Member

Active Member

Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics