They’re not paying, the tax payers are. Which is why the state always has unlimited funds and wants to keep pushing for discovery and experts.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even the justices the dissented in Bruen have to see the open insurrection of the inferior courts and be concerned with the rule of law not being followed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’ve done something with pictures.
Showed a picture of an MP Ar 15 chambered in 5.56 and an MP chambered in 22lr and asked which one was a scary black rifle that should be banned.
They couldn’t understand how they looked identical and one would be legal and one would not be.
Sent from my...
It is too bad an attorney would probably be censured, held in contempt, and arrested for interrupting the rambling judge to first thank him for his service and then ask why that is relevant to an arms ban case. And each time the judge states it for the public protection to interrupt and say but...
Maybe 8-1 to give a single dissent to the opinion but stating the dissent in no way is encouraging the behavior of the “inferior courts”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The ending seemed bad. He got run over.
And F that female judge that snapped her fingers at him saying “I’m over here”.
That is so condescending and unprofessional to snap your fingers at someone that way.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It is 100% being remanded for more discovery on “common use” and what number is common.
That’ll take years because they’ll spend a year finding numbers that support, filing briefs, rebuttals then scheduling oral arguments.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Our attorney needs to just say “it’s clear my points will not sway you and at this time we rest and look forward to the Supreme Court reviewing the transcripts”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Interesting video about how Justice Brown Jackson might’ve spilled the beans that the Chevron doctrine is being overturned which obviously would impact this case.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No need to really sum it up. It’s his analysis of the brief file on our behalf.
Basically the lawyers did it as they should, cited the proper cases, provided the proper analysis of precedent, and referenced a certain constitutional attorney with great hair who wrote an article about 2A...
After SCOTUS was called out in the State of the Union regarding Roe vs Wade I can imagine none of the justices are too thrilled with the current administration.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I would like to believe SCOTUS will respond in the most professional way possible saying “you would not need the extension if you didn’t take 14 months to issue a non response on a case, denied”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He repeats what’s he’s said before about the Bruen methodology, see post before: Text implicated, burden shifts to gov, common use and analogous laws.
However the new more thought provoking part is he believes this request is coming from the 2A supporting judges, and it’s meant to back the...