Search results

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    1. D

      Cook county IL says ar15 is Same as m16

      The rate of fire argument is suddenly becoming the new talking point. Rate of fire is not defined by any federal or state statute. The mechanics of the firearm are on the other hand clearly delineated by multiple federal laws. constitutional or not the only differentiating factor is does...
    2. D

      Cali proposes yearly firearms registration and fee…

      https://sd25.senate.ca.gov/news/2024-02-14/senator-portantino-introduces-bill-requiring-annual-registration-firearms I wonder if this isn’t a bridge too far for even the most brazen of courts. A state implementing an annual use tax /or a possession tax creatively defined as a reoccurring...
    3. D

      BRYAN DAVID RANGE v ATF

      Looks like garland and doj submitted for cert yesterday. That’ll make an Interesting contrast to rahimi if SCOTUS takes it
    4. D

      Duncan v Berrcerra

      So in the world of theoretical? So if the ninth does what they like to do…. And the en banc overturns the district court ruling. And Scotus takes the case under review with an appeal. A grant and vacate could be issued reinstating the district courts ruling?
    5. D

      Challenges to ATF “Ghost Gun” Final Rule (ATF 2021R-05) Megathread

      I’m curious if justice Alito sees this case as a quick opportunity to affirm the 5th ruling in its entirety or advise the lower courts and keep the guardrails up preventing other pending cases from receiving a distorted form of THT from a lower court looking to play games with similar details
    6. D

      AG says Fed law does not protect manufacturers from state law.

      The dormant commerce clause is colliding with state police powers. I suspect or i am hopeful that National Pork Producers VS Ross (CA) will yield some insight into to power of states to influence commerce, products and production outside of their state boundaries. States with oversized...
    7. D

      HUGE 2A VICTORY-US Appeals Court Issues New Opinion Finding Federal Gun Control Law Unconstitutional

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Stewart_(2003) Yes it would maybe we could see the scourge of the Stewart case die it’s death.
    8. D

      ATF Coming After Firearms with Stabilizing Braces

      Ive always wondered this, as well if there are 630k fully automatic arms in private law abiding hands why then are the rest of the law abiding civilians denied the opportunity to pay the tax and secure a fully automatic if they so choose? There might be more fully automatic weapons in...
    9. D

      NY ordered to answer to SCOTUS

      http://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22A557/251278/20230103154502214_22A557%20Br%20in%20Opposition.pdf respondents opposition has been posted
    10. D

      GOA files Emergency app with USSC for PI in Antonyuk v Nigrelli

      I don’t think so Justice Sotomayor May not have the patience or humor deal with something she sees as resolved. Unless the state or ca2 can come up with a unique and convincing argument I’d read this as a shot across the bow of her patience has run out and there are better battles to try and...
    11. D

      Duncan v Berrcerra

      I think what prom=pted my interest in this and how CA's varying rules/ bans affect the overall marketplace was in reading some of the breifs and the SCOTUS statements during orals a few weeks ago. on automobiles, CA is granted authority ot regulate emissions through the clean air act by...
    12. D

      Duncan v Berrcerra

      I’ve always wondered where does a state derive the power to ban? The act of a state banning a product affects interstate commerce. A state regulating or putting conditions on sales of any product is one thing. If it is demonstrably a risk to health or society. But that would seem to be a...
    13. D

      Roe v. Richardson

      i always have found the argument that "the government can ban" or cease to accept registrations while grandfathering in previously legal registrations seems to run counter to equal application, it essitally creates to classes of citizens, those who were allowed to pat he tax and those who we ban...
    14. D

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      Dump the Bruen case on a thursday or friday, its less controversial and will fizzle over a weekend news cycle. EPA comes out on a tuesday..... then dump the dobbs case thursday or friday before the 4th of july weekend 5 days later the summer news cycle in in play and nobody gets back...
    15. D

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      I like this guys shot in the dark analysis https://slagfa.substack.com/p/nysrpa-v-bruen-an-analysis?s=r
    16. D

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      I would suspect that litigation will be necessary to define sensitive places. But it sure would be nice if a comment clarifying that sensitive places are defined by hardening, security staff and or secure perimeters where some of the legal liability is placed financially upon the entity...
    17. D

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      Im thinking that if it is a split majority opinion Roberts can still not be the one assigning If he and possibly barrett sign on to a version of a concurrence, then their vote is still part of the majority but yields a split majority. If that is the case the assignment order changes and i...
    18. D

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      That has always been my question regarding sensitive places. If government wants to claim an area is a sensitive place, secure perimeter and providing security would be the prerequisite. If private business wants to ban CC in a public forum they assume the liability of protecting their...
    19. D

      9th Circuit just ruled that there is “no right” to carry a firearm

      https://reason.com/volokh/2021/04/10/breaking-scotus-grants-injunction-in-tandon-v-newsom/ There are more than a few interesting tid bits in this. Most interesting was the comment about Roberts not having control over the direction of the court There also was some theorizing That Robert...
    20. D

      9th Circuit just ruled that there is “no right” to carry a firearm

      The 9th's use of lip service to "history, text and tradition", to blow this case up demonstrates the flaws in that system ... Just like other courts contorting around intermediate scrutiny.
    Top Bottom