Search results

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
    1. B

      WARNING! FIREARM PURCHASE WITHOUT HQL AFTER OCT. 1st VIOLATES THE LAW

      The legitimate basis for what is in the MSP advisory is that MSP is the agency which interprets and enforces the law.
    2. B

      MSP: FIREARM PURCHASE APPLICANTS WITH APPLICATIONS PENDING ON OCT 1 WON'T NEED HQL

      This isn't California...at least not yet!
    3. B

      WARNING! FIREARM PURCHASE WITHOUT HQL AFTER OCT. 1st VIOLATES THE LAW

      Well, MSP answers to the Governor...so if the AG has a problem with them, he should head over to State Circle and talk to MOM...
    4. B

      WARNING! FIREARM PURCHASE WITHOUT HQL AFTER OCT. 1st VIOLATES THE LAW

      So even though MSP says we don't need an HQL after 10/1 to pick up guns bought before then, we shouldn't do it because we should strictly obey what posters on here say the law says? I'm sorry, but that really is cutting off your nose to spite your face...
    5. B

      CITIZEN GROUPS UNITE TO CHALLENGE MARYLAND FIREARMS BAN IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT

      Keeping my fingers crossed...thanks for filing the suit, and good luck to us all. :thumbsup:
    6. B

      WARNING! FIREARM PURCHASE WITHOUT HQL AFTER OCT. 1st VIOLATES THE LAW

      For the life of me, I can't understand why some folks on here don't get this. The Maryland Attorney General is the legal advisor for the state government, not a prosecutor. Exactly! That letter was not from Gansler. . No one is more cynical than I about our state government, especially...
    7. B

      WARNING! FIREARM PURCHASE WITHOUT HQL AFTER OCT. 1st VIOLATES THE LAW

      This isn't a novel or a movie, nor is it even a major issue in the grand scheme of things. There is no benefit to Gansler if he were to decide to try to charge people with breaking this law. As I said previously, it is inconceivable to me that the Governor, the AG, and the MSP are not all on...
    8. B

      WARNING! FIREARM PURCHASE WITHOUT HQL AFTER OCT. 1st VIOLATES THE LAW

      The AG issued an opinion on what the law means. The agency responsible for enforcing that law issued a statement on how they intend to do that. There is no confusion among those who understand how government works.
    9. B

      WARNING! FIREARM PURCHASE WITHOUT HQL AFTER OCT. 1st VIOLATES THE LAW

      I wish those who think the AG and MSP are not on the same page here would understand how government works and how politicians think...oh well.
    10. B

      WARNING! FIREARM PURCHASE WITHOUT HQL AFTER OCT. 1st VIOLATES THE LAW

      The police have discretion, whether it is in the realm of traffic laws or the realm of firearms laws. That was my point, to make an analogy, not to compare the two different types of laws. Analogy...comparison...two different things...
    11. B

      WARNING! FIREARM PURCHASE WITHOUT HQL AFTER OCT. 1st VIOLATES THE LAW

      Thanks for posting this information. My new-old S&W 586 will arrive at my FFL tomorrow, at which time I will fill out the 77R, and plan to take possession on Saturday, October 5. I have no fear that the State is setting me up to be arrested later, and I wish those whose paranoia is getting...
    12. B

      WARNING! FIREARM PURCHASE WITHOUT HQL AFTER OCT. 1st VIOLATES THE LAW

      Please refer to post #273 above.
    13. B

      WARNING! FIREARM PURCHASE WITHOUT HQL AFTER OCT. 1st VIOLATES THE LAW

      ??? Probably because they didn't know at that time that the policy change was forthcoming. This reinforces my conviction that the MSP merely implemented a policy change that the Governor, and perhaps the AG, decided to order. Because elected officials don't like to be embarrassed.
    14. B

      WARNING! FIREARM PURCHASE WITHOUT HQL AFTER OCT. 1st VIOLATES THE LAW

      I would bet $100 to a dozen donuts those parties all collaborated on MSP's change of position. Do you really think the MSP decided on its own to make that announcement???
    15. B

      WARNING! FIREARM PURCHASE WITHOUT HQL AFTER OCT. 1st VIOLATES THE LAW

      That's a distinction without a practical difference. Let me offer an analogy. Speed cameras in work zones are set to take your photo when you drive 11 miles over the speed limit. If you do 60 in a 55, you are breaking the law, but the state won't enforce it. This is the same situation...
    16. B

      WARNING! FIREARM PURCHASE WITHOUT HQL AFTER OCT. 1st VIOLATES THE LAW

      Thanks for posting this, but I fear it will make no difference to those whose cynicism about state government outweighs the plain English of the MSP...
    17. B

      WARNING! FIREARM PURCHASE WITHOUT HQL AFTER OCT. 1st VIOLATES THE LAW

      You make a good point, but I would ask you to consider this: The various anti-gun groups in Maryland are all aligned with the Administration. They do not see OweMalley and the MSP under him as adversaries but allies. Furthermore, MSP would not act alone on something as momentous as this...
    18. B

      WARNING! FIREARM PURCHASE WITHOUT HQL AFTER OCT. 1st VIOLATES THE LAW

      I am amazed at some of the comments here. When it comes to gun policy, the Maryland State Government, especially under this Governor, has been right up front about its hostility to the Second Amendment. If the State's official position is that buyers need an HQL to take possession after...
    19. B

      GET YOUR MAGAZINES!!!

      They will not deliver magazines of more than 10 rounds capacity to Maryland after October 1. If you are planning to buy a Mini 14 in the future, and are pretty sure about that, buy the mags now while you can.
    Top Bottom